Print Report

A3266 Atriplex canescens - Ericameria nauseosa Desert Wash Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance consists of shrublands, generally dominated by Atriplex canescens and/or Ericameria nauseosa. Several other shrub species may appear in the stand. These are shrublands of cold desert washes of Arizona, Colorado, Nevada and Utah with low cover of mixes of short shrubs.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Fourwing Saltbush - Rubber Rabbitbrush Desert Wash Alliance

Colloquial Name: Fourwing Saltbush - Rubber Rabbitbrush Desert Wash

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance covers desert wash shrublands dominated by Atriplex canescens and/or Ericameria nauseosa. Associated shrubs include Artemisia filifolia, Artemisia tridentata, Atriplex confertifolia, Atriplex gardneri, Brickellia longifolia, Ephedra torreyana, Ephedra viridis, Fraxinus anomala, Gutierrezia sarothrae, Lycium andersonii, Purshia stansburiana, Rhus trilobata, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, and Suaeda moquinii. The herbaceous stratum has sparse to moderate cover of Achnatherum hymenoides, Artemisia dracunculus, Descurainia pinnata, Elymus elymoides, Glycyrrhiza lepidota, Hesperostipa comata, Hordeum jubatum, Sphaeralcea parvifolia, Sporobolus contractus, and Sporobolus cryptandrus. These shrubland are short-statured (<2 m in height), mixed species with fairly open canopy coverage. They can be found in cold desert washes of northern Arizona, Colorado, Nevada and Utah.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Open to scattered cover (1-25%) of short shrubs lining arroyos and intermittent drainages.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Alliance of cold desert washes with sparsely scattered cover of either of the three shrub species.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Shrublands of facultatively deciduous, extremely xeromorphic shrubs with open to moderately dense canopy that is less than 2 m tall. The herbaceous layer is relatively sparse (20-30% cover) and is usually less than 0.5 m tall. It is codominated by perennial grasses and forbs. Annual graminoids and forbs are seasonally present.

Floristics: These shrublands lining desert washes are dominated by Atriplex canescens and/or Ericameria nauseosa. Associated shrubs include Artemisia filifolia, Artemisia tridentata, Atriplex confertifolia, Atriplex gardneri, Brickellia longifolia, Ephedra torreyana, Ephedra viridis, Fraxinus anomala, Gutierrezia sarothrae, Lycium andersonii, Purshia stansburiana, Rhus trilobata, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, and Suaeda moquinii (= Suaeda torreyana). The herbaceous layer can vary from moderately dense and dominated by graminoids to absent. Common native grasses include Achnatherum hymenoides (= Oryzopsis hymenoides), Distichlis spicata, Elymus elymoides, Elymus trachycaulus ssp. trachycaulus, Leymus flavescens (= Elymus flavescens), Pseudoroegneria spicata, Sporobolus airoides, Sporobolus cryptandrus, Sporobolus flexuosus, Sporobolus nealleyi, and Sporobolus wrightii. Native forbs generally have low cover, but may include species such as Abronia fragrans, Cleome lutea, Gayophytum ramosissimum, Lygodesmia grandiflora, Machaeranthera canescens (= Aster canescens), Mentzelia multiflora, Navarretia sp., Phacelia hastata (= Phacelia leucophylla), Phacelia spp., Psoralidium lanceolatum (= Psoralea lanceolata), and Sphaeralcea coccinea. Disturbed stands typically have high cover of introduced annual Bromus species such as Bromus tectorum, Bromus arvensis (= Bromus japonicus), and Bromus rubens. Introduced forbs may include Melilotus officinalis, Salsola kali, and Bassia scoparia (= Kochia scoparia).

Dynamics:  This alliance occurs in washes and therefore experiences flash floods from time to time. Shrubs generally resprout after severe flood scour.

Environmental Description:  This alliance occurs in areas of high natural disturbance such as on steep colluvial slopes, along drainages or in floodplains and washes. The soils are well-drained, moderately deep and coarse-textured with a sandy surface over sandy loams. Soils are derived from sandy/gravelly alluvium. Elevations range from 670-2250 m (2198-7381 feet). Substrates may be eolian, alluvial, colluvial or derived from sandstone residuum. Soils are variable but are generally well-drained and coarse-textured.

Shrublands included in this alliance occur on lowland and upland sites throughout much of the arid and semi-arid western U.S. with elevations ranging from 75 m below sea level to 2400 m. Lowland sites include alluvial flats, drainage terraces, playas, washes and interdunal basins. The lowland sites may be moderately saline or alkaline. Bare ground usually dominates the ground surface.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada and Utah.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CA, CO, NV, UT




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.835, A.869

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Atriplex canescens Association (153.272) (Brown 1982a) [included within Chihuahuan Desertscrub, Saltbush Series.]
> Ericameria nauseosa (Rubber rabbitbrush scrub) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [35.310.00]
> Ericameria nauseosa Shrubland Alliance (Evens et al. 2014)
> Lepidospartum squamatum (Scale broom scrub) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [32.070.00]
> Lepidospartum squamatum Alliance (Scale broom scrub) (Buck-Diaz et al. 2012)

