Print Report

A0165 Picea pungens Southern Rocky Mountain Mesic Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: Forests included in this alliance are characterized by the dominance of Picea pungens in the forest canopy. Populus tremuloides may codominate on some sites. This forest alliance occurs at middle elevations (1800-3300 m) of the central and southern Rocky Mountains, usually in moist, concave topographic positions.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Blue Spruce Southern Rocky Mountain Mesic Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Southern Rocky Mountain Mesic Blue Spruce Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: Forests included in this alliance are characterized by the dominance of Picea pungens in the forest canopy. Populus tremuloides may codominate on some sites. Other conifers are usually present in these stands and may include Abies concolor, Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus strobiformis, and Pseudotsuga menziesii. The shrub layer is usually of only moderate cover and dominated by ericaceous or cold-deciduous species, with the latter group increasing with soil moisture or proximity to watercourses. Common species include Amelanchier alnifolia, Acer glabrum, Juniperus communis, Lonicera involucrata, Quercus gambelii, and Rubus parviflorus. Due to favorable soil moisture, the herbaceous layer is usually a diverse mixture of forbs and graminoids that may include Achillea millefolium, Arnica cordifolia, Carex siccata, Erigeron eximius, Festuca arizonica, Fragaria virginiana, Linnaea borealis, Packera cardamine, and Pseudoroegneria spicata. This forest alliance occurs at middle elevations (1800-3300 m) of the central and southern Rocky Mountains, usually in moist, concave topographic positions. Soils are variable, but usually young and derived from glacial or alluvially deposited materials. Stands often occupy sites that are protected from extreme sun and wind within Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii montane forests. North aspects are most common.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Diagnostic of this alliance is the dominance of Picea pungens in the moderately closed to closed tree canopy on sites that are not flooded during the growing season. Early-seral stands may be codominated by Populus tremuloides. Understory cover is moderate.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: These forests are of low to medium stature (10-25 m) and are dominated by needle-leaved evergreen trees. Cold-deciduous trees are often mixed in these stands, especially in recently disturbed areas. These communities often have sclerophyllous or cold-deciduous shrub layers of moderate cover (10-30%). The herbaceous layer is usually well-developed, and dominated by mesophytic forbs and graminoids less than 1 m in height.

Floristics: These forests are characterized by the dominance of Picea pungens in the forest canopy and usually represent a mesic phase of the mixed conifer forests of the southern Rocky Mountains and Colorado Plateau. Early-seral stands may be codominated by Populus tremuloides. Other conifers are usually present in these stands, depending upon geographic location, site moisture, and stand history. Common associates include Abies concolor, Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus strobiformis, and Pseudotsuga menziesii. The shrub layer is usually of only moderate cover and dominated by ericaceous or cold-deciduous species, with the latter group increasing with soil moisture or proximity to watercourses. Common species include Acer glabrum, Amelanchier alnifolia, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Cornus sericea, Juniperus communis, Mahonia repens, Quercus gambelii, Ribes inerme, Rosa woodsii, Rubus parviflorus, and Symphoricarpos rotundifolius. Due to favorable soil moisture, the herbaceous layer is usually a diverse mixture of forbs and graminoids and may include and Achillea millefolium, Arnica cordifolia, Carex siccata (= Carex foenea), Erigeron eximius, Festuca arizonica, Fragaria virginiana, Linnaea borealis, Packera cardamine (= Senecio cardamine), and Pseudoroegneria spicata.

Dynamics:  Picea pungens is a slow-growing, long-lived tree which regenerates from seed (Burns and Honkala 1990a). Seedlings are shallow-rooted and require perennially moist soils for establishment and optimal growth. Picea pungens is intermediate in shade tolerance, being somewhat more tolerant than Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii, and less tolerant than Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii. It forms late-seral stands in the subhumid regions of the southern Rocky Mountains. It is common for these forests to be heavily disturbed by grazing or fire. Stems of Populus tremuloides are thin-barked and readily killed by fire. It is a fire-adapted species that generally needs fire or some other stand-replacing disturbance to establish and maintain dominance in a forest. These mixed forests are seral and in the absence of stand-replacing disturbance such as fire will slowly convert to a Picea pungens-dominated climax forest (Mueggler 1988). Most of the stands sampled by Mueggler (1988) had a history of livestock grazing as evidenced by relative abundance of the exotic plants Taraxacum officinale and Poa pratensis and the scarcity of grazing-susceptible plants (Mueggler 1988).

Environmental Description:  These forests occur at middle elevations (1800-3300 m) of the central and southern Rocky Mountains, usually in moist, concave topographic positions. Precipitation averages 46-60 cm annually with the majority falling as growing-season rainfall. The temperature regime is continental and winters are moderately severe. Soils are variable, but usually young and derived from glacial or alluvially deposited materials. The pH is neutral to slightly alkaline. Youngblood and Mauk (1985) suggest a preference by these forests for non-igneous parent materials. These communities often occupy sites that are protected from extreme sun and wind within Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii montane forests. These forests are typically most common on north-facing slopes, which can be gentle to steep.

Geographic Range: These forests have been reported from the central and southern Rocky Mountains and higher elevations of the Colorado Plateau in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, NM, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.165, A423.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Picea pungens Series (Alexander et al. 1984b)
>< Aspen: 217 (Eyre 1980)
>< Blue Spruce: 216 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): D. Sarr and K.A. Schulz, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-14-14

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., F. Ronco, Jr., A. S. White, and J. A. Ludwig. 1984b. Douglas-fir habitat types of northern Arizona. General Technical Report RM-108. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 13 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Mueggler, W. F. 1988. Aspen community types of the Intermountain Region. General Technical Report INT-250. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.