Print Report

CEGL006506 Quercus rubra - Acer rubrum - Betula spp. - Pinus strobus Ruderal Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern Red Oak - Red Maple - Birch species - Eastern White Pine Ruderal Forest

Colloquial Name: Northeastern Ruderal Oak - Red Maple Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This deciduous to mixed forest of northern New England is a broadly defined community, usually developing after severe disturbance, including clearing, pasturing, logging, fires, severe hurricanes, or simply heavily fragmented residential development. While in some cases it is a successional type, it may persist in some settings, particularly where soils are limited, for example along ridgelines. The canopy trees are mostly 40-100 years old. The canopy ranges from somewhat open to closed; the shrub, herb and bryoid layers are patchy and rarely extensive. Composition is variable depending on site history. The canopy is usually mostly deciduous, dominated by a heterogeneous mixture of Quercus rubra, Acer rubrum, Pinus strobus, and Fagus grandifolia. Typically these occur in association with light-requiring, wind-dispersed trees such as Populus tremuloides, Populus grandidentata, Betula papyrifera, Betula populifolia, Fraxinus americana, and Prunus serotina. Minor associates include Picea rubens and Acer saccharum. Understory species tend to reflect predisturbance conditions and include Acer pensylvanicum, Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, or Hamamelis virginiana in the shrub layer. Vaccinium angustifolium is a typical low shrub, although it does not form a coherent layer. Pteridium aquilinum is characteristic and may be abundant in the herbaceous layer; other common herbs include Trientalis borealis, Maianthemum canadense, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Aralia nudicaulis. The bryophyte layer is of variable cover and may include Polytrichum commune and Dicranum polysetum. This association is differentiated from similar forests and woodlands by its thin canopy that usually includes early-successional species, particularly Acer rubrum, low abundance of tolerant hardwoods other than red oak, and the lack of a well-developed heath shrub layer (as is typical in oak-pine woodlands). Unlike oak and oak-pine forests to the south, Quercus rubra is the only oak species present in any abundance.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association was first described from the Northern Appalachian-Acadian ecoregion, where it approaches a matrix landscape pattern in the southern portions of the region while being absent from areas to the north. Similar forests extend southward. Further work in Lower New England suggests that this type may represent an earlier successional version of ~Pinus strobus - Quercus (rubra, velutina) - Fagus grandifolia Forest (CEGL006293)$$, and possibly of other later-successional types, distinguished by the preponderance of Acer rubrum in the canopy.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Canopy trees are mostly 40-100 years old. The canopy ranges from somewhat open to closed; the shrub, herb, and bryoid layers are patchy and rarely extensive. Composition is variable depending on site history. The canopy is usually mostly deciduous, dominated by a heterogeneous mixture of Quercus rubra, Pinus strobus, and Fagus grandifolia. Typically these occur in association with light-requiring, wind-dispersed trees such as Acer rubrum, Populus tremuloides, Populus grandidentata, Betula papyrifera, Betula populifolia, Fraxinus americana, and Prunus serotina. Minor associates include Picea rubens and Acer saccharum. Understory species tend to reflect predisturbance conditions and include Acer pensylvanicum, Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, or Hamamelis virginiana in the shrub layer. Vaccinium angustifolium is a typical low shrub. Pteridium aquilinum is characteristic, and may be abundant, in the herbaceous layer; other common herbs include Trientalis borealis, Maianthemum canadense, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Aralia nudicaulis. The bryophyte layer is of variable cover and may include Polytrichum commune and Dicranum polysetum.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This deciduous to mixed forest of northern New England is a broadly defined community, usually developing after severe disturbance including clearing, pasturing, logging, fires, severe hurricanes, or simply heavily fragmented residential development. While in some cases it is a successional type, it may persist in some settings, particularly where soils are limited, for example along ridgelines.

Geographic Range: This forest occurs in northern and central New England and adjacent Canada, south to Pennsylvania.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, ME, NB, NH, NY, PA, QC?, RI, VT




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: synonymous

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): Northern Appalachian Planning Team and L.A. Sneddon

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-07-05

  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., A. L. Feldmann, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, F. C. Sechler, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014b. Vegetation inventory: Saratoga National Historical Park, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/869, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., R. E. Zaremba, and Cogan Technology, Inc. 2017. Vegetation mapping inventory project: Minute Man National Historical Park, Massachusetts. Natural Resource Report NPS/MIMA/NRR--2017/1450. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1956. Notes on the vegetation of southeastern Mount Desert Island, Maine. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:335-392.
  • Lubinski, S., K. Hop, and S. Gawler. 2003. Vegetation Mapping Program: Acadia National Park, Maine. Report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, and Maine Natural Areas Program in conjunction with M. Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program, and K. Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator), USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and NatureServe. [http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/ftp/vegmapping/acad/reports/acadrpt.pdf]
  • Moore, B., and N. Taylor. 1927. An ecological study of the vegetation of Mount Desert Island, Maine. Brooklyn Botanical Garden Memoirs 3:1-151.
  • NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2004a. Soil survey of Saratoga County, New York. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 590 pp.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, M. Furedi, B. A. Eichelberger, A. Feldmann, G. Edinger, E. Eastman, and L. A. Sneddon. 2008. Vegetation classification and mapping at Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/133. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 370 pp.
  • Sechler, F. C., G. J. Edinger, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014. Vegetation classification and mapping at Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National Historic Sites, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/873, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 392 pp.
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.
  • Thompson, E., and J. Jenkins. 1992. Summary of field data from Minuteman National Park plant communities study. A report prepared under a contract with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program for the National Park Service. 39 pp.