Print Report

A3423 Populus deltoides Floodplain Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance, found throughout the Great Plains, contains riverfront floodplain forests with a canopy nearly always dominated by Populus deltoides and occurring on alluvial soils.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern Cottonwood Floodplain Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Eastern Cottonwood Floodplain Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance, found throughout the Great Plains, contains riverfront floodplain forests. The tree canopy height varies with time since last major disturbance and can reach as much as 30 m, though it is usually shorter. The canopy is nearly always dominated by Populus deltoides, often with few other abundant associates. Fraxinus pennsylvanica can be codominant, particularly in the northern part of this alliance''s range. Platanus occidentalis and Celtis laevigata can be codominant to dominant in the southern part of this alliance''s range. Other common associates are Acer negundo and Ulmus americana. Tree diversity is limited due to the dynamics of flooding and deposition/scouring of sediments. The shrub layer is sparse to dense, with species such as Cornus drummondii, Cornus sericea, Prunus virginiana, Salix exigua, and Symphoricarpos occidentalis. Herbaceous growth can be thick and lush but is often patchy and sparse due to frequent inundation. Herbaceous species found throughout the range of this alliance are not well known, but in parts of the range, species can include Pascopyrum smithii and Panicum virgatum (throughout the range), Carex spp., Juncus spp., Leymus cinereus, and Elymus canadensis (common in the northern Great Plains), and Amphicarpaea bracteata, Carex blanda, Geum canadense, Parietaria pensylvanica, and others in the central Great Plains. Due to the frequent disturbance, weedy species are almost ubiquitous in the understory, especially Poa pratensis, Bromus inermis, Melilotus officinalis, Ambrosia spp., and Urtica spp. Stands are found primarily along riverfronts, where they develop on bare, moist soil on newly made sandbars, front-land ridges, and well-drained flats. Soils are formed in alluvium, are deep, medium-textured, and with adequate or excessive moisture available for vegetation during the growing season.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Floodplain forests in the Great Plains, usually dominated by Populus deltoides, though sometimes Ulmus spp. and Celtis laevigata can be dominant in Oklahoma.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: More open-canopied stands of this alliance can be very similar to ~Populus deltoides Floodplain Woodland Alliance (A0636)$$. Distinguishing them is likely to be difficult.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The tree layer is dominated by tall (20-35 m in height) single-stemmed deciduous species. The canopy is overlapping, generally forming 60-100% cover. The shrub layer is also dense with up to 60% cover, and often multi-tiered, with both tall and short shrubs. The herbaceous layer is dominated by forbs with up to 20% cover. In parts of this alliance''s range, graminoid cover is primarily from introduced grass species.

Floristics: The tree canopy of this alliance is tall (to 30 m) and nearly always dominated by Populus deltoides, although Acer negundo, Celtis laevigata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Platanus occidentalis, Salix nigra, and Ulmus americana are also commonly encountered in various parts of this alliance''s range. Tree diversity is limited due to the dynamics of flooding and deposition/scouring of sediments. The shrub layer is sparse to dense, with species such as Cornus drummondii, Cornus sericea, Prunus virginiana, Salix exigua, and Symphoricarpos occidentalis. Herbaceous growth can be thick and lush but is often patchy and sparse due to frequent inundation. Herbaceous species found throughout the range of this alliance are not well known, but in parts of the range, species can include Pascopyrum smithii and Panicum virgatum (throughout the range), Carex spp., Juncus spp., Leymus cinereus, and Elymus canadensis (common in the northern Great Plains), and Amphicarpaea bracteata, Carex blanda, Geum canadense, Parietaria pensylvanica and others in the central Great Plains. Due to the frequent disturbance, weedy species are almost ubiquitous in the understory, especially Poa pratensis, Bromus inermis, Melilotus officinalis, Ambrosia spp., and Urtica spp.

Dynamics:  Cottonwood forests grow within an alluvial environment that is continually changing due to the ebb and flow of the river. Riparian vegetation is constantly being "re-set" by flooding disturbance. Cottonwood communities are early-, mid- or late-seral, depending on the age class of the trees and the associated species of the stand. Mature cottonwood stands do not regenerate in place, but regenerate by "moving" up and down a river reach. Over time, a healthy riparian area supports all stages of cottonwood communities. The process of cottonwood regeneration is well-documented. Periodic flooding events can leave sandbars of bare, mineral substrate. Cottonwood seedlings germinate and become established on newly-deposited, moist sandbars. In the absence of large floods in subsequent years, seedlings begin to trap sediment. In time, the sediment accumulates and the sandbar rises. The young forest community is then above the annual flood zone of the river channel. In this newly elevated position, with an absence of excessive browsing, fire, or agricultural conversion, this cottonwood community can grow into a mature riparian forest. At the same time, the river channel continually erodes streambanks and creates fresh, new surfaces for cottonwood establishment. This results in a dynamic patchwork of different age classes, plant associations and habitats. As cottonwoods mature, other tree species may become established. If the land surface is subject to reworking by the river, the successional processes will start over with erosion and subsequent flooding deposition. If the land surface is not subject to alluvial processes, for example on a high terrace, the cottonwoods will be replaced by upland shrub or tree species from adjacent areas.

Environmental Description:  Stands of this alliance are found primarily along riverfronts, where they develop on bare, moist soil on newly formed sandbars, front-land ridges, low streambanks, overflow areas, and well-drained flats along major streams and rivers. Stands can also be found on abandoned fields and well-drained ridges in the first bottoms. These sites tend to be further from the main channel. Elevations range from 300 m in the central Great Plains to 1300 m in the western Great Plains. Soils are formed in alluvium, are deep, medium-textured, and with adequate or excessive moisture available for vegetation during the growing season. Typically, the soil profile is highly stratified, but with distinct soil development (B) layers. Textures are predominately loose, friable sands interspersed with narrow bands of clay loams and sandy clays.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in the Great Plains from southeastern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan, through the Dakotas and Montana south to the Texas Panhandle and Oklahoma.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, KS, MT, ND, NE, OK, SD, SK, TX, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: New alliance equal the Great Plains portion of old A.290. A.290, in part

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Populus deltoides Dominance Type (Hansen et al. 1988b)
? Populus deltoides forest alliance (Hoagland 1998a)
>< Populus-Salix wetland forest (No. 24) (Vankat 1990)
>< Cottonwood: 63 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): J. Drake, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: J. Drake

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-18-14

  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and Midwest State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. 1996. Terrestrial vegetation of the midwest United States. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P. L., S. W. Chadde, and R. D. Pfister. 1988b. Riparian dominance types of Montana. University of Montana Miscellaneous Publication 49. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula. 411 pp.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • Hoagland, B. W. 1998a. Classification of Oklahoma vegetation types. Working draft. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory, Norman. 43 pp.
  • Van Auken, O. W., and J. K. Bush. 1988. Dynamics of establishment, growth, and development of black willow and cottonwood in the San Antonio River forest. Texas Journal of Science 40:269-277.
  • Vankat, J. L. 1990. A classification of the forest types of North America. Vegetatio 88:53-66.