Print Report

A3210 Juniperus scopulorum - Juniperus virginiana Woodland Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This woodland alliance is found in the western Great Plains of the United States where Juniperus scopulorum and Juniperus virginiana dominate the short, open tree canopy on steep north-facing slopes or ravines.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Rocky Mountain Juniper - Eastern Red-cedar Woodland Alliance

Colloquial Name: Great Plains Juniper Ravine Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance is found in the western Great Plains of the United States. The vegetation is an evergreen woodland with moderately open to dense cover of Juniperus scopulorum, Juniperus virginiana, or introgressant hybrids of the two. Woody species other than Juniperus scopulorum or Juniperus virginiana occur sporadically, but none achieves prominence. Most of the trees are small (10-20 cm dbh) and few exceed 6 m in height. Where the density of the tree canopy is high, the short-shrub and herbaceous strata are not well-developed. In more open places Piptatheropsis micrantha is often abundant. Other common herbaceous species include Campanula rotundifolia, Galium boreale, and Maianthemum stellatum. Mosses and lichens can cover much of the ground. Stands occur on steep (30-70%) north-facing slopes or in ravines. The soils are shallow and poorly developed; loamy sands and sandy loams predominate.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Hillsides or ravines dominated by Juniperus scopulorum (possibly Juniperus virginiana in the eastern portion of the alliance range).

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This description includes stands with both Juniperus scopulorum and Juniperus virginiana over a herbaceous layer, typically with Piptatheropsis micrantha. Pinus ponderosa, if present, is less than 25% tree canopy cover.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Vegetation included in this alliance has a moderate to dense tree canopy that is typically 2-6 m tall. Stands are dominated by evergreen scale-leaved trees. Scattered evergreen needle-leaved or deciduous broad-leaved trees may be present, but they never codominate. Lower vegetation layers are usually in inverse proportion to the tree canopy cover; sites with dense tree canopies have sparse lower strata. A sparse to moderately dense shrub layer may be present as a mixture of broadleaf and microphyllous, deciduous shrubs that are usually less than 2 m tall. A sparse to moderately dense herbaceous layer dominated by perennial graminoids is usually present. Perennial forbs may be scattered. Annual forbs and grasses may be seasonally present.

Floristics: This alliance is an evergreen woodland with moderately open to dense cover of Juniperus scopulorum, Juniperus virginiana, or introgressant hybrids of the two. Woody species other than Juniperus scopulorum or Juniperus virginiana occur sporadically, but none achieves prominence. Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Pinus ponderosa are the most common associates. Where the density of the tree canopy is high, the short-shrub and herbaceous strata are not well-developed. In more open places Piptatheropsis micrantha (= Oryzopsis micrantha) is often abundant. Other common herbaceous species include Campanula rotundifolia, Chenopodium fremontii, Chenopodium simplex, Galium boreale, and Maianthemum stellatum. Drier and more open-canopied examples of this alliance often have Bouteloua curtipendula, Pseudoroegneria spicata, and Schizachyrium scoparium in the herbaceous layer and Rhus trilobata and Ribes aureum var. villosum (= Ribes odoratum) in the shrub stratum (Brown 1971, Rolfsmeier and Steinauer 2010). Mosses and lichens can cover much of the ground.

Dynamics:  Altered fire regimes, cutting trees for fencing, and improper grazing by livestock have significant impacts on the quality of sites. Grazing by livestock can modify the fire regime by removing the fine fuels that carry fire.

Environmental Description:  This alliance is found on steep (30-70%) north-facing slopes or in ravines. The soils are shallow and poorly developed; loamy sands and sandy loams predominate except in badlands landscapes where finer-textured soils are abundant. Climate is semi-arid, continental with most of the 40-60 cm of annual precipitation occurring during the growing season.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in the western Great Plains of the United States. It is found in the Black Hills and the Badlands of North and South Dakota and Montana, and from the High Plains of eastern Wyoming and northeastern Colorado eastward to central Nebraska.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CO, MT, ND, NE, SD, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: Alliance composed of just one association from old A.506.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Juniperus - Agropyron Community (Brown 1971)
? Juniperus scopulorum Series (Johnston 1987)
? Juniperus scopulorum Series (Hess 1981)
>< Rocky Mountain Juniper: 220 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): J. Drake, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: J. Drake

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-18-14

  • Brown, R. W. 1971. Distribution of plant communities in southeastern Montana badlands. The American Midland Naturalist 85(2):458-477.
  • DeVelice, R. L., S. V. Cooper, J. T. McGarvey, J. Lichthardt, and P. S. Bourgeron. 1995. Plant communities of northeastern Montana: A first approximation. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 116 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and Midwest State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. 1996. Terrestrial vegetation of the midwest United States. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Francis, R. E. 1983. Sagebrush-steppe habitat types in northern Colorado: A first approximation. Pages 67-71 in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Southwestern habitat types. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Goodding, L. N. 1923. An interesting area of limber pine extending into southwestern Nebraska. Journal of Forestry 21:175-176.
  • Hansen, P. L. 1985. An ecological study of the vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest. Unpublished dissertation, South Dakota State University. 257 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., G. R. Hoffman, and A. J. Bjugstad. 1984. The vegetation of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-113. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., and G. R. Hoffman. 1988. The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-157. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 68 pp.
  • Hess, K. 1981. Phyto-edaphic study of habitat types of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 558 pp.
  • Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Moran, P. 1981a. Patterns of plant life at Pawnee National Grassland: A manual for the interpreter. Unpublished report prepared for the Pawnee National Grasslands, Greeley, CO. 88 pp.
  • Rolfsmeier, S. B., and G. Steinauer. 2010. Terrestrial ecological systems and natural communities of Nebraska (Version IV - March 9, 2010). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. Lincoln, NE. 228 pp.
  • Wasser, C. H., and K. Hess. 1982. The habitat types of Region II. USDA Forest Service: A synthesis. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 140 pp.
  • Wells, P. V. 1965. Scarp woodlands, transported soils, and concept of grassland climate in the Great Plains region. Science 148:246-249.