Print Report

CEGL001363 Sarcobatus vermiculatus / Distichlis spicata Wet Shrubland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Greasewood / Saltgrass Wet Shrubland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association is reported from western Montana to Washington, south to Nevada, Utah and Colorado. Elevation ranges from approximately 600-2300 m. It forms expansive shrublands on broad floodplains along large rivers and streams, on the margins of upland seeps, and forms an outer ring around playas above the Distichlis spicata-dominated center. Flooding is generally intermittent. Substrates are deep, alkaline, saline and generally fine-textured soils with a perennial high water table. However, in southern Colorado''s San Luis Valley, stands grow between salt flat depressions (playas) on sandy hummocks approximately 1.2 m above the lakebed. The vegetation is characterized by a fairly open to moderate shrub canopy (18-60% cover) dominated by Sarcobatus vermiculatus with an herbaceous layer dominated by the rhizomatous graminoid Distichlis spicata (10-80% cover). Associated shrubs and dwarf-shrubs may include Ericameria nauseosa, Gutierrezia sarothrae, and Tetradymia canescens. Sporobolus airoides may codominate the graminoid layer, and Hordeum jubatum is common in disturbed stands. Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis and Leymus cinereus are also present in some stands. The forb layer is generally sparse and composed of species such as Iva axillaris and Ipomopsis spp. Introduced species may be present to abundant in disturbed stands.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association is defined as a PNV vegetation type. Sporobolus airoides is often a codominant in the understory of this association, it is somewhat unclear how to distinguish it from ~Atriplex canescens / Sporobolus airoides Shrubland (CEGL001291)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation is characterized by a fairly open to moderate shrub canopy (18-60% cover) dominated by Sarcobatus vermiculatus with an herbaceous layer dominated by the rhizomatous graminoid Distichlis spicata (10-80% cover). Associated shrubs and dwarf-shrubs may include Ericameria nauseosa, Gutierrezia sarothrae, and Tetradymia canescens. Sporobolus airoides may codominate the graminoid layer, and Hordeum jubatum is common in disturbed stands. Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus) and Leymus cinereus are also present in some stands. The forb layer is generally sparse and composed of species such as Iva axillaris and Ipomopsis spp. Introduced species, such as Bromus tectorum, Lepidium latifolium, Lepidium perfoliatum, and Bassia hyssopifolia, may be present to abundant in disturbed stands.

The stand described by Baker (1982b) for the Piceance Basin had patches of Sarcobatus vermiculatus alternating with wide expanses of Distichlis spicata (= var. stricta). A few species of annuals also were present but could not be identified. Cover of Sarcobatus in this stand was not high. Baker (1982b) reports that many Sarcobatus-dominated communities are in the literature for Colorado, with understories of exotic annual weeds. His stand was one of only a few stands from western Colorado that still contains a native perennial grass understory.

Data from Costello (1944b) for the San Juan Valley show dominance of Sarcobatus, with >60% cover, and Chrysothamnus spp. are associated. The understory consists primarily of Distichlis spicata and Sporobolus airoides, with Bouteloua gracilis, Iva axillaris, and Muhlenbergia richardsonis (= Muhlenbergia squarrosa) commonly present. Costello (1944b) also reported on Sarcobatus-dominated stands in western Colorado and Wyoming with several associated shrub species, including Artemisia tridentata, Atriplex gardneri, Atriplex confertifolia, and Bassia americana (= Kochia americana). Herbaceous species include Elymus lanceolatus (= Elytrigia dasystachya), Salsola spp., and Sporobolus airoides.

Hanson (1929) reports that the appearance of greasewood stands varies greatly with depth to water table and salt concentration in the soil. It can form almost pure, tall stands, or in places be much more open with shrubs and grasses associated.

Dynamics:  Sarcobatus vermiculatus and Distichlis spicata, like many facultative halophytes, are tolerant of alkaline and saline soil conditions that allow the species to occur in sites with less interspecific competition (Ungar et al. 1969, Branson et al. 1976). Sarcobatus vermiculatus is often found on sites with high water tables that are intermittently flooded. Hansen et al. (1995) reported that it can tolerate saturated soil conditions for up to 40 days. Sarcobatus vermiculatus-dominated vegetation can occur as a narrow band along a stream, a broad floodplain shrubland, or as a mosaic of communities where composition and density of the shrub and understory species vary with depth to water table, salinity and alkalinity, soil texture, and past land use or disturbance. This shrubland may occur as a band of abrupt concentric rings of vegetation around a salt flat or depression. This visible zonation is caused by the change in dominant species and their relative tolerances to soil salinity and depth to groundwater.

The warm-season grass Distichlis spicata is rhizomatous, tolerant of moderate grazing, and its roots resist trampling. Although relatively unpalatable, it can provide valuable winter forage for livestock, if needed. When grazed, Distichlis spicata generally increases because of reduced competition from other less grazing-tolerant species. If grazed heavily, Distichlis spicata will decline and may be replaced by less desirable warm-season grasses such as tumblegrass, Schedonnardus paniculatus, or Hordeum jubatum (Costello 1944b, Jones and Walford 1995). Weeds are generally not a problem because few grow well in saline soils. However, severely disturbed sites are susceptible to invasion by introduced species such as Bromus tectorum, Lepidium latifolium, Lepidium perfoliatum, and Bassia hyssopifolia (Franklin and Dyrness 1973).

