Print Report
A3424 Pinus flexilis / Shrub Understory Central Rocky Mountain Woodland Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This foothill and outcrop woodland alliance occurs along the eastern slope of the central Rocky Mountains and adjacent Great Plains. It is dominated by Pinus flexilis and may be codominated by Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma with an understory characterized by an open to moderately dense shrub layer. Herbaceous cover is typically low with less than cover than the shrubs.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Limber Pine / Shrub Understory Central Rocky Mountain Woodland Alliance
Colloquial Name: Central Rocky Mountain Limber Pine / Shrub Woodland
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This foothill and outcrop woodland alliance occurs along the eastern slope of the central and northern Rocky Mountains and on escarpments in the northwestern Great Plains. Stands have an open canopy dominated by Pinus flexilis and may be codominated by Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma. The understory typically has an open to moderately dense shrub layer (10-40% cover). Shrubs such as Amelanchier utahensis, Artemisia tridentata, Cercocarpus montanus, Purshia tridentata, and Rhus trilobata are common. Total shrub cover is typically >10%, but if less, then shrub cover exceeds herbaceous layer. The herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense and is composed primarily of graminoids such as Achnatherum hymenoides, Bouteloua gracilis, Festuca campestris, Leucopoa kingii, Koeleria macrantha, and Pseudoroegneria spicata. Scattered forbs may be present. Stands occur intermittently from lower montane and foothill zones in the central and northern Rocky Mountains, and on geographic breaks in the northwestern Great Plains. Elevations range from 850-2400 m. Sites are typically xeric on exposed, windswept rocky slopes and ridges. Some stands are on eroded substrates and resemble "badlands" while others may occur on lavaflows. These open woodlands occur on all aspects, but are most common on dry south- and west-facing slopes. Soils are typically shallow, skeletal and coarse-textured, such as gravelly, sandy loams or loams, but may include alkaline clays. Exposed bedrock is common and many stands have over 50% bare soil.
Diagnostic Characteristics: The alliance includes stands of patchy woodlands found on rock outcrops and escarpments at foothill elevations along the eastern Rocky Mountains Front Range out into the western Great Plains. Dominant and characteristic species are Pinus flexilis, Juniperus osteosperma, or Juniperus scopulorum. Shrubs characterize the understory with low to moderately dense cover. This alliance includes stands with a sparse understory of scattered shrubs. Herbaceous cover is sparse to moderately dense, but has less cover than shrubs. Diagnostic species include widespread Interior West species such as Artemisia tridentata, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Cercocarpus montanus, Ericameria nauseosa, or Purshia tridentata.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Pinus flexilis is a widespread species and may also be dominant in bristlecone pine-dominated groups such as ~Rocky Mountain Subalpine-Montane Limber Pine - Bristlecone Pine Woodland Group (G221)$$ and ~Intermountain Basins Subalpine Limber Pine - Bristlecone Pine Woodland Group (G224)$$, and is present in many mixed montane forest and woodland groups.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: Vegetation included in this alliance has an open tree canopy that is typically to 3-10 m tall. The canopy is dominated by evergreen needle-leaved trees. A sparse to moderately dense short-shrub and/or dwarf-shrub layer is present. If present, both shrub layers may be dominated by broad-leaved or microphyllous deciduous shrubs. A sparse to moderately dense herbaceous layer dominated by perennial graminoids is often present. Perennial forbs have low cover. Annual forbs and grasses may be seasonally present.
