Print Report
G819 Prosopis glandulosa - Prosopis velutina Warm Desert Ruderal Scrub Group
Type Concept Sentence: This broadly defined ruderal group occurs in Arizona, New Mexico, western Texas and northern Mexico and includes upland desert scrub dominated by exotic shrub species such as Caesalpinia gilliesii or invasive native species (Prosopis glandulosa and Prosopis velutina) with >90% relative cover and >10% absolute shrub cover. Also included are any desert scrub with an herbaceous layer strongly dominated by an exotic herbaceous species (>90% relative cover). Characteristic exotic understory species include Brassica nigra, Brassica tournefortii, Bromus madritensis, Bromus rubens, Cynodon dactylon, Centaurea spp., Eragrostis lehmanniana, Erodium cicutarium, and Schismus barbatus.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Honey Mesquite - Velvet Mesquite Warm Desert Ruderal Scrub Group
Colloquial Name: North American Warm Desert Ruderal Scrub
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: This broadly defined ruderal scrub group occurs in Arizona, New Mexico, western Texas, northern Mexico and elsewhere in the Desert Southwest. It includes upland desert scrub dominated by invasive native species (Prosopis glandulosa and Prosopis velutina) with >95% relative cover and >10% absolute shrub cover that has become widespread in the last century. However, Prosopis spp.-dominated stands that occur naturally (non-ruderal) in desert lowlands, drainages, washes and riparian areas (bosque) are excluded from this ruderal type. Also included in this ruderal group are stands dominated by exotic shrubs such as Caesalpinia gilliesii, as well as any disturbed desert scrub with an herbaceous layer strongly dominated by exotic species (>90% relative cover), such that the former natural community cannot be determined. Characteristic understory species of the upland ruderal mesquite (Prosopis spp.) stands include native desert graminoids that were part of the former native upland vegetation invaded by mesquite. Many exotic species may dominate ruderal stands such as Brassica nigra, Brassica tournefortii, Bromus madritensis, Bromus rubens, Centaurea spp., Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis lehmanniana, Erodium cicutarium, Schismus arabicus, Schismus barbatus, and Sisymbrium altissimum. Stands occur in southeastern Arizona on alluvial fans, ridges, hills and valley floors. The elevation range is 960-1100 m (3150-3600 feet). Climate is warm, semi-arid to arid continental. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 22-28 cm, but can vary greatly from year to year. Drought is not uncommon. Sites occur on gentle to moderate slopes. Substrates are variable but are often well-drained sandy loam.
Diagnostic Characteristics: This broadly defined upland ruderal group occurs in a warm, semi-arid climate in the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico and includes upland mesquite and all desert scrub with an exotic species-dominated understory (>90% relative cover) in the herbaceous layer of at least 10% cover. Characteristic understory species include Brassica nigra, Brassica tournefortii, Bromus madritensis, Bromus rubens, Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis lehmanniana, Erodium cicutarium, Schismus arabicus, Schismus barbatus, and Sorghum halepense with little native composition remaining. Other woody species may include Calliandra eriophylla, Gutierrezia sarothrae, or Isocoma tenuisecta. The ruderal native annual forb Amaranthus palmeri often dominates or codominates disturbed stands.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Heavy grazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s, altered fire regime, climate change, desertification and other factors are thought to have caused mesquite to invade and dominate the upland grasslands where it did not previous occur. Naturally occurring coppice dunes may have been present locally in areas peripheral to active dunes. However, the coppice dunes in the Tularosa Basin and elsewhere are currently extensive, resulting from sand movement due to degradation of desert grasslands. Some of the characteristic species are shared with other ruderal types; however, this type is restricted to warm deserts and the transition zone with the southern Great Basin. Most shrub plots have a native overstory with an exotic herbaceous understory. Most stands of this type are the invasive upland Prosopis spp. scrub with or without an exotic herbaceous understory. Sorghum halepense and Cynodon dactylon grow best in mesic conditions. Stands dominated by these species that occur in riparian areas are not included in this group.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: The physiognomy of this group includes open to dense shrublands and shrub-steppe with a sparse to dense, annual- or perennial-dominated herbaceous layer.
