Print Report

M036 Interior Warm & Cool Desert Riparian Forest Macrogroup

Type Concept Sentence: This macrogroup covers warm and cold climate riparian and wetland forested vegetation of the southwestern deserts and western interior U.S., including the Tamaulipan area of southern Texas. Some of the dominant trees species of this highly diverse macrogroup include Vachellia farnesiana, Celtis laevigata, Ebenopsis ebano, Juglans major, Platanus racemosa, Platanus wrightii, Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni, Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera, Populus fremontii, Prosopis glandulosa, Salix laevigata, and Salix gooddingii. This macrogroup also includes oases dominated by evergreen palms Washingtonia filifera or Sabal mexicana.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Interior Warm & Cool Desert Riparian Forest Macrogroup

Colloquial Name: Interior Warm & Cool Desert Riparian Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Macrogroup

Type Concept: This macrogroup is of riparian, floodplain, seep and oases dominated by trees. Dominant include Vachellia farnesiana, Acer negundo, Celtis laevigata, Celtis ehrenbergiana, Cordia boissieri, Diospyros texana, Ebenopsis ebano, Ehretia anacua, Fraxinus velutina, Haematoxylum brasiletto, Juglans major, Leucaena pulverulenta, Parkinsonia aculeata, Platanus racemosa, Platanus wrightii, Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni, Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera, Populus fremontii, Prosopis glandulosa, Quercus lobata, Sabal mexicana, Salix amygdaloides, Salix gooddingii, Salix laevigata, Sapindus saponaria, Sideroxylon celastrinum, Tecoma stans, Ulmus crassifolia, and Washingtonia filifera. It occurs from sea level to 2300 m (7500 feet) along foothill and mountain canyons and valleys where riparian corridors follow stream courses and spring-fed depressions along canyon waterways and tectonic faultlines. Most of the dominant woody species found in this macrogroup are phreatophytes and require the presence of a seasonally shallow water table. This macrogroup occurs from Central Valley of California south and east through the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts to the Rio Grande River, north into valleys of the lower Colorado Plateau, the San Luis Valley of Colorado and east into the western Great Plains and the Tamaulipan region of southern Texas. The Tamaulipan area is floristically variable with some components better classified with subtropical vegetation and others with temperate vegetation, so it is a transitional zone and is included within this macrogroup because of shared habitat, dynamics, physiognomic structure and tree genera.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Diagnostic tree species trees include Cordia boissieri, Diospyros texana, Ebenopsis ebano, Ehretia anacua, Juglans major, Leucaena pulverulenta, Parkinsonia aculeata, Platanus racemosa, Platanus wrightii, Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni, Populus fremontii, Sabal mexicana, Salix laevigata, Ulmus crassifolia, and Washingtonia filifera.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Currently within the NVC there are no subtropical groups, so for the present time this warm-climate riparian macrogroup appears to be the best placement of ~Tamaulipan Riparian Scrub Forest Group (G549)$$. G549 is related to ~Warm Desert Lowland Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup (M076)$$ (J. Evens pers. comm. 2014). In addition, the Tamaulipan area is floristically variable with some components better classified with subtropical vegetation and others with temperate vegetation, so it is a transitional zone. These groups share common habitat, dynamics, physiognomy, and tree genera and all three include endemic palm species. This macrogroup was expanded to include the cool desert range of Populus fremontii in Nevada and Utah as well as part of the range of Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera that occurs within the interior west and western edge of the Great Plains, skirting around the southern Rocky Mountains, but not into the Great Plains proper.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Open to closed forests of tall and scrubby-height cold-deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen trees, often occurring in multiple layers.

Floristics: The vegetation is primarily treed with varying height and canopy closure. Dominant tree species include Vachellia farnesiana (= Acacia farnesiana), Acer macrophyllum, Acer negundo, Alnus rhombifolia, Alnus rubra, Celtis laevigata var. reticulata, Celtis ehrenbergiana (= Celtis pallida), Cephalanthus occidentalis, Cordia boissieri, Diospyros texana, Ebenopsis ebano, Ehretia anacua, Fraxinus velutina, Haematoxylum brasiletto, Juglans major, Leucaena pulverulenta, Parkinsonia aculeata, Platanus racemosa, Platanus wrightii, Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni, Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera, Populus fremontii, Prosopis glandulosa, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Quercus agrifolia, Quercus lobata, Sabal mexicana, Salix gooddingii, Salix laevigata, Salix nigra, Sapindus saponaria, Taxodium mucronatum, Tecoma stans, Ulmus crassifolia, and Washingtonia filifera. Floristic information was compiled from Brown (1982a), Barbour and Major (1988), MacMahon (1988), Szaro (1989), Dick-Peddie (1993), Holland and Keil (1995), Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf (1995), Muldavin et al. (2000a), Barbour et al. (2007), and Sawyer et al. (2009).

