Print Report

CEGL000168 Pinus contorta / Vaccinium cespitosum Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Lodgepole Pine / Dwarf Bilberry Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association is found in the upper montane and subalpine zone of the Rocky Mountains from north-central Colorado to southern Alberta. It is more common near and east of the Continental Divide, but occurs in the Uinta Mountains of northern Utah and in Idaho. Elevations range from 2950-3120 m (9700-10,240 feet) in northern Colorado down to 950-1800 m (3100-5900 feet) in the northern Rocky Mountains. It typically occurs on cold, dry-mesic sites where cold air accumulates causing high diurnal temperature fluctuations often with frequent summer frosts and high daily maximum temperatures. Topography is flat to gently undulating or moderately sloping terrain typically occurring on valley bottoms, terraces, lower slopes, and benches with variable aspects, but also on steep canyon slopes and benches, plateau tops and adjacent upper slopes in the Uinta Mountains. Soils are typically well-drained, moderately deep, acidic, gravelly or non-gravelly sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt or less frequently clay that are typically derived from a variety of noncalcareous parent materials. Ground cover is mostly litter, often with duff over 3 cm deep. The vegetation is characterized by a Pinus contorta-dominated tree canopy with Vaccinium cespitosum dominating or codominating the patchy to continuous dwarf-shrub layer. The tree canopy varies from moderately dense to nearly closed (40-90% cover) and is often composed solely of Pinus contorta. However, in some stands scattered Abies lasiocarpa, Larix occidentalis, Picea engelmannii, Pinus albicaulis, Populus tremuloides, or Pseudotsuga menziesii trees may be present, especially in the subcanopy. Some stands have tree saplings and scattered shrubs. Vaccinium cespitosum (indicator species) is usually dominates or codominates the dwarf-shrub layer. Other dwarf-shrubs may include low cover of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Paxistima myrsinites, Ribes spp., Linnaea borealis (on more mesic sites), or Juniperus communis and Vaccinium scoparium (drier sites). The herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense (to 30% cover) and is typically dominated or codominated by perennial graminoids such as Calamagrostis rubescens, Danthonia intermedia, Deschampsia cespitosa, Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, or Festuca spp. Forbs are generally have sparse cover but may be diverse. Mosses and lichens are common (5-20% cover) on some sites.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Many lower subalpine, spruce-fir and upper montane Douglas-fir forest and woodland stands include Pinus contorta trees in a mixed-conifer canopy. To clarify classification, only stands with tree canopies strongly dominated by Pinus contorta (usually >2/3 tree canopy) are considered to be Pinus contorta woodland and forest associations.

Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium caespitosum Habitat Type (Williams et al. 1990b) may include seral stands that would be classified as this association, which would significantly extend its range westward. Further research is needed to resolve this question. Steele et al. (1981) report this association occurring in the Little Rocky Mountains, but Roberts (1980) did not classify it in his study.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This forest association is characterized by a Pinus contorta-dominated tree canopy with Vaccinium cespitosum dominating or codominating the patchy to continuous dwarf-shrub layer. The tree canopy varies from moderately dense to nearly closed (40-90% cover) and is often composed solely of Pinus contorta. However, in some stands scattered Abies lasiocarpa, Larix occidentalis, Picea engelmannii, Pinus albicaulis, Populus tremuloides, or Pseudotsuga menziesii trees may be present, especially in the subcanopy. Some stands have tree saplings and scattered shrubs, Amelanchier alnifolia, Spiraea betulifolia, Symphoricarpos albus. Vaccinium cespitosum (indicator species) usually dominates or codominates the dwarf-shrub layer. Other dwarf-shrubs may include low cover of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Paxistima myrsinites, Ribes spp., Linnaea borealis (more mesic sites), or Juniperus communis and Vaccinium scoparium (drier sites). The herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense (to 30% cover) and is typically dominated or codominated by perennial graminoids such as Calamagrostis rubescens, Danthonia intermedia, Deschampsia cespitosa, Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, or Festuca spp. Forbs are generally sparse and may include Antennaria spp., Arnica cordifolia, Chamerion angustifolium, Lupinus argenteus, Maianthemum stellatum, Polygonum bistortoides, Potentilla diversifolia, Penstemon procerus, Pseudocymopterus montanus, Osmorhiza berteroi (= Osmorhiza chilensis), Solidago simplex, Thalictrum occidentale, and Viola spp. Mosses and lichens are common (5-20% cover) on some sites.

