Print Report

A3465 Pinus ponderosa Mesic Black Hills Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This mesic to wet Black Hills forest and woodland alliance has a tree canopy dominated by Pinus ponderosa but may include a sparse to relatively dense subcanopy of Juniperus scopulorum and presence to codominance of deciduous trees with an understory composed of relatively mesic shrub species and mesic to wet herbaceous indicator species. Stands occur at foothill and montane elevations on cooler northerly aspects and gentle to moderate benches and lower slopes and especially in mesic draws and swales and ravine and canyon bottoms.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Ponderosa Pine Mesic Black Hills Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Black Hills Ponderosa Pine Mesic Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This forest and woodland alliance occurs on mesic-wet sites at montane and foothill elevations in the Black Hills and isolated mountains such as Bear''s Paw Mountains in the northwestern Great Plains. Stands are primarily dominated by Pinus ponderosa but may include a sparse to relatively dense subcanopy of Juniperus scopulorum. Deciduous trees such as Acer negundo, Betula papyrifera, Crataegus succulenta, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Quercus macrocarpa, Populus tremuloides, and Ulmus americana are an important component in some areas, especially mesic draws and swales, and are sometimes codominant with the pines. The shrub layer is moderately dense to dense with characteristic species that include Amelanchier alnifolia, Physocarpus monogynus, Prunus virginiana, Symphoricarpos occidentalis, and Toxicodendron rydbergii. The herbaceous layer ranges from moderately dense to dense with moderate species diversity. Species such as Antennaria rosea, Apocynum androsaemifolium, Carex inops ssp. heliophila, Cerastium arvense, Elymus caninus, Galium boreale, Maianthemum stellatum, Pulsatilla patens, and Schizachne purpurascens are typical components of the herbaceous layer. Mosses and lichens are usually present. These mesic forests and woodlands are found on gentle to moderate (2-40%), cool north-facing slopes and frequently occur close to streams. A few stands are on rolling uplands. The soils are variable but are often sandy loams or loams derived from limestone and sandstone.

Diagnostic Characteristics: This alliance is characterized by the dominance of Pinus ponderosa in the tree canopy with an understory characterized by species common on mesic-wet sites such as the short shrubs Amelanchier alnifolia, Physocarpus monogynus, Prunus virginiana, Symphoricarpos occidentalis, and herbaceous species such as Apocynum androsaemifolium, Cerastium arvense, Elymus caninus, Galium boreale, and Maianthemum stellatum.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Broadly defined component associations that range into southern or central Rocky Mountains need further review.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The vegetation structure of stands in this alliance vary from open woodlands to closed-canopy forests composed of needle-leaved evergreen trees typically less than 30 m in height. Associated trees are primarily needle-leaved evergreen species, but cold-deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen trees may be present in the subcanopy. The understory is dry, often shrubby, with either tall or short layers, and sclerophyllous or cold-deciduous species dominant. Where there is no shrub layer, grassy understories are common, but perennial forbs are important in some stands.

Floristics: This mesic forest and woodland alliance is primarily dominated by Pinus ponderosa but may include a sparse to relatively dense subcanopy of Juniperus scopulorum (Hansen and Hoffman 1988). Deciduous trees such as Acer negundo, Betula papyrifera, Crataegus succulenta, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Populus tremuloides, Quercus macrocarpa, and Ulmus americana are an important component in some areas, especially mesic draws and swales, and are sometimes codominant with the pines (Hansen and Hoffman 1988). The shrub layer is moderately dense to dense with characteristic species that include Amelanchier alnifolia, Physocarpus monogynus, Prunus virginiana, Ribes missouriense, Rosa woodsii, Spiraea betulifolia, Symphoricarpos occidentalis, and Toxicodendron rydbergii. The herbaceous understory can range from moderately dense to dense. The diversity of species is moderate. Species such as Antennaria rosea, Apocynum androsaemifolium, Carex inops ssp. heliophila, Cerastium arvense, Elymus caninus, Galium boreale, Maianthemum stellatum, Pulsatilla patens, and Schizachne purpurascens are typical components of the herbaceous layer. Mosses and lichens are typically found in this community.

Dynamics:  Presettlement stands in the warm, moist Pinus ponderosa habitat types were often open and park-like. Surface fires kept stands in open condition by thinning out seedling and sapling trees. However, many modern stands have become overstocked as a result of fire suppression. These overstocked stands are more prone to stand-replacing crown fires (Fischer and Clayton 1983). Apparently Populus tremuloides may occasionally be a seral species (Roberts 1980). Populus tremuloides is often a component of stands in this alliance. Populus tremuloides abundance often increases in response to disturbance and clones will vigorously resprout (Knight 1994). The stems are relatively short-lived (100-150 years), and the stand will succeed to longer-lived conifer forest if undisturbed. With adequate disturbance a clone may live many centuries. Although Populus tremuloides produces abundant seeds, seedling survival is rare because of the long moist conditions required to establish are rare in the habitats that it occurs in. Superficial soil drying will kill seedlings (Knight 1994). In the Dakotas and Wyoming, these stands may remain successionally stable for many dozens of years (Girard et al. 1989).