Dynamics:  Vegetation is dependent upon at least temporary annual rise in the water table with annual or periodic flooding and associated sediment scour for growth and reproduction (especially for cottonwood and willow species). Permanent subsurface water is required to maintain many of the dominant phreatophytic species and the palm species (Washingtonia filifera and Sabal mexicana). Palm groves were once common in the lower Rio Grande Valley 130 km (80 miles) from the Gulf of Mexico, but have since largely been converted to agriculture (Clover 1937, Everitt et al. 1996a, Tremblay et al. 2005).

Environmental Description:  This macrogroup consists of riparian corridors along perennial, intermittent and temporarily flooded streams, and arroyos (ramaderos). Stands may occur on isolated springs as well as within-channel spring-fed depressions. Soils are typically coarse alluvial to loam, silt loam or clay loam and are usually somewhat deeper than soils of the surrounding landscape; and some stands occur on serpentine soils. Elevation ranges from sea level up to 2300 m (7500 feet). Environmental information was compiled from several sources: Brown (1982a), Barbour and Major (1988), Barbour et al. (2007), MacMahon (1988), Szaro (1989), Dick-Peddie (1993), Holland and Keil (1995), Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf (1995), Muldavin et al. (2000a), and Sawyer et al. (2009).

Geographic Range: This macrogroup occurs from Oregon''s southern Coast Ranges, California''s Central Valley, the foothills of the Sierra Nevada east into the Sonoran, Mojave, western Great Plains and Tamaulipan regions of Texas and Mexico.

Nations: MX,US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CA, CO, MXBCN, MXBCS, MXCHH, MXCOA, MXNLE, MXSON, MXTAM, NM, NV, OR, TX, UT




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < California Riparian Deciduous Forests and Woodland - 223.3 (Brown et al. 1998)
< Sonoran Riparian Oasis Forest - 224.4 (Brown et al. 1998)
< Southwestern Riparian Deciduous Forests and Woodland - 223.2 (Brown et al. 1998)
< Tamaulipan Interior Swamp and Riparian Forest - 224.3 (Brown et al. 1998)

Concept Author(s): Faber-Langendoen et al. (2014)

Author of Description: G. Kittel, P. Comer, T. Keeler-Wolf, J. Teague

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-11-15

  • Barbour, M. G., T. Keeler-Wolf, and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. 2007a. Terrestrial vegetation of California, third edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Barbour, M. G., and J. Major, editors. 1988. Terrestrial vegetation of California: New expanded edition. California Native Plant Society, Special Publication 9, Sacramento. 1030 pp.
  • Bray, W. L. 1901. The ecological relations of the vegetation of western Texas. Botanical Gazette 32:102.
  • Brown, D. E., F. Reichenbacher, and S. E. Franson. 1998. A classification of North American biotic communities. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 141 pp.
  • Brown, D. E., editor. 1982a. Biotic communities of the American Southwest-United States and Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 4(1-4):1-342.
  • Clover, E. U. 1937. Vegetational survey of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Madrono 4:41-55, 77-100.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1998. An old-growth definition for southwestern subtropical upland forests. General Technical Report SRS-21. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC. 7 pp.
  • Dick-Peddie, W. A. 1993. New Mexico vegetation: Past, present, and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 244 pp.
  • Everitt, J. H., F. W. Judd, D. E. Escobar, M. A. Alaniz, M. R. Davis, and W. MacWhorter. 1996a. Using remote sensing and spatial information technologies to map sabal palm in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 41(3):218-226.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Holland, V. L., and D. J. Keil. 1995. California vegetation. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 516 pp.
  • Jahrsdoerfer, S. E., and D. M. Leslie. 1988. Tamaulipan brushland of the lower Rio Grande Valley of south Texas: Description, human impacts, and management options. USDI Fish & Wildlife Service. Biological Report 88(36). 63 pp.
  • MacMahon, J. A. 1988. Warm deserts. Pages 232-264 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Muldavin, E., P. Durkin, M. Bradley, M. Stuever, and P. Mehlhop. 2000a. Handbook of wetland vegetation communities of New Mexico. Volume I: Classification and community descriptions. Final report to the New Mexico Environment Department and the Environmental Protection Agency prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 471 pp.
  • Shiflet, T. N., editor. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Society for Range Management. Denver, CO. 152 pp.
  • Stout, D., J. Buck-Diaz, S. Taylor, and J. M. Evens. 2013. Vegetation mapping and accuracy assessment report for Carrizo Plain National Monument. California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program, Sacramento, CA. 71 pp.
  • Szaro, R. C. 1989. Riparian forest and scrubland community types of Arizona and New Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 9(3-4):70-139.
  • Thomas, K. A., T. Keeler-Wolf, J. Franklin, and P. Stine. 2004. Mojave Desert Ecosystem Program: Central Mojave vegetation mapping database. U.S. Geological Survey, Western Regional Science Center. 251 pp.
  • Tremblay, T. A., W. A. White, and J. A. Raney. 2005. Native woodland loss during the mid-1900s in Cameron County, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 50(4):479-482.
  • Vogl, R. J., and L. T. McHargue. 1966. Vegetation of California fan palm oases on the San Andreas fault. Ecology 47:532-540.