Print Report

A3211 Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana Great Plains Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance is found in mesic ravines or draws in the northern and central Great Plains with an open to closed short tree canopy typically dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Ulmus americana.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Green Ash - American Elm Great Plains Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Great Plains Ash - Elm Ravine Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance is found in the northern and central Great Plains. Tree canopy is variable, ranging from open to closed. Trees are often short (5-10 m tall) and dominant trees are Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Ulmus americana. Acer negundo can also be common in some stands and Populus deltoides may be scattered. The shrub layer can be sparse to dense. Prunus virginiana and Symphoricarpos occidentalis are common shrubs. Sites are usually found in mesic ravines and draws that concentrate the available precipitation by receiving runoff from higher uplands and trapping drifting snow. Some stands may be inundated for brief periods in the spring or after heavy rains but flooding does not persist. Rarely, stands of this alliance can be found upper terraces of rivers or streams or on north- or east-facing hillsides. Fires from adjacent upland prairies do not usually move through these sites due to the more mesic conditions and the lower landscape position.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Fraxinus pennsylvanica- and Ulmus americana-dominated stands in ravines but not on active floodplains.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: There are many associations that share dominant canopy species with this alliance and distinguishing those from this alliance where the ranges overlap could be difficult. Other associations dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Ulmus americana, and Acer negundo in the Great Plains may have some similarity to this alliance but they are found on true floodplains and experience more frequent flooding.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Stands of this alliance have a short tree canopy (5-10 m) composed of cold-deciduous trees (USACE 1979, Girard et al. 1989). The canopy is moderately closed to closed. There is usually a deciduous shrub layer but height and cover are variable. Short evergreen trees are present or dominate in the shrub or subcanopy layers in some stands. The herbaceous layer cover is variable, typically in inverse proportion to the cover of trees and shrubs above it.

Floristics: Across the range of this alliance, the most abundant tree species are Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Ulmus americana. Acer negundo is present to codominant in many stands. Celtis spp., Populus deltoides, and Quercus macrocarpa are often present and become more common in the eastern portion of this alliance''s range. Populus tremuloides and Tilia americana occur only in the east. Common shrubs include Juniperus scopulorum, Rosa spp., Prunus americana, Prunus virginiana, Ribes spp., Symphoricarpos occidentalis, and Vitis spp. Herbaceous species of this alliance include Carex spp., Elymus spp., Maianthemum stellatum, Poa pratensis, Piptatheropsis micrantha (= Oryzopsis micrantha), and Taraxacum spp.

Dynamics:  Stands of this alliance are typically in ravines and can be flooded or saturated for brief periods after heavy rains or spring snowmelt. Flooding does not shape this alliance to the extent that it does communities on true floodplains, though. Fires spreading from adjacent grasslands can burn the edges of stands but does not usually spread through the entire stand. In Nebraska, stands are becoming more ruderal.

Environmental Description:  This alliance is found in upland ravines, upper terraces of rivers and streams, and, rarely, on north- or east-facing slopes (Rolfsmeier and Steinauer 2010). Sites are usually found in mesic ravines and draws that concentrate the available precipitation by receiving runoff from higher uplands and trapping drifting snow. Some stands may be inundated for brief periods in the spring or after heavy rains but flooding does not persist.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in the northern Great Plains from the southern Canadian Prairie Provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan south through eastern Montana, eastern Wyoming to Nebraska. In the east it extends into central North and South Dakota.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MB, MT, ND, NE, SD, SK, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: One association from two old alliances (A.259, A.629).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Green Ash - Eastern Red Cedar Scarp Woodland (Rolfsmeier and Steinauer 2010) [Green Ash - Elm - Hackberry Canyon Bottom Woodland and Green Ash - Eastern Red Cedar Scarp Woodland equal A3211 in Nebraska.]
> Green Ash - Elm - Hackberry Canyon Bottom Woodland (Rolfsmeier and Steinauer 2010) [Green Ash - Elm - Hackberry Canyon Bottom Woodland and Green Ash - Eastern Red Cedar Scarp Woodland equal A3211 in Nebraska.]

Concept Author(s): J. Drake, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: J. Drake

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-18-14

  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and Midwest State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. 1996. Terrestrial vegetation of the midwest United States. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Girard, M. M., H. Goetz, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1989. Native woodland habitat types of southwestern North Dakota. Research Paper RM-281. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., G. R. Hoffman, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1984. The vegetation of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-113. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P. L., and G. R. Hoffman. 1988. The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-157. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 68 pp.
  • Jones, G. P. 1990. Initial study of deciduous woodlands and thickets at Devil''s Tower National Monument. Report submitted to the National Park Service, Devil''s Tower National Monument, under order number PX-1390-9-0073. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie.
  • Rolfsmeier, S. B., and G. Steinauer. 2010. Terrestrial ecological systems and natural communities of Nebraska (Version IV - March 9, 2010). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. Lincoln, NE. 228 pp.
  • USACE [U.S. Army Corps of Engineers]. 1979. A cultural resources reconnaissance of the federal lands on the east bank of Lake Francis Case, South Dakota. U.S. Army Engineer District, Corps of Engineers, Omaha, NE.