Print Report
A3427 Juniperus osteosperma - Juniperus scopulorum / Grass Understory Central Rocky Mountain Woodland Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This foothill and outcrop alliance primarily occurs along the eastern slope of the central Rocky Mountains and adjacent Great Plains, but extends from Colorado to Alberta. Stands have an open canopy dominated by Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma with understory characterized by a moderately dense to low perennial grass layer. If shrubs are present, then cover is low (<10%) and perennial grass cover exceeds shrub cover.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Rocky Mountain Juniper - Utah Juniper / Grass Understory Central Rocky Mountain Woodland Alliance
Colloquial Name: Central Rocky Mountain Juniper / Grass Woodland
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This woodland alliance occurs in foothill and lower montane zones in the Rocky Mountains from southern Alberta and northern Montana south to central Colorado and on escarpments across Wyoming extending out into the western Great Plains. The vegetation is characterized by an open-tree canopy or patchy woodland that is dominated by either Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma with a grassy understory. Pinus flexilis is absent or has low cover. The herbaceous layer ranges from low to moderately dense, and is typically dominated by perennial graminoids such as Bouteloua gracilis, Hesperostipa comata, Koeleria macrantha, Piptatheropsis micrantha, Poa secunda, or Pseudoroegneria spicata. If shrubs are present, then cover is low (<10%) and perennial grass cover exceeds shrub cover. These are rock outcrop, escarpment and patchy woodlands, occurring generally below continuous forests of Pseudotsuga menziesii or Pinus ponderosa. Elevation ranges from 1000-2400 m. Climatologically, the region is semi-arid and has a continental regime of hot summers and cold winters. Precipitation patterns are variable, but snow is common in winter, and spring rains are an important contributor. At higher elevations, it is limited to the most xeric aspects on rock outcrops, and at lower elevations to the relatively mesic north aspects. Slopes range from gentle to steep. Soils are typically thin, stony, clay or clay loam, commonly with exposed bedrock. The soil parent material varies with community association, but may be limestone, gneiss, sandstone, scoria, or shale. Stands are best developed on calcareous soils.
Diagnostic Characteristics: The alliance includes stand of patchy woodlands found on rock outcrops and escarpments at foothill elevations along the eastern Rocky Mountains Front Range out into the western Great Plains. Dominant and characteristic species are Juniperus scopulorum and Juniperus osteosperma. Perennial grass characterizes the understory with moderate to dense cover. Scattered shrubs may be present at lower cover than herbaceous layer. Diagnostic herbaceous species in the understory include Pseudoroegneria spicata and other species more typical of the Great Plains such as Bouteloua gracilis, Koeleria macrantha, or Schizachyrium scoparium. Shrubs are absent or have low cover (<10%) and perennial grass cover exceeds shrub cover.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Juniperus scopulorum is a wide-ranging species in the Rocky Mountains and may dominate stands in other groups. Juniperus osteosperma-dominated stands from the Pryor, Big Horn, and Laramie mountain ranges are included in this alliance because these stands are significantly disjunct from the main distribution of Juniperus osteosperma in the Colorado Plateau and Great Basin regions and may have floristic similarities to the Great Plains. At their upper elevational limit, Juniperus scopulorum communities may merge with woodlands and forests dominated by Pinus species. The dominance of Juniperus scopulorum and low cover of other tree species in the tree layer are diagnostic features that can usually be used to separate communities within this alliance from other wooded communities with grassy understories. At the lower elevation edges of this alliance it may be difficult to distinguish where open stands of this alliance transition to grassland with scattered trees (<10% cover).
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: Vegetation included in this alliance has an open to moderately dense tree canopy that is typically 2-5 m tall. Stands are solely dominated by evergreen scale-leaved trees. Scattered evergreen needle-leaved or deciduous broad-leaved trees may be present, but they never codominate. An open to moderately dense herbaceous layer dominated by perennial graminoids is present. Perennial forbs may be scattered. Annual forbs and grasses may be seasonally present.