Floristics: Stands have an open canopy dominated by Pinus flexilis typically 3-10 m tall and may be codominated by Juniperus scopulorum or, less commonly, Juniperus osteosperma. The understory typically has an open to moderately dense shrub layer (10-40% cover). Shrubs such as Amelanchier utahensis, Artemisia tridentata, Cercocarpus montanus, Purshia tridentata, and Rhus trilobata are common. Total shrub cover is typically >10%, but if less, then shrub cover exceeds herbaceous layer cover. The herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense and is composed primarily of graminoids such as Achnatherum hymenoides (= Oryzopsis hymenoides), Bouteloua gracilis, Festuca campestris, Leucopoa kingii (= Festuca kingii), Koeleria macrantha, and Pseudoroegneria spicata. Scattered forbs may include species of Achillea, Antennaria, Arenaria, Arnica, Astragalus, Erigeron, Eriogonum, Hymenopappus, Hymenoxys, Liatris, Sedum, Solidago, and Thermopsis. In six plots in the Little Missouri National Grassland in western North Dakota, the average cover for each of the strata was trees 38%, shrubs 21%, graminoids 20%, and forbs 9% (USFS 1992).
Dynamics: Although some of the conifers that are typically codominant in Pinus flexilis stands are late-successional species, they are not likely to displace Pinus flexilis. This is because most of these stands occur on harsh sites where Pinus flexilis is more competitive than most other conifer species. These stands are generally considered to be topographic or edaphic "climax" stands (Cooper 1975, Eyre 1980). Even in stands at lower elevations, such as prairie breaks, it is unlikely that other coniferous species will become dominant (Eyre 1980). Because Pinus flexilis occurs over a broad range of elevations, it can also be important as a post-fire seral species on drier sites in the Rocky Mountains (Cooper 1975, Peet 1988). Peet (1978a) reported apparent competitive displacement with Pinus flexilis in Colorado. He noted that Pinus flexilis may dominate xeric sites from low to high elevations, except where Pinus aristata or Pinus albicaulis occur. There, Pinus flexilis is largely restricted to lower elevation, rocky sites. Peet (1978a) also reported that Pinus flexilis occurs in the less xeric Pinus contorta and Pinus ponderosa habitats.
Birds and small mammals often eat and cache the large, wingless pine seeds. Most important is the Clark''s nutcracker, which can transport the seeds long distances and cache them on exposed windswept sites (Lanner and Vander Wall 1980). This results in the regeneration of pines in clumps from forgotten caches (Eyre 1980, Steele et al. 1983).
Birds and small mammals often eat and cache the large, wingless pine seeds. Most important is the Clark''s nutcracker, which can transport the seeds long distances and cache them on exposed windswept sites (Lanner and Vander Wall 1980). This results in the regeneration of pines in clumps from forgotten caches (Eyre 1980, Steele et al. 1983).
Environmental Description: Woodlands included in this alliance occur intermittently from lower montane and foothill zones in central and northern Rocky Mountains, and on geographic breaks in the northwestern Great Plains. Elevations range from 850-2400 m. Sites are typically xeric on exposed, windswept rocky slopes and ridges. Some stands are on eroded substrates and resemble "badlands" while others may occur on lavaflows. These open woodlands occur on all aspects, but are most common on dry south- and west-facing slopes. Soils are typically shallow, skeletal and coarse-textured, such as gravelly, sandy loams or loams, but may include alkaline clays. Exposed bedrock is common and many stands have over 50% bare soil.
Adjacent vegetation at high elevations includes lower montane stands that are dominated by Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii. At lower elevations adjacent vegetation may include Juniperus-dominated woodlands and savannas; shrublands dominated by species of Artemisia, Cercocarpus, or Purshia tridentata; or dry prairie. The transition can be abrupt or an extended ecotone where patchy or open woodlands grade into a savanna and then prairie with scattered trees.
Adjacent vegetation at high elevations includes lower montane stands that are dominated by Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii. At lower elevations adjacent vegetation may include Juniperus-dominated woodlands and savannas; shrublands dominated by species of Artemisia, Cercocarpus, or Purshia tridentata; or dry prairie. The transition can be abrupt or an extended ecotone where patchy or open woodlands grade into a savanna and then prairie with scattered trees.
