Print Report

A2058 Acer rubrum - Nyssa sylvatica Swamp Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance covers nutrient-poor deciduous forested swamps and "basin swamps" characterized by Nyssa sylvatica, of the northeastern United States ranging from southern Vermont to the Coastal Plain of Virginia.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Maple - Blackgum Swamp Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Red Maple - Blackgum Coastal Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: Forests in this alliance have variable canopy composition, but typical canopy species across the range of this alliance include Acer rubrum var. trilobum and Nyssa sylvatica; associated trees in the northern portion of the range may include Picea rubens, Betula alleghaniensis, Tsuga canadensis, and Pinus strobus. Liquidambar styraciflua and Magnolia virginiana are characteristic in the southern portions of the range. These forests are nutrient-poor and generally acidic, and occur in basins and seepage areas. The alliance ranges from southern Vermont to the northern Coastal Plain of Virginia.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Swamps of poorly drained topographic basins characterized by Nyssa sylvatica in addition to Acer rubrum. Nutrient regime is oligotrophic, with sphagnum peat forming the substrate.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Although Nyssa sylvatica may also occur in other more eutrophic swamps, it is characteristic of this alliance and often occurs in abundance.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This is a deciduous swamp forest, with scattered conifers in some occurrences at the northern range limit. Conifers are all but lacking in the southern and central portions of the range. The shrub layer is usually well-developed, and the herbaceous layer is of variable cover. There is usually pronounced hummock-and-hollow microtopography and pools of standing water. Substrate is usually peat overlying mineral soils.

Floristics: Forests in this alliance have variable canopy composition, but typical canopy species across the range of this alliance include Acer rubrum var. trilobum and Nyssa sylvatica; associated trees in the northern portion of the range may include Picea rubens, Betula alleghaniensis, Tsuga canadensis, and Pinus strobus. Liquidambar styraciflua and Magnolia virginiana are characteristic in the southern portions of the range. Understory and shrub species include Clethra alnifolia, Ilex verticillata, Lindera benzoin, Ilex mucronata (= Nemopanthus mucronatus), Rhododendron viscosum, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides. Characteristic herbaceous species are Carex folliculata, Carex intumescens, Coptis trifolia, Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmunda regalis, and Symplocarpus foetidus. Sphagnum spp. are typical.

Dynamics:  Groundwater is the primary water source, with minimal overland flow, limiting nutrient inputs. The peaty substrate is usually saturated, contributing to frequent treefalls with canopy openings.

Environmental Description:  These wetland forests include forested acidic seeps on hillsides or streamheads, and in poorly drained depressions. Hummock-and-hollow microtopography is usually evident, with pools of standing water present in the spring. These wetland forests occur where surface water is seldom present, but the substrate is saturated to the surface for extended periods during the growing season, and include forested acidic seeps on hillsides or streamheads, and other poorly drained depressions. Individual occurrences of these forests tend to be small in extent and can provide habitat for rare plant species.

Geographic Range: This alliance ranges from New England south to the Coastal Plain of Virginia.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This represents a split of A.348; AL, AR, GA, IL?, NC, OK, SC, TN removed from original distribution (LAS 2-12).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Red Maple - Black Gum Swamp (Undifferentiated) Alliance (AN) (Windisch 2014a)

Concept Author(s): H.W. Vogelmann (1976)

Author of Description: L.A. Sneddon

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-08-14

  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Conard, H. S. 1935. The plant associations of central Long Island. The American Midland Naturalist 16:433-516.
  • Damman, A. W. H., and B. Kershner. 1977. Floristic composition and topographical distribution of the forest communities of the gneiss areas of western Connecticut. Naturaliste Canadien 104:23-45.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2002. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Eichelberger, B. 2011i. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Red Maple - Black-gum Palustrine Forest Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16023] (accessed January 31, 2012)
  • Eichelberger, B. 2011o. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Red Maple - Magnolia Palustrine Forest Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16024] (accessed February 15, 2012)
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Hanks, J. P. 1985. Plant communities and ground-water levels in southern Nassau County, Long Island, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112:79-86.
  • Harvill, A. M., Jr. 1967. The vegetation of Assateague Island, Virginia. Castanea 32:105-108.
  • Heckscher, S. 1994. The vegetation of the Glades Region, Cumberland County, New Jersey. Bartonia 58:101-113.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Robichaud, B., and M. F. Buell. 1973. Vegetation of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 340 pp.
  • Smith, T. L. 1991. Natural ecological communities of Pennsylvania. First revision. Unpublished report. Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, PA. 111 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2001. Classification of natural communities of Massachusetts. September 2001 draft. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA.
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2000. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.
  • Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1985a. Wetlands of Delaware. Cooperative publication of USDI Fish & Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Newton Corner, MA, and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, DE. 77 pp.
  • Vogelmann, H. W. 1969. Vermont natural areas. Report 2. Central Office and Interagency Committee on Natural Resources. State Office Building, Montpelier, VT.
  • Vogelmann, H. W. 1976. An unusual black gum swamp in Maine. Rhodora 78:326-327.
  • Windisch, A .G. 2014a. Pinelands ecological communities and higher level groups with crosswalk / proposed 2008 revisions to NVC. November 16, 2014 draft. New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Trenton.