Floristics: This alliance occurs in foothill and lower montane zones in the Rocky Mountains and extends out into the western Great Plains on escarpments. The vegetation is characterized by a patchy or open to moderately dense tree canopy 2-8 m tall that is dominated by either Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma. Scattered individuals of Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii may be present in the tree canopy, but have low cover (<5%) and are never codominant. In the plains stands the deciduous broad-leaved tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica may be present. Herbaceous layers range from low to moderately dense, and are typically dominated by perennial graminoids such as Bouteloua gracilis, Hesperostipa comata, Koeleria macrantha, Piptatheropsis micrantha (= Piptatherum micranthum), Poa secunda, or Pseudoroegneria spicata. Other graminoids include Achnatherum hymenoides (= Oryzopsis hymenoides), Carex rossii, Festuca idahoensis, Leucopoa kingii (= Festuca kingii), Leymus ambiguus, and Muhlenbergia montana. Perennial forbs are sparse but may be fairly diverse. The most common forbs are Achillea millefolium, Artemisia ludoviciana, Campanula rotundifolia, Eriogonum umbellatum, Galium boreale, Helianthus pumilus, Heterotheca villosa, Heuchera bracteata, Maianthemum stellatum, Penstemon virens, Potentilla fissa, and Senecio integerrimus. The cactus Opuntia polyacantha is often present. In some stands mosses and lichens provide significant ground cover. Annual grasses and forbs are seasonally present. If shrubs are present, then cover is low (<10%) and perennial grass cover exceeds shrub cover.
Dynamics: Woodlands in this alliance are considered to be edaphic or topographic climax communities (Hansen et al. 1984, Tiedemann et al. 1987). Juniperus scopulorum is a long-lived species. Hansen and Hoffman (1988) found most trees in stands they sampled to be over 120 years, with some individuals older than 360 years. Fire can be used to control Juniperus scopulorum stands on rangeland because the species will not resprout after being burned (Wright et al. 1979, Fischer and Bradley 1987). Young individuals are most vulnerable to fire (Wright et al. 1979, Fischer and Bradley 1987). The effect of fire on a stand is largely dependent on the tree height and density, fine fuel load on the ground, weather conditions, and season (Wright et al. 1979). Trees are more vulnerable in open stands where fires frequently occur in the spring, the humidity is low, wind speeds are over 10-20 mph, and there are adequate fine fuels to carry fire (Wright et al. 1979, Fischer and Bradley 1987). Under other conditions, burns tend to be spotty with low tree mortality. Large trees are generally not killed unless fine fuels, such as tumbleweeds, have accumulated beneath the tree to provide fuel ladders for the fire to reach the crown. Closed-canopy stands rarely burn because they typically do not have enough understory or wind to carry a fire. Altered fire regimes, cutting trees for fencing, and improper grazing by livestock have significant impacts on the quality of sites. Grazing by livestock can modify the fire regime by removing the fine fuels that carry fire. Fire, livestock grazing, and trampling by hikers and vehicles disturb cryptogamic soil crusts that help maintain soil structure, reduce soil erosion, provide habitat for plants and preserve biological diversity. More study is needed to understand and manage these woodlands.
Environmental Description: This foothill and outcrop alliance occurs in foothill and lower montane zones in the Rocky Mountains from southern Alberta and northern Montana south to central Colorado and on escarpments across Wyoming extending out into the western Great Plains. These are rock outcrop, escarpment and patchy woodlands, generally below continuous montane forests of Pseudotsuga menziesii or Pinus ponderosa. Elevation ranges from 1000-2400 m. Climatologically, the region is semi-arid and has a continental regime of hot summers and cold winters. Precipitation patterns are variable, but snow is common in winter, and spring rains are an important contributor. Annual precipitation is 40-60 cm. These woodlands are restricted to shallow soils and fractured bedrock derived from a variety of parent material, including limestone, sandstone, dolomite, granite, lava, shale and colluvium. Soils have a high rock component (typically over 50% cover) and are coarse- to fine-textured, often gravelly and are best developed calcareous soils. Slopes are typically moderately steep to steep. At higher elevations, it is limited to the most xeric aspects on rock outcrops, and at lower elevations to the relatively mesic north aspects.
Geographic Range: This alliance occurs in foothill and lower montane zones in the Rocky Mountains from southern Alberta and northern Montana south to central Colorado and on escarpments across Wyoming extending out into the western Great Plains and the Black Hills. This alliance generally occurs outside of the range of Pinus edulis, which is not present.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: AB, CO, ID, MT, NE, SD, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899550
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: Two associations from Old Alliance II.A.4.N.a. Juniperus scopulorum Woodland Alliance (A.506) are included in this alliance. Currently undescribed associations from Old Alliance II.A.4.N.a. Juniperus osteosperma Woodland Alliance (A.536) may occur. A.506 (in part)
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: > Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Community (Jones 1992b)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Hansen and Hoffman 1988)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Francis 1983)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Tiedemann et al. 1987)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (DeVelice et al. 1995)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (DeVelice et al. 1999)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
< Juniperus scopulorum Series (Johnston 1987)
< Juniperus scopulorum Series (Hess 1981)
> Juniperus scopulorum Vegetation Type (Thilenius et al. 1995)
< Rocky Mountain Juniper: 220 (Eyre 1980)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Hansen and Hoffman 1988)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Francis 1983)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type (Tiedemann et al. 1987)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (DeVelice et al. 1995)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (DeVelice et al. 1999)
> Juniperus scopulorum / Agropyron spicatum Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
< Juniperus scopulorum Series (Johnston 1987)
< Juniperus scopulorum Series (Hess 1981)
> Juniperus scopulorum Vegetation Type (Thilenius et al. 1995)
< Rocky Mountain Juniper: 220 (Eyre 1980)
- Badaracco, R. J. 1971. An interpretive resource analysis of Pawnee Buttes, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 341 pp.
