Print Report

A3644 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii Dry-Mesic Scree & Talus Woodland Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This forest and woodland alliance of the northern, central and southern Rocky Mountains occurs on talus and scree slopes dominated by Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Dry-Mesic Scree & Talus Woodland Alliance

Colloquial Name: Scree & Talus Dry-Mesic Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This forest and woodland alliance of the northern, central and southern Rocky Mountains occurs on talus and scree slopes. Currently there is no floristic or environmental data available for ~Abies lasiocarpa Scree Woodland (CEGL000925)$$, and therefore the description of this alliance is based on the other two associations attributed here. Canopy cover is open to moderately closed and dominated by Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii. Canopy associates may include Pseudotsuga menziesii and occasionally Pinus strobiformis. Understories are distinctly shrubby. Dominant shrubs may include Acer glabrum, Holodiscus dumosus, Jamesia americana, Juniperus communis, and Symphoricarpos oreophilus. The herbaceous layer is poorly represented and may have sparse to moderate cover. The most common species is Leymus triticoides. This alliance is restricted to upper elevations above 3020 m and occurs on steep slopes with cobbly soils derived from talus and scree.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Moderately closed to nearly sparse needle-leaved evergreen forests and woodlands of the northern, central and southern Rocky Mountains occurring on scree and talus slopes dominated by Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance is provisional as two of the member associations occur in the far southern Rocky Mountains and one occurs in the north-central Rocky Mountains leaving a substantial geographic information gap. This alliance is based upon a series concept in which Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii may not be the dominant tree canopy species but is always present in the regeneration layer, and it is assumed would dominate the site should "climax" conditions be reached. These forests and woodlands have been poorly sampled and may prove with further data to be sparsely vegetated types that should be moved into the sparse vegetation class of the USNVC.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: These are forests dominated by needle-leaved evergreen trees up to 45 m in height and moderately closed to nearly sparse (20-100%). Although cold-deciduous trees are relatively rare, they can be prominent in some regional variants or seral stands. Stands may be so tightly stocked that little light reaches the forest floor and understory layers are depauperate. In stands with somewhat more open canopies, a moderately dense shrub layer may be present, dominated by ericaceous or cold-deciduous species. The herbaceous layer is dominated by perennial forbs or sod-forming graminoids, and herbaceous cover increases with increasing light availability and/or soil moisture. There is often significant cover of mosses and sometimes lichens on the forest floor and on downed woody material.

Floristics: Canopy cover is open to moderately closed and dominated by Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii. Canopy associates may include Pseudotsuga menziesii and occasionally Pinus strobiformis. Understories are distinctly shrubby. Dominant shrubs may include Acer glabrum, Holodiscus dumosus, Jamesia americana, Juniperus communis, and Symphoricarpos oreophilus. The herbaceous layer is poorly represented and may have sparse to moderate cover. The most common species is Leymus triticoides.

Dynamics:  Picea engelmannii is susceptible to infestations by the spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) or the spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis), which can cause high mortality during outbreaks.

Environmental Description:  This alliance is restricted to upper elevations above 3020 m and occurs on steep slopes with cobbly soils derived from talus and scree.

Geographic Range: Little is known about the full distribution of this alliance. Currently it is documented from the Arizona-New Mexico Mountains and the central and southern Rocky Mountains.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, MT, NM, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.164, A.559.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii Series (Johnston 1987)
>< Picea series (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir: 206 (Eyre 1980)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 15: Western Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 21: Southwestern Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)

Concept Author(s): E. Muldavin, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-14-14

  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.