Geographic Range: This alliance occurs in foothill and lower montane zones in the Rocky Mountains from southern Alberta and northern Montana south to northern Colorado and on escarpments across Wyoming extending out into the western Great Plains.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: AB, CO, ID, MT, SD, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899547
Confidence Level: Low
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: Several associations from Old Alliance II.A.4.N.a. Pinus flexilis Woodland Alliance (A.540) are included in this alliance. A.540 (in part).
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: > Pinus flexilis / Juniperus osteosperma Community Type (DeVelice and Lesica 1993)
> Pinus flexilis / Juniperus scopulorum Community Type (Lesica and DeVelice 1992)
> Pinus flexilis / Juniperus scopulorum Community Type (DeVelice and Lesica 1993)
? Pinus flexilis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983)
? Pinus flexilis Habitat Type (USFS 1992)
? Pinus flexilis Series (Johnston 1987)
? Pinus flexilis Series (Girard et al. 1989)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (High Density Limber Pine) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (High Total Cover) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (Low Total Cover) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
> Pinus flexilis / Juniperus scopulorum Community Type (Lesica and DeVelice 1992)
> Pinus flexilis / Juniperus scopulorum Community Type (DeVelice and Lesica 1993)
? Pinus flexilis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983)
? Pinus flexilis Habitat Type (USFS 1992)
? Pinus flexilis Series (Johnston 1987)
? Pinus flexilis Series (Girard et al. 1989)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (High Density Limber Pine) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (High Total Cover) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
> Limber Pine / Antelope Bitterbrush (Low Total Cover) Vegetation Type (Day 1985)
- Alexander, R. M. 1986. Classification of the forest vegetation of Wyoming. Research Note RM-466. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 10 pp.
- Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. General Technical Report RM-123. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp.
- Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
- Cooper, S. V. 1975. Forest habitat types of northwestern Wyoming and contiguous portion of Montana and Idaho. Unpublished dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. 190 pp.
- Day, T. A. 1985. Plant association and soil factors in primary succession on cinder cones in Idaho. Unpublished thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow. 62 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L. 1992. Classification of the plant communities of Beaverhead, Silver Bow, and Madison counties, Montana. Volume I (text). Prepared for the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp.
- DeVelice, R. L., and P. Lesica. 1993. Plant community classification for vegetation on BLM lands, Pryor Mountains, Carbon County, Montana. Unpublished report by Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 78 pp.
- Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Girard, M. M., H. Goetz, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1989. Native woodland habitat types of southwestern North Dakota. Research Paper RM-281. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
- Hess, K. 1981. Phyto-edaphic study of habitat types of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 558 pp.
- Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
- Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1980. Forest vegetation of the Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-221. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 41 pp.
- Holland, R. F. 1986b. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Unpublished report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame-Heritage Program and Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento. 156 pp.
- Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
- Jones, G. P. 1989b. Survey of plant species and communities of interest in the Beaver Rim Area of Critical Environmental Concern. Report submitted to the Bureau of Land Management, Rawlins District Office, under Work Effort No. WY030-09-4352-06-2512. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY.
- Lanner, R. M., and S. B. Vander Wall. 1980. Dispersal of limber pine seed by Clark''s nutcracker. Journal of Forestry 78(10):637-639.
- Lesica, P., and R. L. DeVelice. 1992. Plant communities of the Pryor Mountains. Preliminary report prepared by the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.
- MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.
- Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
- Peet, R. K. 1978a. Latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests. Journal of Biogeography 5:275-289.
- Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45:3-75.
- Peet, R. K. 1988. Forests of the Rocky Mountains. Pages 64-101 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
- Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
- Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
- Terwilliger, C., K. Hess, and C. Wasser. 1979a. Key to the preliminary habitat types of Region 2. Addendum to initial progress report for habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO.
- USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1992. Draft habitat types of the Little Missouri National Grasslands. Medora and McKenzie ranger districts, Custer National Forest. Dickinson, ND.
- Wasser, C. H., and K. Hess. 1982. The habitat types of Region II. USDA Forest Service: A synthesis. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 140 pp.