Floristics: This broadly defined ruderal group includes all desert scrub with an exotic species-dominated understory (>90% relative cover) in the herbaceous layer as well as exotic-dominated herbaceous stands. These open to dense grasslands and forblands are composed of either exotic annual or biennial grasses or forbs with low cover of perennial species (<10% absolute cover) or stands with a significant perennial herbaceous layer (>10% absolute cover) strongly dominated by exotics (>90% relative cover) with or without annuals and biennials present to dominant. This group includes upland desert scrub strongly dominated by invasive native species (Prosopis glandulosa and Prosopis velutina) with >95% relative cover and >10% absolute shrub cover. Prosopis spp. that occur naturally (non-ruderal) in desert lowlands, drainages, washes and riparian areas (bosque) are excluded from this ruderal type. Characteristic understory species include Brassica nigra, Brassica tournefortii, Bromus madritensis, Bromus rubens, Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis lehmanniana, Erodium cicutarium, Panicum antidotale, Schismus arabicus, Schismus barbatus, and Sorghum halepense with little native composition remaining. Other woody species may include Calliandra eriophylla, Gutierrezia sarothrae, or Isocoma tenuisecta. Gutierrezia microcephala is abundant in some stands. Remnant desert grasses include Aristida ternipes, Bouteloua chondrosioides, Bouteloua curtipendula, Bouteloua eriopoda, Bouteloua rothrockii, Digitaria californica, and Eragrostis intermedia. Other common herbaceous species include Allionia incarnata, Ambrosia confertiflora, Boerhavia erecta, Mollugo verticillata, Cylindropuntia versicolor (= Opuntia versicolor), Panicum hirticaule, Polygala barbeyana, Proboscidea parviflora, and Phemeranthus aurantiacus (= Talinum aurantiacum). Other associated species such as Chenopodium berlandieri, Chloris virgata, Eragrostis cilianensis, Eragrostis pectinacea, Eriochloa acuminata, Ipomoea spp., Kallstroemia grandiflora, Leptochloa panicea ssp. brachiata (= Leptochloa filiformis), Salsola kali, and Solanum elaeagnifolium are often present. The ruderal native annual forb Amaranthus palmeri often dominates or codominates disturbed stands.
Dynamics: During the last century, the area occupied by the ruderal upland mesquite-dominated desert thornscrub group has increased through conversion of desert grasslands as a result of drought, overgrazing and Prosopis glandulosa seed dispersion by livestock, and/or decreases in fire frequency (Brown and Archer 1987). It is believed that this group formerly occurred in relatively minor amounts and was largely confined to drainages until cattle distributed seed upland from the bosques into desert grasslands (Brown and Archer 1987, 1989). Shrublands dominated by Prosopis spp. have replaced large areas of desert grasslands, especially those formerly dominated by Bouteloua eriopoda, in Trans-Pecos Texas, southern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona (York and Dick-Peddie 1969, Hennessy et al. 1983). Studies on the Jornada Experimental Range suggest that combinations of drought, overgrazing by livestock, wind and water erosion, seed dispersal by livestock, fire suppression, shifting dunes, and changes in the seasonal distribution of precipitation have caused this recent, dramatic shift in vegetation physiognomy (Buffington and Herbel 1965, Herbel et al. 1972, Humphrey 1974, McLaughlin and Bowers 1982, Gibbens et al. 1983, Hennessy et al. 1983, Schlesinger et al. 1990, McPherson 1995).
For sandy site desert scrub it is important to differentiate between (1) coppice dunes / associated interdune and (2) sandsheets. Invasive mesquite dominates on coppice dunes, especially where the interdune contains an argillic horizon layer with increased clay content. Mesquite produces large taproots and long lateral roots which enable it to extract moisture from deeper depths and the associated interdune. On sandsheets, as noted by Steven Yanoff (pers. comm.), sandsage dominates. These soils are typically deeper and coarser-textured (sand and loamy sand). The coarse texture allows rapid infiltration and helps decrease wicking of soil moisture to the surface via capillary rise. Common associations on sandsheets dominated by Artemisia filifolia, Psorothamnus scoparius, and Rhus microphylla occurred historically and are not included in this group with invasive Prosopis glandulosa unless there is an herbaceous understory that is dominated by exotic species.
For sandy site desert scrub it is important to differentiate between (1) coppice dunes / associated interdune and (2) sandsheets. Invasive mesquite dominates on coppice dunes, especially where the interdune contains an argillic horizon layer with increased clay content. Mesquite produces large taproots and long lateral roots which enable it to extract moisture from deeper depths and the associated interdune. On sandsheets, as noted by Steven Yanoff (pers. comm.), sandsage dominates. These soils are typically deeper and coarser-textured (sand and loamy sand). The coarse texture allows rapid infiltration and helps decrease wicking of soil moisture to the surface via capillary rise. Common associations on sandsheets dominated by Artemisia filifolia, Psorothamnus scoparius, and Rhus microphylla occurred historically and are not included in this group with invasive Prosopis glandulosa unless there is an herbaceous understory that is dominated by exotic species.
