Print Report

A3130 Pinus taeda - Quercus alba / Viburnum spp. Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance accommodates mixed forests of the West Gulf Coastal Plain that are dominated by Pinus taeda, possibly with Pinus echinata, and mixed hardwoods, particularly Quercus alba, Quercus nigra, Quercus michauxii, Quercus pagoda, Quercus laurifolia, and Quercus phellos.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Loblolly Pine - White Oak / Viburnum species Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: West Gulf Coastal Plain Loblolly Pine - White Oak Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance accommodates mixed forests of the West Gulf Coastal Plain that are dominated by Pinus taeda, possibly with Pinus echinata, and mixed hardwoods, particularly Quercus alba, Quercus nigra, Quercus michauxii, Quercus pagoda, Quercus laurifolia, and Quercus phellos. Other associated hardwoods may include Nyssa sylvatica, Liquidambar styraciflua, Fagus grandifolia, Acer rubrum, Carya tomentosa, Carya cordiformis, and others. The subcanopy may include canopy species as well as Ilex opaca var. opaca, Ostrya virginiana, Carpinus caroliniana, Prunus mexicana, and Cornus florida. The short-shrub stratum may include canopy and subcanopy species, in addition to some combination of Callicarpa americana, Symplocos tinctoria, Morella cerifera, Vaccinium elliottii, Viburnum dentatum, and Viburnum acerifolium. This alliance includes natural forests occurring in the coastal plains west of the Mississippi River. Forests in this alliance dominate the landscape in the region between longleaf pine belt and Ouachitas, and west of longleaf pine range in Texas. Within the range of longleaf pine, this vegetation may occur on "peninsulas" in the Fragipan Loam Hills Subsection of Louisiana, and on hills in the western part of this subsection. The alliance also includes associations from some more non-acidic substrates, including hilltops and upper slopes in Louisiana associated with the Cook Mountain Formation and with calcareous prairies on the Fleming Formation in eastern Texas. It includes mesic to dry-mesic forests with mixed evergreen and deciduous canopies where Pinus echinata and one or more of the nominal Quercus spp. occur in varying ratios. In some associations Pinus taeda may be a dominant evergreen canopy component.

Diagnostic Characteristics: These are dry-mesic to mesic mixed pine-oak forests of the West Gulf Coastal Plain.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance has an overall more mesophytic species composition than the shortleaf pine - oak forests of ~Pinus echinata - Pinus taeda - Quercus stellata Forest Alliance (A3129)$$. In regard to the floristic distinctiveness of G013 and its alliances (A3129, A3130), the available data do not reveal any specifically diagnostic or differential species in relation to similar alliances in groups from other parts of the southern coastal plains (Atlantic and East Gulf). There are, however, diagnostic and differential species that distinguish these alliances from one another. This alliance (A3130) and the related A3129 represent vegetation restricted to the West Gulf Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. They are more geographically constrained than the former alliances, parts of which they replace.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The canopy cover in stands can range from nearly pure pine of either Pinus echinata or Pinus taeda singly or in combination to approximately 25% hardwood species. The short-shrub stratum is sparse to patchy. Vines may be sparse to moderately dense, and the herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense.

Floristics: Examples of this alliance have stands which are dominated by Pinus taeda and/or Pinus echinata. They may be highly variable in terms of species composition and density, due to their occurrence across a wide range of site conditions which range from dry-mesic to mesic. The canopy cover in stands can range from nearly pure pine of either Pinus echinata or Pinus taeda singly or in combination to approximately 25% hardwood species. Species composition tends to vary according to soil moisture with Pinus taeda and hardwoods such as Nyssa sylvatica, Quercus alba, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Symplocos tinctoria being more important on mesic-tending sites, and Pinus echinata attaining greater importance on drier sites. The short-shrub stratum is sparse to patchy and includes canopy seedlings and Callicarpa americana, Cornus florida, Morella cerifera, Symplocos tinctoria, Vaccinium elliottii, and Viburnum dentatum. Vines may be sparse to moderately dense and include Gelsemium sempervirens, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Smilax pumila, Smilax rotundifolia, Toxicodendron radicans, and Vitis rotundifolia. The herbaceous layer is sparse to moderately dense and includes Chasmanthium sessiliflorum, Carex spp., Eupatorium perfoliatum, Mitchella repens, and Polystichum acrostichoides. This description is based on one association which seems somewhat typical of the alliance, a natural forest known from the West Gulf Coastal Plain of Arkansas, Louisiana, eastern Texas, and southeastern Oklahoma, ~Pinus (echinata, taeda) / Symplocos tinctoria - Morella cerifera - Vaccinium elliottii Forest (CEGL008410)$$.

