Print Report

CEGL002419 Nyssa aquatica Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Water Tupelo Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Water Tupelo Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This semipermanently flooded water tupelo swamp forest is found in the Coastal Plain from Virginia south to Florida, west to Texas, and north in the Mississippi delta region to Missouri, Illinois, and Kentucky. Stands occur on permanently saturated soils on low, wet flats and sloughs, swales and backswamps, and the association is more common on floodplains of brownwater, rather than blackwater, rivers. Both organic and mineral soils may be present. The vegetation is dominated by dense, and occasionally pure, stands of Nyssa aquatica but often in association with Taxodium distichum (never very abundant in this type), Liquidambar styraciflua, Planera aquatica, Nyssa biflora, Gleditsia aquatica, Fraxinus profunda, and Cephalanthus occidentalis. The herbaceous layer is conspicuously sparse, and density is wholly dependent upon the extent and duration of flooding. Where water is permanent, herbaceous plants rely on substrates found on rotting logs, stumps, terraces, and buttresses of trees. Subcanopy density and forest tree recruitment are poor due to fluctuating water levels.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: More work needs to be done to understand development of this community where the ranges of Nyssa aquatica and Taxodium distichum overlap, to determine the differences between this and a Nyssa aquatica-dominated forest that develops following logging of Taxodium distichum, and to determine the extent of geographic variation. Where bald-cypress and water tupelo ranges overlap, little is known about conditions which select for either or both species. Selective removal of bald-cypress can shift dominance in mixed bald-cypress - water tupelo stands to favor water tupelo. Water tupelo seem to select transitional zones between permanent water and upland habitat and seldom occur as a dominant component of the canopy where inundation is semipermanent or permanent.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation is dominated by dense, and occasionally pure, stands of Nyssa aquatica but often in association with Taxodium distichum (never very abundant in this type), Liquidambar styraciflua, Planera aquatica, Nyssa biflora, Gleditsia aquatica, Fraxinus profunda, and Cephalanthus occidentalis. The herbaceous layer is conspicuously sparse, and density is wholly dependent upon the extent and duration of flooding. Where water is permanent, herbaceous plants rely on substrates found on rotting logs, stumps, terraces, and buttresses of trees. Some herbs which may be present at low densities on these elevated places include Phanopyrum gymnocarpon, Pluchea camphorata, Boehmeria cylindrica, Rudbeckia laciniata, Sagittaria latifolia, Onoclea sensibilis, Triadenum walteri, Carex joorii, Carex glaucescens, Asclepias perennis, Saururus cernuus, Justicia ovata, Leersia lenticularis, and others. The exotic plant species Eichhornia crassipes may a problem. Subcanopy density and forest tree recruitment are poor due to fluctuating water levels (TNC 1995a).

At Shiloh National Military Park (western Tennessee) this occurs with vegetation open-canopied, due to beaver activity (both impounding and chewing of bark which has killed trees). The dominant canopy tree is Nyssa aquatica. Salix nigra is also present in the canopy. Acer rubrum is the only subcanopy tree. Shrubs are fairly dense; Acer rubrum, Alnus serrulata, Cornus foemina, and Itea virginica are the most important, with Nyssa aquatica, Cephalanthus occidentalis, and Salix nigra. Polygonum sagittatum, Leersia oryzoides, Microstegium vimineum, Impatiens capensis, and Polygonum punctatum are the dominant herbaceous plants. Other herbs are Scirpus cyperinus, Mikania scandens, Boehmeria cylindrica, Cicuta maculata, Apios americana, Triadenum walteri, Cinna arundinacea, Sagittaria latifolia (= Sagittaria longirostra), Erechtites hieraciifolius, Ludwigia decurrens, Peltandra virginica, Carex crinita, Commelina virginica, Bidens aristosa (= Bidens polylepis), Carex lupulina, Panicum dichotomiflorum, Bidens frondosa, Ceratophyllum demersum, Pilea pumila, Heteranthera reniformis, Saururus cernuus, Cuscuta gronovii, Gratiola virginiana, Ludwigia peploides ssp. glabrescens, Eclipta prostrata (= Eclipta alba), Galium tinctorium, Lobelia cardinalis, and the exotic Arthraxon hispidus.

