Print Report

CEGL002427 Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana - Celtis laevigata / Ilex decidua Floodplain Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Green Ash - American Elm - Sugarberry / Possum-haw Floodplain Forest

Colloquial Name: Southern Green Ash - Elm - Sugarberry Floodplain Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This green ash - American elm - sugarberry community is found throughout the central and southern United States. Stands occur in floodplains of major rivers where water is absent for most of the growing season. Soils are moist alluvial clay or silt loams. Ulmus americana was once the most prominent member of this forest, but Dutch elm disease (Ceratostomella ulmi) and logging have eliminated many of the largest mature Ulmus spp. from most of the species natural range. Fraxinus pennsylvanica dominates on moist flats and shallow sloughs, while Celtis laevigata is most prevalent on new land or front sites. Other species commonly encountered include Carya aquatica, Quercus lyrata, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer negundo. The subcanopy is often dense and dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica which sprouts prolifically. Shrubs typical of this forest include Cornus drummondii, Ilex decidua, and Crataegus spp. The herbaceous layer is dense and diverse, dominated by Galium spp., Viola spp., Carex spp., Leersia spp., Boehmeria cylindrica, Laportea canadensis, Pilea pumila, Impatiens capensis, and Impatiens pallida. Vines most often encountered include Toxicodendron radicans, Campsis radicans, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This community is a broadleaf deciduous floodplain forest which exhibits high canopy diversity and good herbaceous diversity (although lower herbaceous diversity than mesic floodplain forest). Ulmus americana was once the most prominent member of this forest, but Dutch elm disease (Ceratostomella ulmi) and logging have eliminated many of the largest mature Ulmus spp. from most of the species natural range (Collingwood and Brush 1984). Fraxinus pennsylvanica dominates on moist flats and shallow sloughs, while Celtis laevigata is most prevalent on new land or front sites. Other species commonly encountered include Carya aquatica, Quercus lyrata, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer negundo. The subcanopy is often dense and dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica which sprouts prolifically. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, however, is considered a pioneer species and does not maintain its canopy position under intense shading found in later successional stages (Voigt and Mohlenbrock 1964). Shrubs typical of this forest include Cornus drummondii, Ilex decidua, and Crataegus spp. The herbaceous layer is dense and diverse, dominated by Galium spp., Viola spp., Carex spp., Leersia spp., Boehmeria cylindrica, Laportea canadensis, Pilea pumila, Impatiens capensis (= Impatiens biflora), and Impatiens pallida. Vines most often encountered include Toxicodendron radicans, Campsis radicans, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia (TNC 1995a).

Species variability within and among occurrences of this community is great and directly related to the level of saturation of the substrate. Alluvial deposition varies and slight ridges may favor sugarberry, while depressions will favor green ash. Species variability and composition within this community are considerable as a result of a mosaic of moisture conditions controlled by seasonal flooding and local topography. In the northern part of the range (north-central Oklahoma, northern Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, southern Illinois, southeastern Indiana), this community coincides with the distribution of Celtis occidentalis. In this section Celtis occidentalis is often a dominant in the canopy-subcanopy. In Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, and southwestern Missouri, Quercus texana is a major associate in this type. Celtis laevigata is especially abundant on river front and disturbed sites. Fraxinus pennsylvanica is relatively more abundant on saturated flats or shallow sloughs. Berchemia scandens is common in this community northward through southeastern Virginia and Tennessee. Areas that have been cleared or logged in the past may have locally abundant disturbance species such as Acer rubrum, Pinus taeda, Liquidambar styraciflua, or Platanus occidentalis.

Dynamics:  Frequent or prolonged ponding due to excessive rainfall or beaver activity results in considerable variations in vegetative structure and composition, often causing high tree mortality. Flooding occurs during the winter and spring and often extends into the growing season. Although this community can be early-successional, occurring on river fronts and other recently disturbed areas, this is a generally long-lived type (Eyre 1980, Diamond 1993). This community is usually located in transitional areas between Quercus michauxii - Quercus pagoda floodplain forests and Quercus lyrata - Quercus phellos bottomland forests.

Environmental Description:  This community occurs in floodplains of major rivers, generally alluvial or brownwater rivers, on low ridges, flats, and sloughs; terrace flats and sloughs in first bottoms; and occasionally on new lands or fronts (Eyre 1980). In terms of hydrology, this is a Zone IV community (Wharton et al. 1982). Short-term, shallow flooding occurs seasonally/periodically within this community. Soils are clay or silt loams that are seasonally inundated or saturated for 1 or 2 months during the growing season, with a 50-100% annual frequency (Eyre 1980, Smith and Craig 1990). Alluvial deposition and nutrient input occurs, but less than in more frequently flooded forest types (Schafale and Weakley 1990).

