Print Report

CEGL006635 Quercus rubra - Acer saccharum / Viburnum acerifolium - Lindera benzoin Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern Red Oak - Sugar Maple / Mapleleaf Viburnum - Northern Spicebush Forest

Colloquial Name: Red Oak - Transitional Northern Hardwood Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: These mesic forests of oak and northern hardwoods, sometimes mixed with hemlock or pine, are distributed across the Allegheny Plateau, Lake Ontario and Lake Erie plains and Lower New England regions of the northeastern United States. They occur on slightly acidic, well-drained loamy and often rocky soils of intermediate fertility, most often positioned on midslopes and coves. Soil depth is often shallow, but some stands occur on deep tills. Most are at low to mid elevations, usually under 520 m (1700 feet), but they may range up to 765 m (2500 feet). The deciduous-to-mixed canopy is mostly closed, and the lower layers are variable in extent. Tall shrubs are well-represented, although scattered, with occasional denser patches. Herbs are sparse and bryoids are nearly absent. Ericads and other dwarf-shrubs are also nearly absent, a characteristic that distinguishes this association from most other red oak forests in the Northeast. Canopy composition is a variable mixture of Quercus rubra (usually at least 30% of the canopy), Fagus grandifolia, Acer saccharum, Acer rubrum, and in some stands Pinus strobus or Tsuga canadensis. Conifers generally make up less than 20% of the canopy cover, and even in mixed stands the cover of deciduous trees exceeds that of conifers. Minor canopy associates include Fraxinus americana, Tilia americana, Betula lenta, Juglans cinerea, and Ulmus americana. Acer pensylvanicum is common as a small tree; in the central and southern portions of the distribution, Cornus florida and Prunus serotina are common small trees as well. Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, and Hamamelis virginiana are typical shrubs, with Kalmia latifolia and Lindera benzoin occasional in all but the northern portions of the range. Typical species in the herb layer include Gaultheria procumbens, Maianthemum canadense, Aralia nudicaulis, Trientalis borealis, Uvularia sessilifolia, Medeola virginiana, Brachyelytrum erectum, Dryopteris intermedia, Polystichum acrostichoides, Dennstaedtia punctilobula, Pteridium aquilinum, and Thelypteris noveboracensis. On more nutrient-rich soils, the herb layer may contain Solidago caesia, Caulophyllum thalictroides, Dryopteris marginalis, and Eurybia divaricata. This association is distinguished from other transitional northern hardwood forests by its greater amount of oak, from other oak forests by its greater prominence of northern hardwoods and lack of dwarf-shrub ericads, and from hemlock-hardwoods by the relatively low importance of hemlock.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type was formerly included in CEGL006173. It was separated from ~Quercus rubra - Acer saccharum - Fagus grandifolia / Viburnum acerifolium Forest (CEGL006633)$$ to more clearly distinguish the Allegheny Plateau and Lower New England characteristics from the Northern Appalachian region stands.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The deciduous-to-mixed canopy is mostly closed, and the lower layers are variable in extent. Tall shrubs are well represented, although scattered, with occasional denser patches. Herbs are sparse, and bryoids are nearly absent. Ericads and other dwarf-shrubs are also nearly absent, a characteristic that distinguishes this association from most other red oak forests in the Northeast. Canopy composition is a variable mixture of Quercus rubra (usually at least 30% of the canopy), Fagus grandifolia, Acer saccharum, Acer rubrum, and, in some stands, Pinus strobus or Tsuga canadensis. In mixed stands, the cover of deciduous trees exceeds that of conifers. Minor canopy associates include Fraxinus americana, Tilia americana, Betula lenta, Juglans cinerea, and Ulmus americana. Acer pensylvanicum is common as a small tree; in the central and southern portions of the distribution, Cornus florida and Prunus serotina are common small trees as well. Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, and Hamamelis virginiana are typical shrubs, with Kalmia latifolia and Lindera benzoin occasional in all but the northern portions of the range. Typical species in the herb layer include Gaultheria procumbens, Maianthemum canadense, Aralia nudicaulis, Trientalis borealis, Uvularia sessilifolia, Medeola virginiana, Brachyelytrum erectum, Dryopteris intermedia, Polystichum acrostichoides, Dennstaedtia punctilobula, Pteridium aquilinum, and Thelypteris noveboracensis. On more nutrient-rich soils, the herb layer may contain Solidago caesia, Caulophyllum thalictroides, and Eurybia divaricata (= Aster divaricatus).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  These forests occur on slightly acidic, well-drained loamy and often rocky soils of intermediate fertility, most often positioned on midslopes and coves. Soil depth is often shallow, but some occur on deep tills. Stands often occur at low to mid elevations, usually under 520 m (1700 feet), but in the southern portion of their distribution they may range up to 760 m (2500 feet).

Geographic Range: This association occurs in the Allegheny Plateau, Lake Ontario and Lake Erie plains and Lower New England regions and south to New Jersey.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, NH, NJ, NY, ON, PA, RI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < CNE mesic hardwood forest on acidic bedrock/till (Rawinski 1984a)
< Northern Red Oak: 55 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-02-14

  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., A. L. Feldmann, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, F. C. Sechler, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014b. Vegetation inventory: Saratoga National Historical Park, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/869, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Gawler, S. C., R. E. Zaremba, and Cogan Technology, Inc. 2017. Vegetation mapping inventory project: Minute Man National Historical Park, Massachusetts. Natural Resource Report NPS/MIMA/NRR--2017/1450. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Metzler, K. J., and J. P. Barrett. 2001. Vegetation classification for Connecticut. Draft 5/21/2001. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources Center, Natural Diversity Database, Hartford.
  • NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2004a. Soil survey of Saratoga County, New York. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 590 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Sechler, F. C., G. J. Edinger, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014. Vegetation classification and mapping at Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National Historic Sites, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/873, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 392 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]