Print Report
CEGL001770 Distichlis spicata Alkaline Wet Meadow
Type Concept Sentence: Vegetation cover is sparse to dense and dominated by Distichlis spicata, occurring in nearly pure stands, with minor cover of associated graminoids. These grasslands occur in semi-arid and arid western North America from southern Saskatchewan, Canada, to Mexico.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Saltgrass Alkaline Wet Meadow
Colloquial Name: Saltgrass Saline Prairie
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: These grasslands occur in semi-arid and arid western North America from southern Saskatchewan, Canada, to Mexico. Vegetation cover is sparse to dense and is dominated by Distichlis spicata, occurring in nearly pure stands. Minor cover of associated graminoids may include Muhlenbergia asperifolia, Hordeum jubatum, Pascopyrum smithii, Sporobolus airoides, Carex filifolia, Eleocharis palustris, Puccinellia nuttalliana, and Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis. Associated forbs, such as Iva axillaris, Helianthus spp., Asteraceae spp. (from lower salinity sites), Salicornia rubra, Triglochin maritima, and Suaeda spp., may also be present. Shrubs are rare, but scattered Atriplex canescens and Sarcobatus vermiculatus may be present. Stands are found in lowland habitats such as playas, swales, and terraces along washes that are typically intermittently to seasonally flooded. The flooding is usually the result of highly localized thunderstorms or winter rains which can flood one basin and leave the next dry. However, this association may also occur in other flood regimes (temporarily and semipermanently). Soil texture ranges from clay loam, silty loam, to sandy clay. These soils are often deep, saline and alkaline. They generally have an impermeable layer and therefore are poorly drained. When the soil is dry, the surface usually has salt accumulations. Salinity is likely more important than flooding as an environmental factor.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This association is defined as a PNV vegetation type. This graminoid association is characteristically dominated by Distichlis spicata. Closely related communities include ~Pascopyrum smithii - Distichlis spicata Wet Meadow (CEGL001580)$$, ~Sporobolus airoides - Distichlis spicata Wet Meadow (CEGL001687)$$, and several others.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Cover is sparse to dense and is dominated by Distichlis spicata, occurring in nearly pure stands. Stands have higher diversity and cover during wet years and near boundaries with other vegetation types. Higher soil salinity favors Distichlis spicata over less salt-tolerant species. However, very high salinity will dwarf the Distichlis spicata and reduce cover. Generally, vegetation height and cover and species diversity tend to vary inversely with salinity on the plains but may increase on very saline sites (Brotherson 1987). Minor cover of associated graminoids may include Muhlenbergia asperifolia, Hordeum jubatum, Pascopyrum smithii, Sporobolus airoides, Carex filifolia, Eleocharis palustris, Puccinellia nuttalliana, and Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus). Associated forbs, such as Iva axillaris, Helianthus spp. and Asteraceae spp. (from lower salinity sites), Chenopodium sp., Lappula occidentalis, Rumex hymenosepalus, Salicornia rubra, Triglochin maritima, and Suaeda spp., may also be present. Shrubs are rare, but scattered Atriplex canescens, Atriplex confertifolia, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, Ericameria nauseosa, Gutierrezia sarothrae, and Sarcobatus vermiculatus may be present. Introduced species are present in some stands and may include Bromus tectorum, Elymus repens, Lepidium latifolium, Lepidium perfoliatum, Bassia scoparia (= Kochia scoparia), and occasionally Tamarix spp.
Dynamics: The intermittent flooding regime combined with the high evaporation rate in these dry climates causes accumulations of soluble salts in the soil. Total vegetation cover (density and height), species composition, and soil salinity depend on the amount and timing of precipitation and flooding. Growth-inhibiting salt concentrations are diluted when the soil is saturated, allowing the growth of less salt-tolerant species and more robust growth of Distichlis spicata. As the saturated soils dry, the salt concentrates until it precipitates on the soil surface (Dodd and Coupland 1966, Ungar 1968). This osmotic stress of growing in alkaline and saline soils is compensated by the accumulation of proline by some halophytic species including Distichlis spicata. This aids the plants'' water uptake by increasing the osmotic potential of the plant (Shupe et al. 1986). Vegetation forms zones at some saline sites, where species abundance is stratified by salt tolerance (Ungar et al. 1969, Shupe et al. 1986). In playas, the soil salinity at field capacity generally increases from the edge to the center allowing for several different vegetation stands to co-occur (Ungar 1967, 1970, Ungar et al. 1969). Microtopography can also affect vegetation structure. Where soil accumulates to form hummocks, less salt- and alkali-tolerant plants can occur (Ungar 1972, Johnston 1987).