- Bighorn Coal Mine. No date. Application No. 213-T2, on file at Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Land Quality Division, Cheyenne.
- Brown, R. W. 1971. Distribution of plant communities in southeastern Montana badlands. The American Midland Naturalist 85(2):458-477.
- Cooper, S. V., P. Lesica, R. L. DeVelice, and T. McGarvey. 1995. Classification of southwestern Montana plant communities with emphasis on those of Dillon Resource Area, Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 154 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L. 1992. Classification of the plant communities of Beaverhead, Silver Bow, and Madison counties, Montana. Volume I (text). Prepared for the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L., C. J. Hubbard, K. Boggs, S. Boudreau, M. Potkin, T. Boucher, and C. Wertheim. 1999. Plant community types of the Chugach National Forest: South-central Alaska. Technical Publication R10-TP-76. USDA Forest Service, Chugach National Forest, Alaska Region. 375 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L., S. V. Cooper, J. T. McGarvey, J. Lichthardt, and P. S. Bourgeron. 1995. Plant communities of northeastern Montana: A first approximation. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 116 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L., and P. Lesica. 1993. Plant community classification for vegetation on BLM lands, Pryor Mountains, Carbon County, Montana. Unpublished report by Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 78 pp.
- Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Fischer, W. C., and A. F. Bradley. 1987. Fire ecology of western Montana forest habitat types. General Technical Report INT-223. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 95 pp.
- Francis, R. E. 1983. Sagebrush-steppe habitat types in northern Colorado: A first approximation. Pages 67-71 in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Southwestern habitat types. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
- Hansen, P. L. 1985. An ecological study of the vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest. Unpublished dissertation, South Dakota State University. 257 pp.
- Hansen, P. L., G. R. Hoffman, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1984. The vegetation of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-113. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
- Hansen, P. L., and G. R. Hoffman. 1988. The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-157. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 68 pp.
- Hess, K. 1981. Phyto-edaphic study of habitat types of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 558 pp.
- Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
- Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
- Jones, G. 1992b. Wyoming plant community classification (Draft). Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 183 pp.
- Lesica, P., and R. L. DeVelice. 1992. Plant communities of the Pryor Mountains. Preliminary report prepared by the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.
- Moran, P. 1981a. Patterns of plant life at Pawnee National Grassland: A manual for the interpreter. Unpublished report prepared for the Pawnee National Grasslands, Greeley, CO. 88 pp.
- Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
- Terwilliger, C., K. Hess, and C. Wasser. 1979a. Key to the preliminary habitat types of Region 2. Addendum to initial progress report for habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO.
- Thilenius, J. F., G. R. Brown, and A. L. Medina. 1995. Vegetation on semi-arid rangelands, Cheyenne River Basin, Wyoming. General Technical Report RM-GTR-263. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 60 pp.
- Tiedemann, J. A., R. E. Francis, C. Terwilliger, Jr., and L. H. Carpenter. 1987. Shrub-steppe habitat types of Middle Park, Colorado. Research Paper RM-273. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 20 pp.
- Wasser, C. H., and K. Hess. 1982. The habitat types of Region II. USDA Forest Service: A synthesis. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 140 pp.
- Wells, P. V. 1965. Scarp woodlands, transported soils, and concept of grassland climate in the Great Plains region. Science 148:246-249.
- Wells, P. V. 1970a. Postglacial vegetational history of the Great Plains. Science 167:1574-1582.
- Wells, P. V. 1970b. Historical factors controlling vegetation patterns and floristic distributions in the central plains region of North America. Pages 211-221 in: W. Dort and J. D. Jones, editors. Pleistocene and recent environments of the central Great Plains. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.
- Wright, H. A., L. F. Neuenschwander, and C. M. Britton. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state of the art review. General Technical Report INT-58. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.