Print Report

CEGL006632 Acer saccharum - Fagus grandifolia - Fraxinus americana / Arisaema triphyllum Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sugar Maple - American Beech - White Ash / Jack-in-the-Pulpit Forest

Colloquial Name: Transitional Northern Hardwood Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association, known commonly as "northern hardwood forest," is a widespread matrix forest in the Allegheny Plateau of Pennsylvania and New York, the adjacent Lake Ontario and Lake Erie plains and in Lower New England to northern New Jersey. This forest occurs most commonly on moderately acidic (pH 5.5-7), moderate to well-drained tills at elevations generally below 762 m (2500 feet). Slope and rolling topographic settings are common. The closed-canopy forest has sparse to moderate shrub and herb cover and may have local carpets of tree seedlings in the ground vegetation. Bryoids are a minor component of the forest floor. The closed-canopy forest has sparse to moderate shrub and herb cover and may have local carpets of tree seedlings in the ground vegetation. Bryoids are a minor component of the forest floor. The canopy is dominated by Acer saccharum mixed with variable amounts of Fagus grandifolia and/or Fraxinus americana Associated hardwood species include Acer rubrum, Betula papyrifera, and Betula alleghaniensis, and Tilia americana. Betula lenta may be present. Conifers are usually present at low abundance. Characteristic species include Pinus strobus and Tsuga canadensis. Oaks are generally not present, although Quercus rubra and Quercus alba are sometimes present in low numbers. The shrub layer is often dominated by saplings of canopy tree species Characteristic understory shrubs or small trees include Acer pensylvanicum, Amelanchier laevis, Ostrya virginiana, Viburnum acerifolium and, occasionally, Lindera benzoin. The patchy herbaceous layer is a mix of ferns, rhizomatous herbs and clubmosses. Characteristic species include Dryopteris intermedia, Dryopteris carthusiana, Polystichum acrostichoides, Huperzia lucidula, Maianthemum canadense, Clintonia borealis, Trientalis borealis, Oclemena acuminata, and Uvularia sessilifolia. Occasional species include Aralia nudicaulis, Trillium erectum, Trillium grandiflorum, Dryopteris campyloptera, Streptopus lanceolatus, Cinna latifolia, Thelypteris noveboracensis, Mitchella repens, Solidago macrophylla, and Medeola virginiana. The bryophyte layer may include Dicranum spp. and Leucobryum glaucum. Sugar maple leaf litter is high in nitrogen relative to lignin and thus decomposes rapidly, increasing the nutrient pool in the soil organic layer. Structure and composition of the forest are maintained primarily by single small tree-fall gaps. Yellow birch is maintained in the system by mineral soils on "tip-up mounds."

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type was formerly included in CEGL006252. It is the Allegheny-Lower New England counterpart to ~Acer saccharum - Betula alleghaniensis - Fagus grandifolia / Viburnum lantanoides Forest (CEGL006631)$$, from which it was separated to reflect the transitional northern - central hardwoods character of the vegetation.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The closed-canopy forest has sparse to moderate shrub and herb cover and may have local carpets of tree seedlings in the ground vegetation. Bryoids are a minor component of the forest floor. On some rocky, higher-elevation sites, dense ferns and other herbs may form a lush understory (the "fern-glade variant"). The canopy is dominated by Acer saccharum mixed with variable amounts of Fagus grandifolia and/or Fraxinus americana. Associated hardwood species include Acer rubrum, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, and Tilia americana. Betula lenta may be present. Conifers are usually present at low abundance. Characteristic species include Pinus strobus and Tsuga canadensis. Oaks are generally not present, although Quercus rubra and Quercus alba are sometimes present in low numbers. The shrub layer is often dominated by saplings of canopy tree species. Characteristic understory shrubs or small trees include Acer pensylvanicum, Amelanchier laevis, Ostrya virginiana, Viburnum acerifolium and, occasionally, Lindera benzoin. The patchy herbaceous layer is a mix of ferns, rhizomatous herbs and clubmosses. Characteristic species include Dryopteris intermedia, Dryopteris carthusiana, Polystichum acrostichoides, Huperzia lucidula, Maianthemum canadense, Clintonia borealis, Trientalis borealis, Oclemena acuminata (= Aster acuminatus), and Uvularia sessilifolia. Occasional species include Aralia nudicaulis, Trillium erectum, Trillium grandiflorum, Dryopteris campyloptera, Streptopus lanceolatus var. lanceolatus (= Streptopus roseus), Cinna latifolia, Thelypteris noveboracensis, Mitchella repens, Solidago macrophylla, and Medeola virginiana. The bryophyte layer may include Dicranum spp. and Leucobryum glaucum. In the southern portion of the range, exotic species, including Berberis thunbergii and Microstegium vimineum, may be common in the shrub and herb layers.