Dynamics:  The influence and historical importance of fire on this vegetation is not completely understood. Examples of this alliance typically occur in areas where fire-return intervals were longer than in adjacent pyrogenic communities. Natural examples occur in fire-infrequent areas and likely only occurred here when adjacent pyrogenic communities burned (Martin and Smith 1993). Occasional fires, especially during particularly dry periods, have the potential to dramatically alter species composition of these forests, and could help perpetuate the Pinus taeda component. In most cases, Pinus taeda regenerates in canopy gaps created by tree falls (Martin and Smith 1993). Primary causes of such canopy gaps are Pinus taeda''s susceptibility to windthrow and blowdown damage (Baker and Langdon 1990), and southern pine beetles (Clarke et al. 2000). The extent to which individual stands developed following disturbances such as these may be difficult to discern; however, in areas where historical vegetation patterns are well known, or where evidence of disturbances are more obvious, it is quite possible. Successional Pinus taeda forests have replaced large areas of original Pinus palustris- and Pinus echinata-dominated vegetation.

Environmental Description:  These forests occur on middle and lower slopes, protected ravines, broad flats and second bottoms. Within the longleaf pine belt, they may occur on ridges and upper slopes in areas topographically isolated from fire-prone uplands. Within the range of longleaf pine, this vegetation may occur on "peninsulas" in the Fragipan Loam Hills Subsection of Louisiana, and on hills in the western part of this subsection. Soils are acidic and include silt loams, sandy loams underlain by clay, silty clays and clays. Caddo silt loam is a typical soil series.

Geographic Range: Vegetation of this alliance is found in the West Gulf Coastal Plain and Upper West Gulf Coastal Plain, from Arkansas and Louisiana west to Oklahoma and Texas. One type ranges into the Gulf Coast Prairies and Marshes ecoregion.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AR, LA, OK, TX




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: parts of A.404, A.129, A.394.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): M. Pyne, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: M. Pyne

Acknowledgements: We have incorporated significant descriptive information previously compiled by Dorothy Allard, Sally Landaal, Rob Evans, Karen Patterson, and Alan Weakley.

Version Date: 01-08-14

  • Baker, J. B., and O. G. Langdon. 1990. Pinus taeda L. Loblolly pine. Pages 497-512 in: R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. USDA Forest Service. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington, DC.
  • Cain, M. D., and M. G. Shelton. 1994. Indigenous vegetation in a southern Arkansas pine-hardwood forest after a half century without catastrophic disturbances. Natural Areas Journal 14:165-174.
  • Campbell, J. J. N., S. Walker, and D. Zollner. 1996. Technical assessment to: An ecological assessment of forest lands in Arkansas and Oklahoma proposed for inclusion into the Ouachita National Forest and Cossatot National Wildlife Refuge. Unpublished report by The Nature Conservancy. 114 pp.
  • Clarke, S. R., R. E. Evans, and R. F. Billings. 2000. Influence of pine bark beetles on the West Gulf Coastal Plain. Texas Journal of Science 52(4) supplement:105-126.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.
  • Foti, T., and J. M. Guldin. 1994. Multivariate analysis of the ground cover layer, shrub layer, midstory and overstory of the Ouachita/Ozark national forests. Pages 61-73 in: J. B. Baker, compiler. Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecosystem Management Research in the Ouachita Mountains: Pretreatment conditions and preliminary findings. General Technical Report SO-112. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA.
  • Fountain, M. S., and J. M. Sweeney. 1985. Ecological assessment of the Roaring Branch Research Natural Area. Research Paper SO-213. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA. 15 pp.
  • Fountain, M. S., and J. M. Sweeney. 1987. Ecological assessment of the Lake Winona Research Natural Area. Research Paper SO-235. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA. 14 pp.
  • Halls, L. K., and W. B. Homesley. 1966. Stand composition in a mature pine-hardwood forest of southeastern Texas. Journal of Forestry 64:170-174.
  • Hoagland, B. W. 1998a. Classification of Oklahoma vegetation types. Working draft. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory, Norman. 43 pp.
  • Johnson, F. L. 1986a. Oak-hickory savannahs and transition zones: Preservation status and management problems. Pages 345-347 in: D. L. Kulhavy, and R. N. Conner. Wilderness and natural areas in the eastern United States: A management challenge. Center for Applied Studies, School of Forestry, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX.
  • Kennedy, R. K. 1973. An analysis of selected Oklahoma upland forest stands including both overstory and understory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
  • Martin, D. L., and L. M. Smith. 1991. A survey and description of the natural plant communities of the Kisatchie National Forest, Winn and Kisatchie districts. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA. 372 pp.
  • Martin, D. L., and L. M. Smith. 1993. A survey and description of the natural plant communities of the Kisatchie National Forest, Evangeline and Catahoula districts. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge. 274 pp.
  • Rice, E. L., and W. T. Penfound. 1959. The upland forests of Oklahoma. Ecology 40:593-608.
  • Turner, R. L., J. E. Van Kley, L. S. Smith, and R. E. Evans. 1999. Ecological classification system for the national forests and adjacent areas of the West Gulf Coastal Plain. The Nature Conservancy, Nacogdoches, TX. 95 pp. plus appendices.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1990. Establishment record for Dismal Hollow Research Natural Area within Ozark National Forest, Newton County, Arkansas. Unpublished document. USDA Forest Service, Ozark National Forest, Russellville, AR. 20 pp. plus map.