Print Report
A3606 Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Picea sitchensis Forest Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This alliance consists of mixed conifer forests characterized by Chamaecyparis lawsoniana codominant in the tree canopy with other conifers, most often with Pseudotsuga menziesii. Additional codominants include Tsuga heterophylla in northern stands and Picea sitchensis in coastal stands. It occurs in a very restricted range in the Klamath-Siskiyou mountain region of northern California and southern Oregon, but shows wide ecological amplitude within that range. Winters are cool and wet; summers are warm and dry. Coastal stands are usually associated with penetration of ocean fog events, and are particularly well-developed on moist toeslopes and valley bottoms of coastal river drainages.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Port Orford-cedar - Sitka Spruce Forest Alliance
Colloquial Name: Port Orford-cedar - Sitka Spruce Forest
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This alliance consists of mixed conifer forests characterized by Chamaecyparis lawsoniana codominant in the tree canopy usually with Pseudotsuga menziesii. Additional codominants include Tsuga heterophylla in northern stands and Picea sitchensis in coastal stands. Other conifers present may include Abies lowiana, Callitropsis nootkatensis, Picea breweriana, and Taxus brevifolia. A tall-shrub stratum generally occurs with Acer circinatum, Gaultheria shallon, Rhododendron macrophyllum, and/or Vaccinium parvifolium. Shorter shrubs may include Chimaphila umbellata, Leucothoe davisiae, Mahonia nervosa, Paxistima myrsinites, Rosa gymnocarpa, Rubus ursinus, and Vaccinium membranaceum. Herbaceous layers commonly have shade-tolerant species such as Clintonia uniflora, Goodyera oblongifolia, Linnaea borealis, Oxalis oregana, and Polystichum munitum. Important herbs may include Xerophyllum tenax, in addition to the species listed above. This alliance occurs in a very restricted range in the Klamath-Siskiyou mountain region of northern California and southern Oregon, but shows wide ecological amplitude within that range.
Diagnostic Characteristics: Dominance or codominance of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana along alluvial terraces or narrow draws and drainages.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: In the southern portion of the range of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, it mixes with Sequoia sempervirens, Umbellularia californica, Notholithocarpus densiflorus, as well as Pseudotsuga menziesii, where it is part of ~Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Forest Alliance (A0104)$$ in ~Californian Coastal Redwood Forest Group (G235)$$.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: Evergreen, scale-leaved trees of moderate to high density and high (60-100%) cover. This canopy can be over 50 m in height in some stands. Cold-deciduous or sclerophyllous broad-leaved trees commonly form a subcanopy. On serpentine soils, these forests grade into woodlands with irregular canopy closure. The understory usually contains a layer of tall (2-5 m tall), ericaceous shrubs of moderate (25-60%) cover and a short-shrub layer (0.5-2 m tall) with 10-40% cover. The herbaceous understory is typically a dense layer of shade-tolerant ferns and forbs.
Floristics: Despite the small range of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, vegetation within this alliance is diverse. In the northern portion of its range, Chamaecyparis lawsoniana grows with Tsuga heterophylla, and in coastal stands with Picea sitchensis. Pseudotsuga menziesii is common, or codominant, in most stands. Other conifers that may be found include Abies lowiana (= Abies concolor var. lowiana), Abies magnifica, Callitropsis nootkatensis (= Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), Picea breweriana, and Taxus brevifolia. The northern stands lie north of the Rogue River, Oregon, and are the most extensive, continuous, and productive forests within this alliance. Understories are somewhat typical of the coastal forests of central Oregon, often with a broad-leaved tree subcanopy of Acer macrophyllum, Chrysolepis chrysophylla (= Castanopsis chrysophylla), Notholithocarpus densiflorus (= Lithocarpus densiflorus), or Alnus rubra, and a tall-shrub stratum of Acer circinatum, Rhododendron macrophyllum, Vaccinium parvifolium, or Gaultheria shallon. Shorter shrubs may include Chimaphila umbellata, Leucothoe davisiae, Mahonia nervosa, Paxistima myrsinites, Rosa gymnocarpa, Rubus ursinus, and Vaccinium membranaceum. Herbaceous layers commonly have shade-tolerant species such as Clintonia uniflora, Goodyera oblongifolia, Linnaea borealis, Oxalis oregana, and Polystichum munitum.
South of the Rogue River, stands become more scattered and extend into the interior to become important components of the mixed evergreen and montane forests of the Klamath-Siskiyou mountains. In the mixed evergreen forests, Arbutus menziesii, Calocedrus decurrens, Notholithocarpus densiflorus, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Umbellularia californica are common in the tree canopy. Important herbs may include Xerophyllum tenax, in addition to the species listed above.