Brotherson (1987) studied species in a saline meadow adjacent to the Great Salt Lake in Utah and found 5 vegetation zones all with Distichlis spicata present. The meadow sloped down and away from the shoreline for the first 4 zones, then up for the last. Soil pH and soluble salt levels followed the slope pattern with the lowest zone (4) having lower pH and salt concentrations and the highest cover of Distichlis spicata (99%) almost exclusively. The other higher salt zones were codominated by other species such as Suaeda calceoliformis, Puccinellia nuttalliana, Salicornia rubra, Triglochin maritima, Glaux maritima, or Eleocharis palustris. Zone 5 was dominated by Eleocharis palustris and had additional moisture from a nearby seep. The salts were concentrated in the higher elevation zones because of evaporation of the salt-laden water that was leached from the lower lying areas.
The warm-season grass Distichlis spicata is rhizomatous, tolerant of moderate grazing, and its roots resist trampling. Although relatively unpalatable, it can provide valuable winter forage for livestock, if needed. When grazed, Distichlis spicata generally increases because of reduced competition from other less grazing-tolerant species. If grazed heavily, Distichlis spicata will decline and may be replaced by less desirable warm-season grasses such as tumblegrass, Schedonnardus paniculatus, or Hordeum jubatum (Costello 1944b, Jones and Walford 1995). Weeds are generally not a problem because few grow well in saline soils. However, severely disturbed sites are susceptible to invasion by introduced species such as Bromus tectorum, Lepidium latifolium, Lepidium perfoliatum, and Bassia hyssopifolia (Franklin and Dyrness 1973).
Brotherson (1987) studied species in a saline meadow adjacent to the Great Salt Lake in Utah and found 5 vegetation zones all with Distichlis spicata present. The meadow sloped down and away from the shoreline for the first 4 zones, then up for the last. Soil pH and soluble salt levels followed the slope pattern with the lowest zone (4) having lower pH and salt concentrations and the highest cover of Distichlis spicata (99%) almost exclusively. The other higher salt zones were codominated by other species such as Suaeda calceoliformis, Puccinellia nuttalliana, Salicornia rubra, Triglochin maritima, Glaux maritima, or Eleocharis palustris. Zone 5 was dominated by Eleocharis palustris and had additional moisture from a nearby seep. The salts were concentrated in the higher elevation zones because of evaporation of the salt-laden water that was leached from the lower lying areas.
The warm-season grass Distichlis spicata is rhizomatous, tolerant of moderate grazing, and its roots resist trampling. Although relatively unpalatable, it can provide valuable winter forage for livestock, if needed. When grazed, Distichlis spicata generally increases because of reduced competition from other less grazing-tolerant species. If grazed heavily, Distichlis spicata will decline and may be replaced by less desirable warm-season grasses such as tumblegrass, Schedonnardus paniculatus, or Hordeum jubatum (Costello 1944b, Jones and Walford 1995). Weeds are generally not a problem because few grow well in saline soils. However, severely disturbed sites are susceptible to invasion by introduced species such as Bromus tectorum, Lepidium latifolium, Lepidium perfoliatum, and Bassia hyssopifolia (Franklin and Dyrness 1973).
Environmental Description: These grasslands occur in semi-arid and arid western North America on saline and alkaline soils from southern Saskatchewan, Canada, to Mexico. Elevation ranges from 1000-2300 m (3280-7545 feet). Stands are found in lowland habitats such as playas, swales, floodplains, and terraces along washes that are typically intermittently or seasonally flooded. The flooding is usually the result of highly localized thunderstorms or winter rains which can flood one basin and leave the next dry. However, this association may also occur in other flood regimes (temporarily and semipermanently). Soil texture ranges from clay loam, silty loam, to sandy clay (Johnston 1987). These soils are often deep, saline and alkaline. They generally have an impermeable layer and therefore are poorly drained. When the soil is dry, the surface usually has salt accumulations. Salinity is likely more important than flooding as an environmental factor.
