Print Report

CEGL004188 Schoenoplectus pungens Tidal Salt Marsh

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Common Threesquare Tidal Salt Marsh

Colloquial Name: Atlantic Coast Brackish Tidal Marsh

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association occurs on fresh to brackish, mid-tidal, sandy/gravelly rivershores along the north and mid-Atlantic coast. It occurs in low areas where there is a longer duration of flooding. Wave and ice scour can have a significant influence on the year-to-year appearance of the vegetation, which tends to be sparse. This vegetation often occurs in nearly pure stands of Schoenoplectus pungens but can be intermixed with Spartina alterniflora or Spartina cynosuroides in more brackish areas. Species diversity tends to be low due to winter storm scour, but associates can include Amaranthus cannabinus, Polygonum punctatum, Cyperus bipartitus, and Bidens spp. Sagittaria graminea, Sagittaria latifolia, Eleocharis palustris, Gratiola virginiana, Elatine americana, Isoetes riparia, and Cyperus bipartitus can occur, but are absent in the northern part of the range. As the salinity decreases Zizania aquatica can also be an associate.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This vegetation often occurs in nearly pure stands of Schoenoplectus pungens (= Scirpus pungens) but can be intermixed with Spartina alterniflora or Spartina cynosuroides in slightly brackish areas. Species diversity tends to be low due to winter storm scour, but associates can include Amaranthus cannabinus, Polygonum punctatum, and Bidens spp. Sagittaria graminea, Sagittaria latifolia, Eleocharis palustris (= Eleocharis smallii), Gratiola virginiana, Elatine americana, Isoetes riparia, and Cyperus bipartitus (= Cyperus rivularis) can occur but are absent in the northern part of the range. As the salinity decreases Zizania aquatica can also be an associate. At the southern end of the range in Maryland and Virginia, this type is more confined to fresh tidal shores. Here, Schoenoplectus pungens is often abundant, but composition is variable, and patch-dominants can also include Polygonum punctatum, Justicia americana, and Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani.

Dynamics:  The species composition of brackish marsh associations is likely related to gradients in salinity and duration of tidal flooding. Schoenoplectus pungens may dominate in areas with higher average water levels, lower salinities, and lower frequency of flooding than areas typically dominated by Spartina patens.

Environmental Description:  This association occurs in fresh to brackish reaches of tidal rivers with sandy or gravelly rivershores. It occurs in low areas where there is a longer duration of flooding. Ice-scour can have a significant effect on the species composition and percent cover from year to year.

Geographic Range: This association occurs along the Atlantic coast from New Hampshire to Maryland.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, MD, NH, NJ, PA




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Eleocharis quadrangulata - Pontederia cordata - Schoenoplectus (pungens, tabernaemontani) (Coulling 2002)
> Peltandra virginica - Echinochloa walteri - Schoenoplectus (pungens, tabernaemontani) (Coulling 2002)
> Schoenoplectus pungens - Sagittaria spp. community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
> Schoenoplectus pungens - Schoenoplectus robustus community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
? Schoenoplectus pungens Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation (Fleming 2007)
= Scirpus pungens Herbaceous Vegetation (Bartgis 1986)
? Scirpus marsh community (brackish mid-tidal marsh border) (Barrett 1989)
? Brackish Tidal Marsh (Rawinski 1984a) [formerly Southern New England and Gulf of Maine.]

Concept Author(s): Eastern Ecology Group

Author of Description: S.L. Neid and G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-17-17

  • Barrett, N. E. 1989. Vegetation of the tidal wetlands of the lower Connecticut River: Ecological relationships of plant community-types with respect to flooding and habitat. M.S. thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs. 209 pp.
  • Bartgis, R. 1986. Natural community descriptions. Unpublished draft. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis.
  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Caldwell, F. A. 1990. A floristic and vegetation analysis of a freshwater-tidal marsh on the Merrimack River, West Newbury, Massachusetts. Master''s thesis, University of New Hampshire. 96 pp.
  • Coulling, P. P. 2002. A preliminary classification of tidal marsh, shrub swamp, and hardwood swamp vegetation and assorted non-tidal, chiefly non-maritime, herbaceous wetland communities of the Virginia Coastal Plain. October 2002. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-18. 30 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2007. Ecological communities of the Potomac Gorge in Virginia: Composition, floristics, and environmental dynamics. Natural Heritage Technical Report 07-12. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 341 pp. plus appendices.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Metzler, K., and R. Rosza. 1982. Vegetation of fresh and brackish tidal marshes in Connecticut. Newsletter of the Connecticut Botanical Society 10(1):1-3.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Rhoads, A. F., and T. A. Block. 2011c. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Riverbank Freshwater Tidal Marsh Factsheet. Morris Arboretum. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=30024] (accessed February 13, 2012)
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Zimmerman, E. A., T. Davis, M. A. Furedi, B. Eichelberger, J. McPherson, S. Seymour, G. Podniesinski, N. Dewar, and J. Wagner, editors. 2012. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Communities.aspx]