Print Report

A3341 Taxodium ascendens / Carex striata Swamp Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: Taxodium ascendens dominates the canopy of this woodland vegetation with Nyssa biflora or Pinus serotina over Hypericum fasciculatum and graminoid wetland herbaceous plants, which can form a thick mat in the soggy substrate of coastal plain swales, limesinks, depression ponds and cypress stringers.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Pond-cypress / Walter''s Sedge Swamp Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Pond-cypress / Walter''s Sedge Depression Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: Taxodium ascendens dominates the canopy of this woodland vegetation with Nyssa biflora and Pinus serotina being fairly common. Acer rubrum and Liquidambar styraciflua may reach the canopy. A well-developed shrub layer is not common, but when fire has been infrequent, Clethra alnifolia, Lyonia lucida, Magnolia virginiana, Persea palustris, Smilax laurifolia, and/or Smilax walteri will be found. More commonly Hypericum fasciculatum will occur as a low shrub even under a frequent burn regime. The most common herbaceous plants are Carex striata, Carex turgescens, and various Rhynchospora species. The sedges Carex striata, Rhynchospora cephalantha, and Rhynchospora careyana tend to form a thick mat in the soggy substrate. This woodland vegetation occurs in coastal plain swales, limesinks, depression ponds and cypress stringers.

Diagnostic Characteristics: The deciduous conifer Taxodium ascendens dominates the canopy. The most common herbaceous plants are Carex striata, Carex turgescens, and various Rhynchospora species. These and other graminoid wetland herbaceous plants can form a thick mat in the soggy substrate of coastal plain swales, limesinks, depression ponds and cypress stringers where this vegetation occurs.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: These are Taxodium ascendens-dominated depressions and stringers which have a significant herbaceous component, especially Carex striata, Carex turgescens, and various Rhynchospora species.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The deciduous conifer Taxodium ascendens dominates the canopy and graminoid wetland herbaceous plants dominate the herbaceous layer. Some examples may have Taxodium ascendens trees shorter than 5 m (16 feet), especially around the margins of cypress domes in shallower water and thinner soil.

Floristics: Taxodium ascendens dominates the canopy of this woodland vegetation with Nyssa biflora and Pinus serotina being fairly common. Acer rubrum and Liquidambar styraciflua may reach the canopy. A well-developed shrub layer is not common, but when fire has been infrequent, Clethra alnifolia, Lyonia lucida, Magnolia virginiana, Persea palustris, Smilax laurifolia, and/or Smilax walteri will be found. More commonly Hypericum fasciculatum will occur as a low shrub even under a frequent burn regime. The most common herbaceous plants are Carex striata, Carex turgescens, and various Rhynchospora species. The sedges Carex striata, Rhynchospora cephalantha, and Rhynchospora careyana tend to form a thick mat in the soggy substrate. Other prominent herbs may include Eriocaulon compressum, Lachnanthes caroliana, Lobelia boykinii, Panicum hemitomon, Paspalum praecox, Rhexia aristosa, Rhynchospora spp. (Rhynchospora careyana, Rhynchospora cephalantha, Rhynchospora filifolia), Saccharum spp. (Saccharum brevibarbe var. contortum, Saccharum giganteum), and Xyris spp. (Xyris brevifolia, Xyris fimbriata, Xyris smalliana). Scleria baldwinii and Cladium mariscus ssp. jamaicense can be significant herbaceous components, especially in Florida.

Dynamics:  A frequent fire regime will maintain the open herbaceous layer and reduce hardwood trees and shrubs as well. Large year-to-year variations in the amount and duration of flooding serve to promote herbaceous cover and diversity, and limit the survival of tree seedlings, which helps maintain the open woodland physiognomy.

Environmental Description:  This alliance consists of Taxodium ascendens woodlands and savannas that have a variable hydroperiod, but flood for most of the winter and generally dry down to a water level below the soil surface by late summer. These sites are found in shallow depressions where woodland structure is favored; deeper ponds tend to have closed canopies. Woodlands in this alliance most often occur in coastal plain swales, limesinks, depression ponds, cypress stringers and other seasonally flooded wetlands.