Geographic Range: This grassland association occurs in low areas in semi-arid and arid western North America from southern Saskatchewan, Canada, west to Washington and south to Arizona, Utah, California, New Mexico, and possibly northern Mexico.
Nations: CA,MX?,US
States/Provinces: AZ, CA, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, SK, UT, WA, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.683374
Confidence Level: High
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G5
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.C Shrub & Herb Wetland Subclass | S44 | 2.C |
Formation | 2.C.5 Salt Marsh Formation | F035 | 2.C.5 |
Division | 2.C.5.Nd North American Western Interior Brackish Marsh, Playa & Shrubland Division | D036 | 2.C.5.Nd |
Macrogroup | 2.C.5.Nd.1 Warm & Cool Desert Alkali-Saline Marsh, Playa & Shrubland Macrogroup | M082 | 2.C.5.Nd.1 |
Group | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a Saltgrass - Lemmon''s Alkali Grass - Saltwort species Alkaline-Saline Marsh & Playa Group | G538 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Alliance | A1332 Saltgrass Alkaline Wet Meadow Alliance | A1332 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Association | CEGL001770 Saltgrass Alkaline Wet Meadow | CEGL001770 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: < Distichlis spicata ssp. stricta Salt Meadow Plant Association (Baker 1984a)
= Distichlis spicata var. spicata (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Evens et al. 2014)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Buck-Diaz et al. 2012)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Rodriguez et al. 2017)
= Distichlis spicata Habitat Type (Hansen et al. 1995)
= Distichlis spicata Herbaceous Vegetation (Carsey et al. 2003a)
< Distichlis spicata Vegetation Zone I (Ralston 1969)
< Distichlis stricta Associations on Saline-Alkaline Soils (Franklin and Dyrness 1973)
= Distichlis stricta Habitat Type (Daubenmire 1970) [(p.45)]
< Distichlis Meadow (Graham 1937)
= Inland Saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) Dominance Type (Jones and Walford 1995)
= Inland Saltgrass Monotype CT (Muldavin et al. 2000a)
= Inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata var. spicata) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)
< Saltgrass Series (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995)
= Saltgrass Zone (4) (Brotherson 1987)
= The Salt-grass Association (Vestal 1914)
= Distichlis spicata var. spicata (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Evens et al. 2014)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Buck-Diaz et al. 2012)
= Distichlis spicata Association (Rodriguez et al. 2017)
= Distichlis spicata Habitat Type (Hansen et al. 1995)
= Distichlis spicata Herbaceous Vegetation (Carsey et al. 2003a)
< Distichlis spicata Vegetation Zone I (Ralston 1969)
< Distichlis stricta Associations on Saline-Alkaline Soils (Franklin and Dyrness 1973)
= Distichlis stricta Habitat Type (Daubenmire 1970) [(p.45)]
< Distichlis Meadow (Graham 1937)
= Inland Saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) Dominance Type (Jones and Walford 1995)
= Inland Saltgrass Monotype CT (Muldavin et al. 2000a)
= Inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata var. spicata) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)
< Saltgrass Series (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995)
= Saltgrass Zone (4) (Brotherson 1987)
= The Salt-grass Association (Vestal 1914)
- Baker, W. L. 1984a. A preliminary classification of the natural vegetation of Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 44(4):647-676.
- Beatley, J. C. 1976. Vascular plants of the Nevada Test Site and central-southern Nevada: Ecological and geographic distributions. Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration. TID-26881. Prepared for Division of Biomedical and Environmental Research. 297 pp.
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- Brotherson, J. D. 1987. Plant community zonation in response to soil gradients in a saline meadow near Utah Lake, Utah County, Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 47(2):322-333.
- Buck-Diaz, J., S. Batiuk, and J. M. Evens. 2012. Vegetation alliances and associations of the Great Valley ecoregion, California. California Native Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/pdf/great_valley_eco-vegclass2012.pdf]
- Bunin, J. E. 1985. Vegetation of the City of Boulder, Colorado open space lands. Report prepared for the City of Boulder, Real Estate/Open Space, Boulder, CO. 114 pp.
- CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
- CNPS [California Native Plant Society]. 2015b. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). Rare Plant Program, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://www.rareplants.cnps.org].
- Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
- Christy, J. A. 2013. Wet meadow plant associations, Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Harney County, Oregon. Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland.
- Cogan, D., and J. E. Taylor. 2014. Manzanar National Historic Site: Vegetation classification and mapping project report. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/MANZ/NRTR--2014/868. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 170 pp.
- Coles, J., D. Cogan, D. Salas, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, J. Von Loh, and A. Evenden. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Dinosaur National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR-2008/112. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 814 pp.
- Costello, D. F. 1944b. Important species of the major forage types in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Monographs 14:107-134.
- Crouch, G. L. 1961a. Wildlife populations and habitat conditions on grazed and ungrazed bottomlands in Logan County, Colorado. Unpublished thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Daniels, F. P. 1911. The flora of Boulder, Colorado and vicinity. University of Missouri Studies, Science Series II(2):8-48.
- Daubenmire, R. F. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 62. 131 pp.
- Dodd, J. D., and R. T. Coupland. 1966. Vegetation of saline areas in Saskatchewan. Ecology 47(6):958-968.
- Erixson, J., D. Cogan, and J. Von Loh. 2011b. Vegetation inventory project report: Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area. Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR--2011/434 National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Evens, J. M., K. Sikes, D. Hastings, and J. Ratchford. 2014. Vegetation alliance descriptions for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Death Valley National Park and Mojave National Preserve. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
- Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. General Technical Report PNW-8. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. 417 pp.
- Graham, E. H. 1937. Botanical studies in the Uinta Basin of Utah and Colorado. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 26:28-432.
- HDR. 2014. Vegetation classification and mapping, Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, California. Unpublished report prepared by HDR for Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, San Diego, CA.
- Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
- Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
- Hyder, D. N., R. E. Bement, E. E. Remmenga, and C. Terwilliger, Jr. 1966. Vegetation-soils and vegetation-grazing relations from frequency data. Journal of Range Management 19:11-17.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
- Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
- Jones, G. P., and G. M. Walford. 1995. Major riparian vegetation types of eastern Wyoming. Submitted to Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 245 pp.
- Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
- Keeler-Wolf, T., and M. Vaghti. 2000. Vegetation mapping of Suisun Marsh, Solano County, California. A report to the California Department of Water Resources. California Department of Fish and Game, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, CA.
- Kittel, G. M., and N. D. Lederer. 1993. A preliminary classification of the riparian vegetation of the Yampa and San Miguel/Dolores river basins. Unpublished report prepared for Colorado Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency by The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder.
- Kittel, G., E. Reyes, J. Evens, J. Buck, and D. Johnson. 2012a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Pinnacles National Monument. Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR-2012/574. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 428 pp.
- Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, A. McMullen, and J. Sanderson. 1999b. A classification of riparian and wetland plant associations of Colorado: A user''s guide to the classification project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO. 70 pp. plus appendices.
- Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, N. Lederer, and D. Randolph. 1994. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the White and Colorado River basins, Colorado. Final report submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Boulder. 166 pp.
- Klipple, G. E., and D. F. Costello. 1960. Vegetation and cattle responses to different intensities of grazing on short-grass ranges of the central Great Plains. Technical Bulletin 1216. USDA Forest Service. 82 pp.
- MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
- Muldavin, E., P. Durkin, M. Bradley, M. Stuever, and P. Mehlhop. 2000a. Handbook of wetland vegetation communities of New Mexico. Volume I: Classification and community descriptions. Final report to the New Mexico Environment Department and the Environmental Protection Agency prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
- Osborn, L. W. 1974. Soil-plant relationships in a saltgrass meadow. Unpublished thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 41 pp.
- Peterson, E. B. 2008. International Vegetation Classification alliances and associations occurring in Nevada with proposed additions. Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Carson City, NV. 348 pp.
- Pickart, A. J. 2006. Vegetation of diked herbaceous wetlands of Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge: Classification, description, and ecology. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Arcata, CA.