South of the Rogue River, stands become more scattered and extend into the interior to become important components of the mixed evergreen and montane forests of the Klamath-Siskiyou mountains. In the mixed evergreen forests, Arbutus menziesii, Calocedrus decurrens, Notholithocarpus densiflorus, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Umbellularia californica are common in the tree canopy. Important herbs may include Xerophyllum tenax, in addition to the species listed above.
Dynamics: Chamaecyparis lawsoniana is a somewhat shade-tolerant conifer. It regenerates under its own shade and will eventually dominate stands where it co-occurs with Pinus spp., if disturbance is absent. Conversely, it appears to be less shade-tolerant and much more fire-tolerant than Tsuga heterophylla or Picea sitchensis, and can vigorously colonize recently burned substrates. Mature individuals of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana have thick, fire-resistant bark which allows them to persist through repeated fires. Phytophthora root rot, a water-borne disease spread by logging and other anthropogenic disturbances, is severely impacting stands of this alliance throughout its range. Many stands have been lost to this pathogen, and populations are presently in decline throughout the range of the species.
Environmental Description: Winters are cool and wet; summers are warm and dry. Coastal stands are usually associated with penetration of ocean fog events, and are particularly well-developed on moist toeslopes and valley bottoms of coastal river drainages. Disjunct inland stands occur at up to 2000 m elevation in the southern Cascades and inner Klamath Mountains where stands occur in moist microhabitats, often in association with streams or springs. Soils are often moist, coarse-textured, ultra-mafic soils with perched water tables derived from alluvium or colluvium.
Geographic Range: This alliance occurs in southwestern coastal Oregon and extreme northwestern California Coastal Ranges and Klamath-Siskiyou mountains.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: CA, OR
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899664
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Nd Vancouverian Forest & Woodland Division | D192 | 1.B.2.Nd |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Nd.3 Western Hemlock - Sitka Spruce - Redwood Rainforest Macrogroup | M024 | 1.B.2.Nd.3 |
Group | 1.B.2.Nd.3.f Western Hemlock - Sitka Spruce North-Central Pacific Rainforest Group | G751 | 1.B.2.Nd.3.f |
Alliance | A3606 Port Orford-cedar - Sitka Spruce Forest Alliance | A3606 | 1.B.2.Nd.3.f |
Association | CEGL000042 Sierra White Fir - Port Orford-cedar / Deer Oak / Sierra Laurel - Pacific Rhododendron Forest | CEGL000042 | 1.B.2.Nd.3.f |
Association | CEGL000054 Port Orford-cedar - Sitka Spruce / California Huckleberry - Pacific Rhododendron Forest | CEGL000054 | 1.B.2.Nd.3.f |
Concept Lineage: A.104 (with edits)
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: < Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Port Orford cedar forest) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [81.100.00]
>< Port Orford-Cedar: 231 (Eyre 1980)
>< Port Orford-Cedar: 231 (Eyre 1980)
- Atzet, T. A., D. E. White, L. A. McCrimmon, P. A. Martinez, P. R. Fong, and V. D. Randall. 1996. Field guide to the forested plant associations of southwestern Oregon. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-17-96. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
- Atzet, T., and D. L. Wheeler. 1984. Preliminary plant associations of the Siskiyou Mountains Province, Siskiyou National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
- Barrows, J. S., E. W. Mogren, K. Rowdabaugh, and R. Yancik. 1977. The role of fire in ponderosa pine and mixed conifer ecosystems. Final report, Cooperative report between the National Park Service and Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 101 pp.
- Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
- Chappell, C., R. Crawford, J. Kagan, and P. J. Doran. 1997. A vegetation, land use, and habitat classification system for the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of Oregon and Washington. Unpublished report prepared for Wildlife habitat and species associations within Oregon and Washington landscapes: Building a common understanding for management. Prepared by Washington and Oregon Natural Heritage Programs, Olympia, WA, and Portland, OR. 177 pp.
- Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. General Technical Report PNW-8. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. 417 pp.
- Frenkel, R. E., and C. W. Kiilsgaard. 1984. Vegetation classification and map of the central Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon. Unpublished report prepared for NASA-Ames University Consortium Joint Research Interchange by Department of Geography, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 101 pp.
- Hawk, G. M. 1977. A comparative study of temperate Chamaecyparis forests. Unpublished dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 194 pp.
- ORNHP [Oregon Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data files. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, The Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR.
- Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
- Wiedemann, A. M. 1966. Contributions to the plant ecology of the Oregon coastal sand dunes. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 255 pp.