Environmental Description: This ruderal desert scrub group is found in Arizona in areas that were formerly mixed desert grasslands, in northern Mexico, and possibly in New Mexico and Texas. Elevations range from 960-1100 m (3150-3600 feet). Climate is arid to semi-arid with hot summers. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 22-28 cm, but can vary greatly from year to year. Drought is not uncommon. Annual precipitation has bimodal distribution with the proportion of summer precipitation decreasing westward (Barbour and Major 1977). At Tucson, Arizona, about half of the annual rain falls during July to October with the balance during the winter months. The most arid season is late spring and early summer. The summer rain often occurs as high-intensity convective storms. Stands occur on alluvial fans, ridges, hills and valley floors. Sites occur on flats and basins to moderately steep slopes. Substrates are variable and range from well-drained sandy loam to finer-textured silt loam or clays.
Geographic Range: This ruderal desert scrub group occurs in Arizona and possibly New Mexico and Texas in areas that were formerly mixed desert grasslands. It likely occurs in northern Mexico and is presumably widespread in agricultural areas in this warm semi-arid region.
Nations: MX,US
States/Provinces: AZ, CA, CO, MXCHH?, MXCOA, MXSON, NM, NV, OK?, TX
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.953927
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNA
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 3 Desert & Semi-Desert Class | C03 | 3 |
Subclass | 3.A Warm Desert & Semi-Desert Woodland, Scrub & Grassland Subclass | S06 | 3.A |
Formation | 3.A.2 Warm Desert & Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Formation | F015 | 3.A.2 |
Division | 3.A.2.Na North American Warm Desert Scrub & Grassland Division | D039 | 3.A.2.Na |
Macrogroup | 3.A.2.Na.90 Honey Mesquite / Red Brome - Lehmann''s Lovegrass Desert Ruderal Scrub & Grassland Macrogroup | M512 | 3.A.2.Na.90 |
Group | 3.A.2.Na.90.b Honey Mesquite - Velvet Mesquite Warm Desert Ruderal Scrub Group | G819 | 3.A.2.Na.90.b |
Alliance | A3135 Honey Mesquite Ruderal Desert Sand Scrub Alliance | A3135 | 3.A.2.Na.90.b |
Alliance | A3162 Honey Mesquite Ruderal Desert Scrub Alliance | A3162 | 3.A.2.Na.90.b |
Alliance | A3163 Velvet Mesquite Ruderal Desert Scrub Alliance | A3163 | 3.A.2.Na.90.b |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Shrub - Scrub Disclimax Series - 143.16 (Brown et al. 1979)
- Barbour, M. G., and J. Major, editors. 1977. Terrestrial vegetation of California. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1002 pp.
- Brown, D. E., C. H. Lowe, and C. P. Pase. 1979. A digitized classification system for the biotic communities of North America with community (series) and association examples for the Southwest. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 14:1-16.
- Brown, J. R., and S. Archer. 1987. Woody plant seed dispersal and gap formation in a North American subtropical savanna woodland: The role of domestic herbivores. Vegetatio 73:73-80.
- Brown, J. R., and S. Archer. 1989. Woody plant invasion of grasslands: Establishment of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa) on sites differing in herbaceous biomass and grazing history. Oecologia 80:19-26.
- Buffington, L. C., and C. H. Herbel. 1965. Vegetational changes on a semidesert grassland range from 1858 to 1963. Ecological Monographs 35(2):139-164.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Gibbens, R. P., J. M. Tromble, J. T. Hennessy, and M. Cardenas. 1983. Soil movement in mesquite dunelands and former grasslands of southern New Mexico. Journal of Range Management 36(2):145-148.
- Hennessy, J. T., R. P. Gibbens, J. M. Tromble, and M. Cardenas. 1983. Vegetation changes from 1935 to 1980 in mesquite dunelands and former grasslands of southern New Mexico. Journal of Range Management 36(3):370-374.
- Herbel, C. H., F. N. Ares, and R. Wright. 1972. Drought effects on a semidesert grassland range. Ecology 53:1084-1093.
- Humphrey, R. R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of North America. Pages 365-400 in: T. T. Kozlowski and C. E. Ahlgren, editors. Fire and Ecosystems. Academic Press, New York.
- McLaughlin, S. P., and J. E. Bowers. 1982. Effects of wildfire on a Sonoran Desert plant community. Ecology 63(1):246-248.
- McPherson, G. R. 1995. The role of fire in the desert grasslands. Pages 130-151 in: M. P. McClaran and T. R. Van Devender, editors. The Desert Grassland. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
- Schlesinger, W. H., J. F. Reynolds, G. L. Cunningham, L. F. Huenneke, W. M. Jarrell, R. A. Virginia, and W. G. Whitford. 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043-1048.
- York, J. C., and W. A. Dick-Peddie. 1969. Vegetation changes in southern New Mexico during the past hundred years. Pages 157-166 in: W. O. McGinnies and B. J. Goldman, editors. Arid lands in perspective. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.