Print Report

CEGL005162 Cakile edentula Great Lakes Shore Sparse Vegetation

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: American Searocket Great Lakes Shore Sparse Vegetation

Colloquial Name: Great Lakes Searocket Beach

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community occurs along unstable shorelines in the Great Lakes region of the United States and Canada. Sites are severely affected by wind, waves, and winter ice. Easily shifted sand or gravel substrate permits little vegetation to develop, unless protected by a shoreline configuration that breaks waves and blocks winter ice. Soils are typically sands and gravels with little organic matter. Cakile edentula, Ammophila breviligulata, and Salix myricoides typically grow on sand beaches. Other common plant species include Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Argentina anserina, Salix spp., Schoenoplectus spp., and Xanthium strumarium. A shrub zone (Physocarpus opulifolius, Cornus sericea, Rosa acicularis, etc.) can develop at the inland margin of some gravel beaches. Species found on sand and gravel beaches in most cases are those of other shoreline habitats which gain a tenuous foothold on the beach.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Stands occur on narrow shoreline-sand beaches. Some are associated with large dune systems. The beach can include the sparsely vegetated parts of the upper beach, which is usually beyond the reach of the waves, and can form sand flats. In Wisconsin this type is only on Lake Michigan. The Cakile edentula variety is primarily lacustris. Minnesota may have only a minor occurrence in the Duluth area.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Cakile edentula, Ammophila breviligulata, and Salix myricoides (= Salix glaucophylloides) typically grow on sand beaches. Other common plant species include Chamaesyce polygonifolia (= Euphorbia polygonifolia), Argentina anserina (= Potentilla anserina), Salix spp., Schoenoplectus spp. (= Scirpus spp.), and Xanthium strumarium. A shrub zone (Physocarpus opulifolius, Cornus sericea, Rosa acicularis, etc.) can develop at the inland margin of some gravel beaches. Species found on sand and gravel beaches in most cases are those of other shoreline habitats which gain a tenuous foothold on the beach.

Dynamics:  Sites are severely affected by wind, waves, and winter ice.

Environmental Description:  Sites occur along unstable shorelines of the Great Lakes. Easily shifted sand or gravel substrate permits little vegetation to develop, unless protected by a shoreline configuration that breaks waves and blocks winter ice. Soils are typically sands and gravels with little organic matter. The beach can include the sparsely vegetated parts of the upper beach, which is usually beyond the reach of the waves, and can form a type of sand plain.

Geographic Range: This community occurs along unstable shorelines in the Great Lakes region of the United States and Canada, ranging from sandy shores of all states and Ontario that are associated with the Great Lakes.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IL, IN, MI, MN, NY, OH, ON, PA, VT, WI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Cakile edentula Great Lakes Shore Sparse Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Beach Great Lakes Subtype]
= Beach Community (Anderson 1996) [Anderson provides an excellent review of species on the beach community in Ohio.]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: P. Comer

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-29-97

  • Anderson, D. M. 1996. The vegetation of Ohio: Two centuries of change. Draft. Ohio Biological Survey.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • INHDC [Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center]. No date. Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center, Division of Nature Preserves, Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • ONHD [Ohio Natural Heritage Database]. No date. Vegetation classification of Ohio and unpublished data. Ohio Natural Heritage Database, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.
  • Zimmerman, E. A. 2011v. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Great Lakes Sparsely Vegetated Shore Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16077] (accessed February 14, 2012)
  • Zimmerman, E. A., T. Davis, M. A. Furedi, B. Eichelberger, J. McPherson, S. Seymour, G. Podniesinski, N. Dewar, and J. Wagner, editors. 2012. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Communities.aspx]