Geographic Range: Occurs in the Southern Coastal Plain from southeastern North Carolina to Florida and west to southern Mississippi and southeastern Louisiana.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.336, A.651 in part

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Cypress Dome (Olmsted et al. 1980b)
? Cypress Dome Forest (Hilsenbeck et al. 1979)
? Cypress Forests (Gunderson and Loftus 1993)
? Cypress Prairie (Gunderson and Loftus 1993)
= Cypress Savanna (Schafale and Weakley 1990)
? Cypress Strand Forest (Hilsenbeck et al. 1979)
>< Dome Swamp (FNAI 1992a)
? Dome Swamp, Cypress Dome subtype (FNAI 1992b)
? Dwarf Cypress (Gunderson and Loftus 1993)
? Hatrack Cypress (Gunderson and Loftus 1993)
>< IIA10a. Pond Cypress Forest (Allard 1990)
? IIA5b. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp Forest (Allard 1990)
? IIB2a. Pond Cypress Savanna (Allard 1990)
? Open-canopy ("Hatrack") Cypress Forest (Hilsenbeck et al. 1979)
>< Pondcypress: 100 (Eyre 1980)
>< Small Depression Pond (Schafale and Weakley 1990)
>< Strand Swamp (FNAI 1992a)
? Strand Swamp, Cypress Strand subtype (FNAI 1992b)

Concept Author(s): M.P. Schafale and A.S. Weakley (1990)

Author of Description: C. Nordman

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-08-14

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Bennett, S. H., and J. B. Nelson. 1991. Distribution and status of Carolina bays in South Carolina. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Nongame and Heritage Trust Section, Columbia. 88 pp.
  • Brown, S. 1981. A comparison of the structure, primary productivity, and transpiration of cypress ecosystems in Florida. Ecological Monographs 51:403-427.
  • Clewell, A. F. 1971. The vegetation of the Apalachicola National Forest: An ecological perspective. Unpublished document. USDA Forest Service, Tallahassee, FL. 152 pp.
  • Clewell, A. F. 1981. Natural setting and vegetation of the Florida Panhandle: An account of the environments and plant communities of northern Florida west of the Suwannee River. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Mobile, AL. 773 pp.
  • Duever, M. J., J. F. Meeder, and L. C. Duever. 1984. Ecosystems of the Big Cypress Swamp. Pages 294-303 in: K. C. Ewel and H. T. Odum, editors. Cypress swamps. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • FNAI [Florida Natural Areas Inventory]. 1992a. Natural communities. Unpublished document. The Nature Conservancy, Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee. 6 pp.
  • FNAI [Florida Natural Areas Inventory]. 1992b. Natural community classification. Unpublished document. The Nature Conservancy, Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee. 16 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Folkerts, G. W. 1997. Citronelle Ponds: Little-known wetlands of the central Gulf Coastal Plain, USA. Natural Areas Journal 17:6-16.
  • Gunderson, L. H., and W. F. Loftus. 1993. The Everglades. Pages 199-255 in: W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht, editors. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 502 pp.
  • Hilsenbeck, C. E., R. H. Hofstetter, and T. R. Alexander. 1979. Preliminary synopsis of major plant communities in the East Everglades area: Vegetation map supplement. Unpublished document. Metropolitan Dade County Planning Department, Miami, FL.
  • Huck, R. B. 1987. Plant communities along an edaphic continuum in a central Florida watershed. Florida Scientist 50:111-128.
  • LNHP [Louisiana Natural Heritage Program]. 2009. Natural communities of Louisiana. Louisiana Natural Heritage Program, Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Baton Rouge. 46 pp. [http://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/page_wildlife/6776-Rare%20Natural%20Communities/LA_NAT_COM.pdf]
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Olmsted, I. C., L. L. Loope, and R. E. Rintz. 1980b. A survey and baseline analysis of aspects of the vegetation of Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park. USDI National Park Service, Everglades National Park, South Florida Resource Center. Report T-586. Homestead, FL. 71 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H. 1978. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta. 227 pp.