Dynamics:  The dominance of Pinus contorta in stands of this association is related to fire history and topo-edaphic conditions (Cooper 1975, Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1981, 1983, Cooper et al. 1987). Following stand-replacing fires, Pinus contorta will rapidly colonize and develop into dense stands of even-aged trees. Over time, many of these stands can succeed to dominance by other, more shade-tolerant conifer species. Most forests in this alliance are early- to mid-successional, which developed following fires and are considered seral to ~Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium cespitosum Forest (CEGL000340)$$, less often ~Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium cespitosum Forest (CEGL005926)$$, and in extreme cold sites with ~Pseudotsuga menziesii / Vaccinium cespitosum Forest (CEGL000465)$$ (Cooper 1975, Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1981, 1983), while other stands have a canopy that is dominated by more persistent Pinus contorta that is successfully regenerating, especially on more extreme sites with only scattered Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Picea glauca, or Pseudotsuga menziesii.

Environmental Description:  This association is found in the upper montane and subalpine zone of the Rocky Mountains from north-central Colorado to southern Alberta. It is more common near and east of the Continental Divide, but occurs in the Uinta Mountains of northern Utah and in Idaho. Elevations range from 2950-3120 m (9700-10,240 feet) in northern Colorado down to 950-1800 m (3100-5900 feet) in the northern Rocky Mountains. It typically occurs on cold, dry-mesic sites where cold air accumulates causing high diurnal temperature fluctuations often with frequent summer frosts and high daily maximum temperatures. Topography is flat to gently undulating or moderately sloping terrain typically occurring on valley bottoms, terraces, lower slopes, and benches with variable aspects, but also on steep canyon slopes and benches, plateau tops and adjacent upper slopes in the Uinta Mountains. Soils are typically well-drained, moderately deep, acidic, gravelly or non-gravelly sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt or less frequently clay that are typically derived from a variety of noncalcareous parent materials such as glacial till, quartzite, granite, quartz monzonite, gneiss, schist, phyllite, sandstone and alluvium (Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1981, Mauk and Henderson 1984, Cooper et al. 1987). Ground cover is mostly litter, often with duff over 3 cm deep.

Geographic Range: This association occurs in the upper montane and subalpine zone of the Rocky Mountains from north-central Colorado to southern Alberta. It is more common near and east of the Continental Divide, but also is found in the Uinta Mountains of northern Utah and in Idaho.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, CO, ID, MT, OR, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium caespitosum Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium caespitosum Habitat Type (Cooper et al. 1987)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977)
< Picea / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium caespitosum Community Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Cooper et al. 1987)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium cespitosum Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
< Pseudotsuga menziesii / Vaccinium cespitosum Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981) [Stands occurring on extremely cold sites.]

Concept Author(s): Western Ecology Group

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-03-05

  • ANHIC [Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Community database files. Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development, Edmonton.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Cooper, S. V. 1975. Forest habitat types of northwestern Wyoming and contiguous portion of Montana and Idaho. Unpublished dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. 190 pp.
  • Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  • Hop, K., M. Reid, J. Dieck, S. Lubinski, and S. Cooper. 2007. U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI. 131 pp. plus Appendices A-L.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., S. V. Cooper, and G. Kittel. 2004. Vegetation classification of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. Final report for USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, International Peace Park Mapping Project. NatureServe, Arlington VA.
  • Roberts, D. W. 1980. Forest habitat types of the Bear''s Paw Mountains and Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. Unpublished thesis, Department of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 116 pp.
  • Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Williams, C. K., T. R. Lillybridge, and B. G. Smith. 1990b. Forested plant associations of the Colville National Forest. Report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Colville National Forest, Colville, WA. 133 pp.