Concept Author(s): G. Kittel, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: G. Kittel

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-19-15

  • Aldous, A. E., and H. L. Shantz. 1924. Types of vegetation in the semiarid portion of the United States and their economic significance. Journal of Agricultural Research 28(2):99-128.
  • BIA [Bureau of Indian Affairs]. 1979. The secretarial land use plan for the addition to the Havasupai Indian Reservation. Unpublished draft Environmental Statement INT DES 79-42. Prepared by USDI Bureau of Indian Affairs, Phoenix Area Office with the assistance of Office of Arid Land Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson.
  • Brown, D. E., editor. 1982a. Biotic communities of the American Southwest-United States and Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 4(1-4):1-342.
  • Buck-Diaz, J., S. Batiuk, and J. M. Evens. 2012. Vegetation alliances and associations of the Great Valley ecoregion, California. California Native Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/pdf/great_valley_eco-vegclass2012.pdf]
  • Culver, D. R., M. A. March, S. M. Kettler, and C. A. Pague. 1996. Natural Heritage Inventory of significant animals and plants and classification of riparian plant associations: Timpas Grazing District and Kim Grazing Association. Report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Pike-San Isabel National Forest, La Junta, CO, by Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins.
  • Evens, J. M., D. Roach-McIntosh, and D. Stout. 2012. Vegetation descriptions for Joshua Tree National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI, National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
  • Evens, J. M., K. Sikes, D. Hastings, and J. Ratchford. 2014. Vegetation alliance descriptions for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Death Valley National Park and Mojave National Preserve. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Hyder, D. N., R. E. Bement, E. E. Remmenga, and C. Terwilliger, Jr. 1966. Vegetation-soils and vegetation-grazing relations from frequency data. Journal of Range Management 19:11-17.
  • Maxwell, E. L. 1975. Multispectral analysis of rangeland conditions. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 198 pp.
  • Miller, D. A., D. A. Mouat, and B. D. Treadwell. 1977. Remote sensing analysis and literature survey pertaining to the vegetation of the Petrified Forest National Park. Report of work performed under NASA and the National Park Service. 48 pp.
  • Peterson, E. B. 2008. International Vegetation Classification alliances and associations occurring in Nevada with proposed additions. Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Carson City, NV. 348 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., L. S. Engelking, and P. S. Bourgeron. 1994. Rare plant communities of the conterminous United States, Western Region. Pages 305-620 in: D. H. Grossman, K. L. Goodin, and C. L. Reuss, editors. Rare plant communities of the conterminous United States, an initial survey. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Roberts, D. W., D. W. Wight, and G. P. Hallsten. 1992. Plant community distribution and dynamics in Bryce Canyon National Park. Unpublished final report for Bryce Canyon National Park Project PX1200-7-0966. 146 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Shaw, R. B., S. L. Anderson, K. A. Schultz, and V. E. Diersing. 1989. Plant communities, ecological checklist, and species list for the U.S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado. Colorado State University, Department of Range Science, Science Series No. 37, Fort Collins. 71 pp.
  • Shute, D., and N. E. West. 1978. The application of ECOSYM vegetation classifications to rangelands near Price, Utah. Appendix reports 14 and 16 in: J. A. Henderson, L. S. Davis, and E. M. Ryberg, editors. ECOSYM: A classification and information system for wildland resource management. Utah State University, Logan. 53 pp.
  • Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Range site descriptions for Colorado. Technical Guide, Section II-E. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Colorado State Office, Denver.
  • Soil Conservation Service. No date. Range site descriptions of vegetation in Colorado. Unpublished report series MLRA dating from 1975 to 1989. Soil Conservation Service, Colorado Field Office, Denver.
  • Stout, D., J. Buck-Diaz, S. Taylor, and J. M. Evens. 2013. Vegetation mapping and accuracy assessment report for Carrizo Plain National Monument. California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program, Sacramento, CA. 71 pp.
  • USBOR [U.S. Bureau of Reclamation]. 1976. Flora and terrestrial vertebrate studies of the Grand Valley, Colorado. Pages 56-85 and 283-354 in: Final report to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation by Ecology Consultants, Inc., Fort Collins, CO.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1937. Range plant handbook. Dover Publications Inc., New York. 816 pp.
  • VegCAMP and AIS [Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program and Aerial Information Systems, Inc.]. 2013. 2012 California desert vegetation map and accuracy assessment in support of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. Unpublished report to California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program and Aerial Information Systems, Inc.
  • Vest, E. D. 1962a. Biotic communities in the Great Salt Lake Desert. Institute of Environmental Biological Research, Ecology and Epizoology Series 73. Division of Biological Science, University of Utah. 122 pp.
  • Warren, P. L., K. L. Reichhardt, D. A. Mouat, B. T. Brown, and R. R. Johnson. 1982. Vegetation of Grand Canyon National Park. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit Technical Report 9. Tucson, AZ. 140 pp.