Soils include dominantly level or nearly level soils that formed in water-laid clayey or loamy sediments on floodplains of the Mississippi and other rivers and large perennial streams in the Coastal Plain. They are Aquepts, Aqualfs, and Aquents. Haplaquepts, Ochraqualfs, Fluvaquents, Natraqualfs, and Hapludalfs are found in backswamp areas and older natural levees. Dystrochrepts, Udifluvents, and Fluvaquents occur in smaller areas. Hydraquents are in southern Louisiana. These soils have a udic or aquic moisture regime, thermic temperature regime, and montmorillonitic or mixed mineralogy. These soils formed in alluvium and are deep, medium-textured, and have adequate or excessive moisture available for vegetation during the growing season (McNab and Avers 1994). Bedrock is deeply buried Paleozoic sandstone or stratified Cenozoic marine deposits.

Geographic Range: This green ash - American elm - sugarberry community is found throughout the central and southern United States on floodplains of major rivers from Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, north to southern Illinois and adjacent Indiana, east to Tennessee, and south to Louisiana. The range formerly included states of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, but now see ~Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana / Carpinus caroliniana / Boehmeria cylindrica Floodplain Forest (CEGL007806)$$.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, IL, IN, KY, LA, MO, MS, OK, TN, TX?




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: merged

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana - Celtis laevigata / Ilex decidua Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001)
< Eastern Broadleaf and Needleleaf Forests: 113: Southern Floodplain Forest (Quercus-Nyssa-Taxodium) (Küchler 1964)
< IIA6d. Sugarberry - American Elm - Green Ash Bottomland Forest (Allard 1990)
? P1B3cIV9a. Celtis laevigata - Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana (Foti et al. 1994)
< Sugarberry - American Elm - Green Ash: 93 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): J.E. Mohan

Author of Description: M. Guetersloh, M. Pyne and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-24-00

  • ALNHP [Alabama Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data on file. Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Auburn University.
  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Collingwood, G. H., and W. D. Brush. 1984. Knowing your trees. The American Forestry Association, Washington, DC. 391 pp.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Hoagland, B. W. 1997. Preliminary plant community classification for Oklahoma. Unpublished draft document, version 35629. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory, Norman. 47 pp.
  • Homoya, M. A., J. Aldrich, J. Bacone, L. Casebere, and T. Post. 1988. Indiana natural community classification. Indiana Natural Heritage Program, Indianapolis, IN. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Hop, K., M. Pyne, T. Foti, S. Lubinski, R. White, and J. Dieck. 2012a. National Park Service vegetation inventory program: Buffalo National River, Arkansas. Natural Resource Report NPS/HTLN/NRR--2012/526. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 340 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • LNHP [Louisiana Natural Heritage Program]. 2009. Natural communities of Louisiana. Louisiana Natural Heritage Program, Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Baton Rouge. 46 pp. [http://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/page_wildlife/6776-Rare%20Natural%20Communities/LA_NAT_COM.pdf]
  • MSNHP [Mississippi Natural Heritage Program]. 2006. Ecological communities of Mississippi. Museum of Natural Science, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Jackson, MS. 9 pp.
  • Nelson, P. 2010. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Revised edition. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Nordman, C. 2004a. Vascular plant community classification for Stones River National Battlefield. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 64 pp. plus appendices and CD.
  • Nordman, C., M. Russo, and L. Smart. 2011. Vegetation types of the Natchez Trace Parkway, based on the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe Central Databases (International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications). Arlington, VA. Data current as of 11 April 2011. 548 pp.
  • Penfound, W. T. 1948. An analysis of an elm-ash floodplain community near Norman, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 28:59-60.
  • Penfound, W. T. 1953. Plant communities of Oklahoma lakes. Ecology 34:561-583.
  • Rice, E. L., and W. T. Penfound. 1956. Composition of a green ash forest near Norman, Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 1:145-147.
  • Rosson, J. F. 1995. The timberland and woodland resources of central and western Oklahoma. Southern Forest Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, LA.
  • Smith, L. M., and N. J. Craig. 1990. The natural communities of Louisiana. Revised edition. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Natural Heritage Program, Baton Rouge. 23 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1995a. A classification and description of plant communities in southern Illinois. Report by the Southern Illinois Field Office, Ullin, IL, and the Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Voigt, J. W., and R. H. Mohlenbrock. 1964. Plant communities of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 202 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H., W. M. Kitchens, E. C. Pendleton, and T. W. Sipe. 1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. FWS/OBS-81/37. Washington, DC.
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.