- Ralston, G. L. 1969. Plant zonation on dune sands of Washoe Lake, Washoe County, Nevada. Unpublished thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.
- Ramaley, F. 1942. Vegetation of the San Luis Valley in southern Colorado. University of Colorado Studies, Series D, 1:231-277.
- Rodriguez, D., K. G. Sikes, T. Keeler-Wolf, G. Kittel, J. Curtis, C. Curley, and J. Evens. 2017. Vegetation classification of Channel Islands National Park. Report to the National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Rogers, C. M. 1953. The vegetation of the Mesa de Maya region of Colorado, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. Lloydia 16(4):257-290.
- Salas, D. E., J. Stevens, K. Schulz, M. Artmann, B. Friesen, S. Blauer, E. W. Schweiger, and A. Valdez. 2010b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2010/179. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
- Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 471 pp.
- Schulz, K. A., and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, CO. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H.
- Shanks, D. L. 1977. Aerial photo densitometry for rangeland planning and evaluation. Unpublished thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 66 pp.
- Shupe, J. B., J. D. Brotherson, and S. R. Rushforth. 1986. Patterns of vegetation surrounding springs in Goshen Bay, Utah County, Utah, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 139:97-107.
- Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Range site descriptions for Colorado. Technical Guide, Section II-E. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Colorado State Office, Denver.
- Solomeshch, A., and M. Barbour. 2006. Defining restoration targets for Great Valley Grassland State Park. Grasslands 16:1, 12-17.
- Stearns-Roger, Inc. 1978. Rawhide Energy Project. Transmission system, ecological investigations. Volume II. Technical baseline report to Platte River Power Authority. 51 pp.
- Tendick, A., J. Coles, K. Decker, M. Hall, J. Von Loh, T. Belote, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2012. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Canyonlands National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2012/577. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Tendick, A., J. Spence, M. Reid, K. Shulz, G. Kittel, K. Green, A. Wight, and G. Wakefield. 2017. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2017/1500. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 1464 pp.
- Thorne, R. F. 1976. The vascular plant communities of California. Pages 1-31 in: J. Latting, editor. Plant communities of southern California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
- Tuhy, J. S., and S. Jensen. 1982. Riparian classification for the Upper Salmon and Middle Fork Salmon River drainages, Idaho. Unpublished report prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region by White Horse Associates, Smithfield, UT. 183 pp.
- Ungar, I. A. 1967. Vegetation-soil relationships on saline soils in northern Kansas. The American Midland Naturalist 78(1):98-121.
- Ungar, I. A. 1968. Species-soil relationships on the Great Salt Plains of northern Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 80(2):392-407.
- Ungar, I. A. 1970. Species-soil relationships on sulfate dominated soils of South Dakota. The American Midland Naturalist 83(2):343-357.
- Ungar, I. A., W. Hogan, and M. McClennand. 1969. Plant communities of saline soils at Lincoln, Nebraska. The American Midland Naturalist 82(2):564-577.
- Vestal, A. G. 1914. Prairie vegetation of a mountain-front area in Colorado. Botanical Gazette 58(5):377-400.
- Von Loh, J., D. Cogan, K. Schulz, D. Crawford, T. Meyer, J. Pennell, and M. Pucherelli. 2002. USGS-USFWS Vegetation Mapping Program, Ouray National Wildlife Refuge, Utah. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Technical Memorandum 8260-02-03. Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO. 225 pp.
- WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
- Weaver, J. E., and F. W. Albertson. 1956. Grasslands of the Great Plains: Their nature and use. Johnsen Publishing Co., Lincoln, NE. 395 pp.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
- Zedler, J. B., C. S. Nordby, and B. E. Kus. 1992. The ecology of Tijuana estuary, California: A national estuarine research reserve. Unpublished report. NOAA, Office of Coastal Resources Management, Sanctuaries and Reserves Division, Washington, DC.
- Zedler, J. B., J. C. Callaway, J. S. Desmond, G. Vivian-Smith, G. D. Williams, G. Sullivan, A. E. Brewster, and B. K. Bradshaw. 1999. California salt-marsh vegetation: An improved model of spatial pattern. Ecosystems 2:19-35.