This community most commonly occurs in seasonally flooded riparian wetlands or lakes, where standing water is absent during parts of the year. Timing, duration, and depth of flooding are the major environmental factors governing vegetative composition within and among occurrences of forested swamps. Water tupelo is more commonly associated with riparian floodplain wetlands or margins of lakes or ponds where standing water occurs for only a few months of each year (usually winter and spring). Bald-cypress is more commonly associated with permanent deep-water forested wetlands.

Dynamics:  This is a climax wetland community. Flooding frequency is approximately 100% of years, and flooding duration is approximately 100% of the growing season. Seasonal (spring and fall) flood pulses contribute to channel scouring and deposition of organic matter (where slackwater and pooling of floodwaters occur). Flooding also provides water which persists during dry periods, although dewatering during summer months is not uncommon. Seasonal flooding and permanent water require special adaptations by vegetation to exist in this extremely dynamic ecosystem. Many plants have highly specialized methods to facilitate acquisition and transport of oxygen during periods of prolonged inundation. Neither bald-cypress nor water tupelo are able to germinate in water and require dry periods to produce seedlings. Seedlings are unable to survive complete submergence, and prolonged flooding with excessive water levels can kill even mature trees. Subcanopy and herbaceous components of this community are very dynamic, and densities fluctuate with availability of substrate.

Nyssa aquatica swamps occur most commonly in riparian zones subject to seasonal hydrologic pulses. Inundation is usually more than 6 months of the year and is greatest during spring and fall. Timing, duration, depth, and extent of flooding greatly affect community composition. Deeper, more permanent flooding conditions seem to select for bald-cypress. Prolonged drought can create conditions favorable for tupelo recruitment. In addition, Nyssa aquatica may replace Taxodium distichum on some sites because bald-cypress has minimal sprouting ability, erratic reproduction, and slower growth (Wharton et al. 1982). Prolonged flooding can increase senescence of seedlings and saplings, removing all but older mature timber. These open areas, while quickly colonized during subsequent dry years, are very dynamic until the hydrology stabilizes sufficiently long to select for a specific species.

Environmental Description:  Stands of this association occur on permanently saturated soils on low, wet flats and sloughs, swales and backswamps. The association is more common on floodplains of brownwater, rather than blackwater, rivers. Both organic and mineral soils may be present. Soil moisture is abundant and fairly permanent, often with a shallow impermeable clay layer which creates a shallow, perched water table. Anaerobic conditions are prevalent, with considerable gleying due to reduction of iron and manganese. Root zones often exhibit iron mottling and concretions. Soils are generally acidic (4.0-6.0 pH), with low nutrient availability. Historically, periods of flooding and drought have determined community dominance. Sediment deposition also modifies swamp forest communities by decreasing water depth. Excessive sedimentation can speed the natural transition of wetlands as they evolve to a drier condition. Bedrock is deeply buried Paleozoic rock, exhibiting little or no effect on community structure or composition. Unconsolidated alluvial sediments need further characterization.

Geographic Range: This water tupelo swamp forest is found on the lower Atlantic Coastal Plain from southeastern Virginia to southeastern Georgia, the Gulf Coastal Plain from about Tallahassee, Florida, west to southeastern Texas, the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain to southern Illinois and southeastern Missouri, and the Arkansas River Valley in central Arkansas.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, FL, GA, IL, KY, LA, MO, MS, SC, TN, TX




