Print Report

CEGL005083 Cornus spp. - Salix spp. - Vaccinium corymbosum - Rhamnus alnifolia - Toxicodendron vernix Fen

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Dogwood species - Willow species - Highbush Blueberry - Alderleaf Buckthorn - Poison-sumac Fen

Colloquial Name: Dogwood - Willow - Blueberry Fen

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This tall-shrub swamp or poor fen type is found in kettle lake areas from southern parts of the Great Lake states and northern parts of adjacent central states of the midwestern United States. Stands are found in kettle lakes associated with kettle-kame-end moraine topography. Soils are saturated peat. The tall-shrub zone occupies the most consolidated peat. The vegetation is dominated by tall shrubs, with at least 25% cover, and a fairly continuous covering of sphagnum moss. Herbaceous cover is variable, and tree cover is less than 10%. The dominant shrubs are Aronia melanocarpa, Cornus sericea, Gaylussacia baccata, Ilex verticillata, Ilex mucronata, Toxicodendron vernix, and Vaccinium corymbosum. A sphagnum mat is fairly continuous. The herbaceous layer is not well characterized. The exotic shrub Frangula alnus can be problematic.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This is the tall-shrub counterpart to the low-shrub bog in kettle lakes, ~Chamaedaphne calyculata / Carex oligosperma - Eriophorum virginicum Acidic Peatland (CEGL005092)$$. It is distinguished from the Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry) bogs, ~Vaccinium corymbosum - Gaylussacia baccata - Aronia melanocarpa / Calla palustris Acidic Peatland (CEGL005085)$$, by the more diverse shrub layer and less than 25% (?) cover of Vaccinium corymbosum. However, this distinction needs to be further studied. In addition, this tall-shrub zone is not always tracked by state Heritage programs, being too small a zone or too transitional a type. It also overlaps in concept with ~Cornus amomum - Salix spp. - Toxicodendron vernix - Rhamnus lanceolata Fen (CEGL005087)$$; however, that type is typically associated with calcareous fens.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation is dominated by tall shrubs, with at least 25% cover, and a fairly continuous covering of sphagnum moss. Herbaceous cover is variable, and tree cover is less than 10%. The dominant shrubs are Aronia melanocarpa, Cornus sericea (= Cornus stolonifera), Gaylussacia baccata, Ilex verticillata, Ilex mucronata (= Nemopanthus mucronatus), Toxicodendron vernix (= Rhus vernix), and Vaccinium corymbosum. A sphagnum mat is fairly continuous. The herbaceous layer is not well-characterized. The exotic shrub Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula) can be problematic (White and Madany 1978, Anderson 1982, Homoya et al. 1985).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands are found in kettle lakes associated with kettle-kame-end moraine topography. Soils are saturated peat. The tall-shrub zone occupies the most consolidated peat (White and Madany 1978, Anderson 1982, Homoya et al. 1985).

Geographic Range: This tall-shrub swamp or poor fen type is found in kettle lake areas from southern parts of the Great Lake states and northern parts of adjacent central states of the midwestern United States. Stands range from the southern parts of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ontario to northern parts of Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  NY, OH, ON, QC?




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Cornus spp. - Salix spp. - Vaccinium corymbosum - Rhamnus alnifolia - Toxicodendron vernix Shrubland (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Southern Tall Shrub Swamp]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-01-99

  • Anderson, D. M. 1982. Plant communities of Ohio: A preliminary classification and description. Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH. 182 pp.
  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Homoya, M. A., D. B. Abrell, J. R. Aldrich, and T. W. Post. 1985. The natural regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:245-268.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • ONHD [Ohio Natural Heritage Database]. No date. Vegetation classification of Ohio and unpublished data. Ohio Natural Heritage Database, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.