Environmental Description:  This forest and woodland alliance occurs on mesic-wet sites at montane and foothill elevations in the Black Hills and isolated mountains such as Bear''s Paw Mountains in the northwestern Great Plains. Climate is temperate continental with mean annual precipitation of 35-40 cm (Soil Conservation Service 1981b). Elevation in Bear''s Paw Mountains is 1040-1600 m (Roberts 1980). Stands are found on gentle to moderate (2-40%), cool north-facing slopes and frequently occur close to streams (Hansen and Hoffman 1988). A few stands are on rolling uplands. The soils are variable but are often sandy loams or loams derived from limestone and sandstone. Soil reaction is near-neutral, and average duff depth is 6.4 cm (Roberts 1980).

Geographic Range: This forest and woodland alliance occurs on mesic-wet sites at montane and foothill elevations in the Black Hills and isolated mountains such as Bear''s Paw Mountains in the northwestern Great Plains.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  MT, ND, NE, SD, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This alliance includes four associations from Old Alliance I.A.8.N.b. Pinus ponderosa Forest Alliance (A.124), one association from Old Alliance I.B.2.N.b. Populus tremuloides Forest Alliance (A.274), and (A.530), and one association from Old Alliance II.A.4.N.a. Pinus ponderosa Woodland Alliance. A.124 (in part), A.274 (in part) and A.530 (in part).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Pinus ponderosa / Amelanchier alnifolia Habitat Type (Roberts 1980)
? Pinus ponderosa / Physocarpus monogynus Habitat Type (Hoffman and Alexander 1976)
? Pinus ponderosa / Prunus virginiana Habitat Type (Hoffman and Alexander 1987)
? Pinus ponderosa / Symphoricarpos occidentalis Habitat Type (Roberts 1980)
? Populus tremuloides / Padus virginiana Plant Association (Johnston 1987)

Concept Author(s): K.A. Schulz, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: We have incorporated significant descriptive information previously compiled by Marion Reid and Hollis Marriott.

Version Date: 01-08-14

  • Alexander, R. M. 1986. Classification of the forest vegetation of Wyoming. Research Note RM-466. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 10 pp.
  • Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. General Technical Report RM-123. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp.
  • Brown, R. W. 1971. Distribution of plant communities in southeastern Montana badlands. The American Midland Naturalist 85(2):458-477.
  • Cooper, S. V., and B. L. Heidel. 1997. Population status and ecology of trembling aspen and black cottonwood communities on the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. Prepared for the Blackfeet Nation-Fish and Wildlife Department and the USDI Fish & Wildlife Service by Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.
  • Cooper, S. V., and R. D. Pfister. 1985. Forest habitat types of the Crow and Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservations. Unpublished termination report prepared for Bureau of Indian Affairs, Billings Area Office by USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 118 pp.
  • Cooper, S., and R. Pfister. 1981. Forest habitat types of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. Review Draft, 5/21/81, for Bureau of Indian Affairs, Wind River Agency, Fort Washakie, WY.
  • Currie, P. O. 1975. Grazing management of ponderosa pine - bunchgrass ranges of the central Rocky Mountains: The status of our knowledge. Research Paper RM-159. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 24 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and Midwest State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. 1996. Terrestrial vegetation of the midwest United States. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Fischer, W. C., and B. D. Clayton. 1983. Fire ecology of Montana forest habitat types east of the Continental Divide. General Technical Report INT-141. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 83 pp.
  • Girard, M. M., H. Goetz, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1989. Native woodland habitat types of southwestern North Dakota. Research Paper RM-281. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P. L., and G. R. Hoffman. 1988. The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-157. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 68 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1976. Forest vegetation of the Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-170. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 38 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1987. Forest vegetation of the Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota and Wyoming: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-276. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Knight, D. H. 1994. Mountains and plains: Ecology of Wyoming landscapes. Yale University Press, New Haven, MA. 338 pp.
  • Lynn, R., M. Larson, D. Hoeft, L. Todd, T. Raetz, L. Fager, and G. Barranco. No date. Black Hills National Forest ecological land units study. USDA Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest, SD.
  • MacCracken, J. G., D. W. Uresk, and R. M. Hansen. 1983b. Plant community variability on a small area in southeastern Montana. Great Basin Naturalist 43(4):660-668.
  • MacCracken, J. G., L. E. Alexander, and D. W. Uresk. 1983a. An important lichen of southeastern Montana rangelands. Journal of Range Management 36(1):35-37.
  • Merkle, J. 1962. Plant communities of the Grand Canyon area, Arizona. Ecology 43(4):698-711.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Potter, L. D., and D. L. Green. 1964. Ecology of ponderosa pine in western North Dakota. Ecology 45(1):10-23.
  • Potter, L. D., and D. R. Moir. 1961. Phytosociological study of burned and unburned deciduous woods, Turtle Mountains, North Dakota. Ecology 42:468-480.
  • Progulske, D. R., and F. J. Shideler. 1974. Following Custer. South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin No. 674. Brookings. 139 pp.
  • Roberts, D. W. 1980. Forest habitat types of the Bear''s Paw Mountains and Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. Unpublished thesis, Department of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 116 pp.
  • Severson, K. E., and J. F. Thilenius. 1976. Classification of quaking aspen stands in the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains. Research Paper RM-166. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 24 pp.
  • Soil Conservation Service. 1981b. Average annual precipitation Montana. USDA-SCS, Bozeman, MT.
  • Thilenius, J. F. 1972. Classification of the deer habitat in the ponderosa pine forest of the Black Hills, South Dakota. Research Paper RM-91. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 28 pp.
  • Tiedemann, A. R., and G. O. Klock. 1977. Meeks Table Research Natural Area reference sampling and habitat classification. Research Report PNW-223. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland. 19 pp.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.