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Nyssa aquatica - Taxodium distichum swamp (Robertson et al. 1984) [Robertson et al. (1984) appear to include pure Nyssa aquatica and some mixed Nyssa aquatica - Taxodium distichum stands in this type.]
= Nyssa aquatica Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001)
< Taxodium - Nyssa aquatica / Rosa palustris community (Voigt and Mohlenbrock 1964)
< Eastern Broadleaf and Needleleaf Forests: 113: Southern Floodplain Forest (Quercus-Nyssa-Taxodium) (Küchler 1964)
< IIA4d. Tupelo Swamp (Allard 1990)
? P1B3dII3a. Nyssa aquatica (Foti et al. 1994)
< Water Tupelo - Swamp Tupelo: 103 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): S. Landaal

Author of Description: S. Landaal, D. Faber-Langendoen and R.E. Evans

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 08-12-04

  • ALNHP [Alabama Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data on file. Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Auburn University.
  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Applequist, M. B. 1959. A study of soil and site factors affecting the growth and development of swamp blackgum and tupelo gum stands in southeastern Georgia. D.F. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC. 180 pp.
  • Burk, J. H. 1977. Sonoran Desert vegetation. Pages 869-889 in: M. G. Barbour and J. Major, editors. Terrestrial vegetation of California. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990b. Silvics of North America. Volume 2: Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 877 pp.
  • Chafin, L. 2011. Georgia''s natural communities and associated rare plant and animal species: Thumbnail accounts. Based on "Guide to the Natural Communities of Georgia," by Edwards et al. 2013. University of Georgia Press. Georgia Nongame Conservation Section, Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 125 pp.
  • Christensen, N. L. 1988. Vegetation of the southeastern Coastal Plain. Pages 317-363 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Demaree, D. 1932. Submerging experiments with Taxodium. Ecology 13:258-262.
  • Dennis, J. V. 1988. The great cypress swamps. Louisiana State University Press. 142 pp.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
  • Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
  • Ewel, K. C., and H. T. Odum, editors. 1984b. Cypress swamps. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.
  • Klawitter, R. A. 1962. Sweetgum, swamp tupelo and water tupelo sites in a South Carolina bottomland forest. D.F. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC. 176 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • LNHP [Louisiana Natural Heritage Program]. 2009. Natural communities of Louisiana. Louisiana Natural Heritage Program, Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Baton Rouge. 46 pp. [http://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/page_wildlife/6776-Rare%20Natural%20Communities/LA_NAT_COM.pdf]
  • MSNHP [Mississippi Natural Heritage Program]. 2006. Ecological communities of Mississippi. Museum of Natural Science, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Jackson, MS. 9 pp.
  • Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. 722 pp.
  • NatureServe Ecology - Southeastern United States. No date. Unpublished data. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Nelson, P. 2010. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Revised edition. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Nordman, C., M. Russo, and L. Smart. 2011. Vegetation types of the Natchez Trace Parkway, based on the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe Central Databases (International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications). Arlington, VA. Data current as of 11 April 2011. 548 pp.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Penfound, W. T., and T. F. Hall. 1939. A phytosociological analysis of a tupelo gum forest near Huntsville, Alabama. Ecology 20:358-64.
  • Radford, A. E., and D. L. Martin. 1975. Potential ecological natural landmarks: Piedmont region, eastern United States. University of North Carolina, Department of Botany, Chapel Hill. 249 pp.
  • Robertson, P. A., M. D. MacKenzie, and L. F. Elliott. 1984. Gradient analysis and classification of the woody vegetation for four sites in southern Illinois and adjacent Missouri. Vegetatio 58:87-104.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1995a. A classification and description of plant communities in southern Illinois. Report by the Southern Illinois Field Office, Ullin, IL, and the Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Voigt, J. W., and R. H. Mohlenbrock. 1964. Plant communities of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 202 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H. 1989. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Dep. of Natural Resources. Bulletin 114:75-80.
  • Wharton, C. H., W. M. Kitchens, E. C. Pendleton, and T. W. Sipe. 1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. FWS/OBS-81/37. Washington, DC.
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.
  • White, J., and R. C. Anderson. 1970. A cypress swamp outlier in southern Illinois. Illinois State Academy of Science 63(1):6-13.