Print Report

CEGL001207 Salix geyeriana / Carex utriculata Wet Shrubland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Geyer''s Willow / Northwest Territory Sedge Wet Shrubland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: Throughout its distribution, this association occurs in mountains and high valleys at elevations ranging from 1310 to 2740 m (4300-9000 feet). This is the wettest of the Salix geyeriana-dominated willow shrublands. It is most common on broad, level floodplains but does occur in narrow bands along smaller streams in open U-shaped valleys. Valley bottom gradients are usually low. Surface microtopography is often hummocky as a result of the irregular buildup of organic material. Stands have a 1- to 3-m tall, nearly closed canopy to open clumps that are dominated by the deciduous shrub Salix geyeriana, with a thick carpet of graminoids in the undergrowth that is dominated by Carex utriculata. A diversity of other shrubs may be present but usually in low amounts. Some of these subordinate shrubs are present in the upper canopy along with Salix geyeriana, such as Salix boothii, Salix drummondiana, Salix monticola, and Alnus incana. Often there are shorter shrubs present but usually with not more than 20% cover. Shorter shrub species include Salix planifolia, Salix wolfii, Betula glandulosa, Ribes inerme, Lonicera involucrata, or Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda. Carex utriculata clearly dominates the understory. Other sedges and grasses, such as Carex aquatilis, Carex interior, Carex scopulorum, Carex simulata, Carex praegracilis, or Calamagrostis canadensis, may be present, but they have low cover. Forb species are sparse, but Geum macrophyllum appears to be the most constant species across the range of this type.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Many studies throughout the Rocky Mountain west have documented this association. All of these classifications have used the old name Carex rostrata, which is now known to be strictly boreal. This name is superseded by Carex utriculata (Reznicek 1987).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Salix geyeriana dominates the overstory and can have large, often widely spaced clumps. Salix geyeriana can be as much as 3 m tall. A diversity of other shrubs may be present but usually in low amounts. Some of these subordinate shrubs are present in the upper canopy along with Salix geyeriana, such as Salix boothii, Salix drummondiana, Salix monticola, and Alnus incana. Often there are shorter shrubs present but usually with not more than 20% cover. Shorter shrub species include Salix planifolia, Salix wolfii, Betula glandulosa, Ribes inerme, Lonicera involucrata, and Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda (= Potentilla fruticosa). Carex utriculata clearly dominates the understory. Other sedges and grasses, such as Carex aquatilis, Carex interior, Carex scopulorum, Carex simulata, Carex praegracilis, or Calamagrostis canadensis, may be present, but they have low cover. Forb species are sparse, but Geum macrophyllum appears to be the most constant species across the range of this type.

Dynamics:  This association is the wettest of all Salix geyeriana types. Prolonged, intense utilization by livestock and wild ungulates may shift the site potential to a drier grazing disclimax, characterized by more open stands with exotic grasses, such as Poa pratensis and Agrostis stolonifera, dominating the understory. Beavers may exert a significant influence on sites as well. Active dams maintain high water tables needed to support this type. However, sustained removal of willows by beavers may reduce the site to a Carex utriculata association. When beaver abandon a site, the dams eventually deteriorate, and the water table may drop, shifting the site potential to ~Salix geyeriana / Calamagrostis canadensis Wet Shrubland (CEGL001205)$$. The wet organic soils can be strongly impacted by livestock and heavy machinery, but the dense roots and rhizomes of Carex utriculata bind the soil and stabilize the site. Loss of the shallow water table, through soil damage and/or stream incision, will initially shift undergrowth composition towards drier graminoids and forbs. Willow regeneration will be limited, and the mature individuals will eventually become decadent. Carex utriculata provides a very high level of streambank stabilization.

Environmental Description:  Throughout its distribution, this association occurs in mountains and high valleys at elevations ranging from 1310 to 2740 m (4300-9000 feet). This is the wettest of the Salix geyeriana-dominated willow shrublands. It is most common on broad, level floodplains but does occur in narrow bands along smaller streams in open U-shaped valleys. Valley bottom gradients are usually low. Surface microtopography is often hummocky as a result of the irregular buildup of organic material. Hydrology of these sites is usually maintained through subirrigation, and soil moisture is maintained at or near the surface in most cases. These sites may or may not be annually flooded during high water in the spring and early summer. This association occurs on a range of soil types that are typically wet, cold, and organic or have organic surface horizons. They are generally classified as Mollisols and Histisols. Organic surface horizons, often extending to a depth of 45 cm (18 inches) or more, are riddled with fibrous roots and plant material. Soil textures are categorized as fine, generally silts and clays. Deeper alluvial mineral deposits are composed of coarse and fine sands and gravels. The soils are usually mottled, indicating seasonal flooding and water table recession.