Dynamics:  Sugar maple leaf litter is high in nitrogen relative to lignin and thus decomposes rapidly, increasing the nutrient pool in the soil organic layer. Structure and composition of the forest are maintained primarily by single small tree-fall gaps. Yellow birch is maintained in the system by mineral soils on "tip-up mounds."

Environmental Description:  This association, known commonly as "northern hardwood forest," is a widespread matrix forest in central New England. This forest occurs most commonly on acidic (pH 5-6), moderate to well-drained tills at elevations generally below 760 m (2500 feet).

Geographic Range: This association is a widespread matrix forest in the Allegheny Plateau of New York and Pennsylvania, on the Lake Ontario and Lake Erie plains and in Lower New England, with a more limited distribution to northern New Jersey.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CT?, MA, NJ, NY, ON, PA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This type was formerly included in CEGL006252. It is the Allegheny-Lower New England counterpart to ~Acer saccharum - Betula alleghaniensis - Fagus grandifolia / Viburnum lantanoides Forest (CEGL006631)$$, from which it was separated to reflect the transitional northern - central hardwoods character of the vegetation.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Beech - Sugar Maple: 60 (Eyre 1980)
? CNE dry transitional forest on sandy / gravelly soils (Rawinski 1984a)
< CNE mesic conifer [transition] forest on acidic bedrock/till (Rawinski 1984a)
< Northern Hardwood Forest (Bormann et al. 1970) [This association is at the lower to mid elevations, grading to CEGL006267 at the higher.]
= Northern Hardwoods without Hemlock (Niering 1953)
? Northern hardwood forest: boreal/montane type (NAP pers. comm. 1998)
< Sugar Maple - Beech - Yellow Birch: 25 (Eyre 1980)
< Sugar Maple: 27 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): Northern Appalachian Planning Team and L.A. Sneddon

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-12-15

  • Bormann, F. H., T. G. Siccama, G. E. Likens, and R. H. Whittaker. 1970. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem study: Composition and dynamics of the tree stratum. Ecological Monographs 40:373-388.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Flaccus, E. 1972. Vegetation natural areas of the hemlock - white pine - northern hardwood region of the eastern deciduous forest. USDI National Park Service. 541 pp.
  • Gordon, R. B. 1937b. A botanical survey of the southwestern section of the Allegheny State Park. New York State Museum Handbook 17:199-247. State University of New York, Albany.
  • Kern, M. J. 1985. T15R9 Aroostook County. A natural resources inventory. Bureau of Public Lands, Department of Conservation. State Planning Office, Augusta, Me. 169 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • Little, S. 1974. Effects of fire on temperate forests: Northeastern United States. Chapter 1 in: T. T. Kozlowski and C. E. Ahlgren, editors. Fire and Ecosystems. Academic Press, New York.
  • McIntosh, R. P. 1972. Forests of the Catskill Mountains, New York. Ecological Monographs 42:143-161.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • NAP [Northern Appalachian-Boreal Forest Working Group]. 1998. Northern Appalachian-Boreal Working group discussions. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.
  • Niering, W. A. 1953. The past and present vegetation of High Point State Park, New Jersey. Ecological Monographs 23:127-148.
  • Ohmann, L. F., and M. F. Buell. 1968. Forest vegetation of the New Jersey highlands. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 95:287-298.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, E. Eastman, L. A. Sneddon, and S. C. Gawler. 2007. Classification and mapping of vegetation and fire fuel models at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2007/076. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 2 volumes.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, M. Furedi, B. A. Eichelberger, A. Feldmann, G. Edinger, E. Eastman, and L. A. Sneddon. 2008. Vegetation classification and mapping at Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/133. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 370 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Simko, A. L. 1987. Coastal forests of southern New England. Wildflower Notes 2:21-26.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Woods, K. D. 1987. Northern hardwood forests in New England. Wildflower Notes 2:2-10.