Anything that raises the water table of a closed basin will result in an increase in this type, due to the resulting alkalinity of the soils. Grazing of domestic livestock decreases Distichlis and results in its replacement by annual weedy plants such as Bromus tectorum, Chorispora spp., and Lepidium spp. (Baker 1982b).

Environmental Description:  This shrubland occupies alkaline flatlands and valley bottoms. These areas are usually closed basins or have poor drainage. Elevation ranges from approximately 600-2300 m. Stands form expansive shrublands on broad floodplains along large rivers and streams, fill low-gradient drainages below springs and seeps, or form an outer ring around playas above the Distichlis spicata-dominated center. Flooding is generally intermittent. Substrates are deep, alkaline, saline and generally fine-textured soils with a perennial high water table. However, in southern Colorado''s San Luis Valley, stands grow between salt flat depressions (playas) on sandy hummocks approximately 1.2 m above the lakebed. Cryptogamic crusts are important on some sites.

Geographic Range: This shrubland association occurs throughout much of the interior West from western Montana to Washington, south to Nevada, Utah and Colorado.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Sarcobatus vermiculatus - Distichlis spicata Community (Crawford 2001) [(p.72)]
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus - Distichlis stricta Association (Franklin and Dyrness 1973) [(p.227)]
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus - Distichlis stricta Habitat Type (Mueggler and Stewart 1980) [(p.76)]
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus / Distichlis spicata Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus / Distichlis spicata associaton (Crawford 2003) [4 plots]
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus / Distichlis stricta Association (Daubenmire 1970) [(p.51)]
= Sarcobatus vermiculatus/Distichlis spicata (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Greasewood/salt grass (Sarcobatus vermiculatus/Distichlis spicata) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)

Concept Author(s): M.S. Reid

Author of Description: M.S. Reid, K.A. Schulz and J. Coles

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-10-05

  • Baker, W. L. 1982b. Natural vegetation of the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Appendix D, pages 1-113 in: J. S. Peterson and W. L. Baker, editors. Inventory of the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Unpublished report for the Bureau Land Management, Craig, CO.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Branson, F. A., R. F. Miller, and I. S. McQueen. 1976. Moisture relationships in twelve northern desert shrub communities near Grand Junction, Colorado. Ecology 57:1104-1124.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Clark, D., M. Dela Cruz, T. Clark, J. Coles, S. Topp, A. Evenden, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and J. Von Loh. 2009. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Capitol Reef National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/187. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 882 pp.
  • Costello, D. F. 1944b. Important species of the major forage types in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Monographs 14:107-134.
  • Crawford, R. C. 2001. Initial riparian and wetland classification and characterization of the Columbia Basin in Washington. Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. 83 pp.
  • Crawford, R. C. 2003. Riparian vegetation classification of the Columbia Basin, Washington. Natural Heritage Report 2003-03. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. 98 pp. plus appendices.
  • Daubenmire, R. F. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 62. 131 pp.
  • Donnelly, P., D. Lindsey, E. Muldavin, Y. Chauvin, and A. Browder. 2006. Vegetation communities of Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge Remote Sensing Lab, Albuquerque, NM, and Natural Heritage New Mexico, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. Final report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region (R2), National Wildlife Refuge System (NWR), NWR Remote Sensing Lab, Division of Planning. 27 pp. [http://www.fws.gov/data/documents/BDA%20NVCS%20Veg%20Community%20Report%20Example.pdf]
  • Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. General Technical Report PNW-8. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. 417 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hanson, H. C. 1929. Range resources of the San Luis Valley. Pages 5-61 in: Range resources of the San Luis Valley. Bulletin 335. Colorado Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  • IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
  • Jones, G. 1992b. Wyoming plant community classification (Draft). Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 183 pp.
  • Jones, G. P., and G. M. Walford. 1995. Major riparian vegetation types of eastern Wyoming. Submitted to Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 245 pp.
  • Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, A. McMullen, and J. Sanderson. 1999b. A classification of riparian and wetland plant associations of Colorado: A user''s guide to the classification project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO. 70 pp. plus appendices.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Mueggler, W. F., and W. L. Stewart. 1980. Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. General Technical Report INT-66. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 154 pp.
  • Peterson, E. B. 2008. International Vegetation Classification alliances and associations occurring in Nevada with proposed additions. Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Carson City, NV. 348 pp.
  • Romme, W. H., K. D. Heil, J. M. Porter, and R. Fleming. 1993. Plant communities of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. USDI National Park Service, Technical Report NPS/NAUCARE/NRTER-93/02. Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Northern Arizona University. 37 pp.
  • Salas, D. E., J. Stevens, K. Schulz, M. Artmann, B. Friesen, S. Blauer, E. W. Schweiger, and A. Valdez. 2010b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2010/179. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Schulz, K. A., and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, CO. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H.
  • Ungar, I. A., W. Hogan, and M. McClennand. 1969. Plant communities of saline soils at Lincoln, Nebraska. The American Midland Naturalist 82(2):564-577.
  • Von Loh, J., D. Cogan, K. Schulz, D. Crawford, T. Meyer, J. Pennell, and M. Pucherelli. 2002. USGS-USFWS Vegetation Mapping Program, Ouray National Wildlife Refuge, Utah. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Technical Memorandum 8260-02-03. Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO. 225 pp.
  • WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.