Geographic Range: This association has been document in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CO, ID, MT, NV, OR, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Salix / Carex rostrata (Kovalchik 1987) [p.84. Includes stands of Salix geyeriana or Salix boothii with Carex utriculata in the understory.]
= Salix geyeriana - Salix spp. / Carex utriculata Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
= Salix geyeriana - Salix spp. / Carex utriculata Plant Association (Phillips 1977)
< Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata - Carex aquatilis Community Type (Mutz and Queiroz 1983) [p.65 and Appendix G. Includes one stand dominated by Carex aquatilis in the understory; the other 3 stands match our concept with Carex utriculata in the understory.]
= Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community (Jones 1992c)
= Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community Type (Manning and Padgett 1995) [p.116.]
< Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community Type (Hansen et al. 1995) [p.304. Includes stands dominated solely by Salix boothii and combinations of Salix geyeriana and Salix boothii. See Classification Comments regarding notes on Carex rostrata.]
= Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989) [p.67.]
= Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community Type (Walford et al. 2001) [p.R-77.]
< Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Community Type (Youngblood et al. 1985a) [p.30. Some stands dominated by Carex aquatilis are included.]
< Salix geyeriana / Carex rostrata Habitat Type (Hall and Hansen 1997) [p.206. Includes stands dominated by Salix boothii and stands with more Carex aquatilis than Carex utriculata.]
= Salix geyeriana / Carex utriculata Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Salix geyeriana / Wet Carex Ecological Type (Girard et al. 1997) [p.149.]
< Salix spp. / Carex rostrata Community Type (Tuhy and Jensen 1982) [p.62. Includes stands dominated by Salix wolfii, Salix planifolia, Salix geyeriana, or Salix drummondiana, all with a Carex utriculata understory. At least 3 plots match the pure Salix geyeriana / Carex utriculata type (p.162).]
= Geyer willow/beaked sedge (Salix geyeriana/Carex utriculata) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)

Concept Author(s): Western Ecology Group

Author of Description: G. Kittel

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-16-05

  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Cogan, D., K. Varga, and G. Kittel. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Grand Teton National Park and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway. Final Project Report 2002-2005 Vegetation Mapping Project. Technical Memorandum 8260-06-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 87 pp. plus Appendixes A-F.
  • Girard, M., D. L. Wheeler, and S. B. Mills. 1997. Classification of riparian communities on the Bighorn National Forest. R2-RR-97-02. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Sheridan, WY. 308 pp.
  • Hall, J. B., and P. L. Hansen. 1997. A preliminary riparian habitat type classification system for the Bureau of Land Management districts in southern and eastern Idaho. Riparian and Wetland Research Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana. Idaho Bureau of Land Management, Technical Bulletin No. 97-11. 381 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Jones, G. 1992c. A preliminary classification of riparian vegetation types of the Medicine Bow Range and the Sierra Madre. Report submitted to the Medicine Bow National Forest. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (The Nature Conservancy), Laramie, WY.
  • Jones, G., and S. Ogle. 2000. Characterization abstracts for vegetation types on the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone national forests. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Region 2 by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
  • Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G. M., and N. D. Lederer. 1993. A preliminary classification of the riparian vegetation of the Yampa and San Miguel/Dolores river basins. Unpublished report prepared for Colorado Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency by The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kovalchik, B. L. 1987. Riparian zone associations - Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and Winema national forests. Technical Paper 279-87. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 171 pp.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Manning, M. E., and W. G. Padgett. 1995. Riparian community type classification for Humboldt and Toiyabe national forests, Nevada and eastern California. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region. 306 pp.
  • Mutz, K. M., and J. Queiroz. 1983. Riparian community classification for the Centennial Mountains and South Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Unpublished report prepared for USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region under contract 53-84M8-2-0048 by Meiiji Resource Consultants, Layton, UT. 168 pp.
  • Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Peterson, E. B. 2008. International Vegetation Classification alliances and associations occurring in Nevada with proposed additions. Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Carson City, NV. 348 pp.
  • Phillips, C. M. 1977. Willow carrs of the upper Laramie River Valley, Colorado. Unpublished thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 71 pp.
  • Reznicek, A. A. 1987. Key to Carex rostrata complex in North America. Unpublished key. 3 pp.
  • Rice, P. M., E. W. Schweiger, W. Gustafson, C. Lea, D. Manier, D. Shorrock, B. Frakes, and L. O’Gan. 2012c. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2012/589. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 176 pp.
  • Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
  • Tuhy, J. S., and S. Jensen. 1982. Riparian classification for the Upper Salmon and Middle Fork Salmon River drainages, Idaho. Unpublished report prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region by White Horse Associates, Smithfield, UT. 183 pp.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
  • Walford, G., G. Jones, W. Fertig, S. Mellman-Brown, and K. Houston. 2001. Riparian and wetland plant community types of the Shoshone National Forest. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-85. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 122 pp.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Youngblood, A. P., W. G. Padgett, and A. H. Winward. 1985a. Riparian community type classification of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. R4-Ecol-85-01. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT. 78 pp.