Print Report
CEGL007006 Liquidambar styraciflua - Quercus (phellos, nigra, alba) / Carpinus caroliniana Floodplain Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sweetgum - (Willow Oak, Water Oak, White Oak) / American Hornbeam Floodplain Forest
Colloquial Name: Piedmont High Bottomland Forest
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: These forests occur along medium, and possibly large, Piedmont rivers, on floodplains or terraces that are elevated several meters above the river. They occur on sites that are higher above the river, less frequently flooded, and better drained than other floodplain communities. They are dominated primarily by bottomland hardwood species, but usually have a significant component of upland species present as well. Liquidambar styraciflua, Quercus phellos, Quercus michauxii, Quercus nigra, Quercus pagoda, and Acer floridanum predominate, but Quercus alba, Carya ovata, Carya cordiformis, Carya tomentosa, Quercus shumardii, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Fagus grandifolia are also fairly common. Occasionally, species shared with levee forests, such as Platanus occidentalis or Celtis laevigata, may be present. Carpinus caroliniana is the most abundant understory tree. Other high constancy understory species include Ilex opaca, Ulmus alata, Acer floridanum, Juniperus virginiana, and Asimina triloba. Ilex decidua is the most constant native shrub, but invasive exotic Ligustrum sinense is also usually present. Other common shrubs include Lindera benzoin, Aesculus sylvatica, and Asimina triloba. Frequent herbaceous species include Chasmanthium latifolium, Mitchella repens, Polystichum acrostichoides, and Verbesina alternifolia. Microstegium vimineum (exotic) also occurs with high frequency. Other herbs include both species typical of floodplains, such as Boehmeria cylindrica, Carex debilis, Carex grayi, and Carex intumescens, as well as more typical upland species such as Dichanthelium commutatum and Danthonia spicata.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Stands can be distinguished from ~Quercus pagoda - Quercus phellos - Quercus lyrata - Quercus michauxii / Chasmanthium latifolium Swamp Forest (CEGL007356)$$ by having a larger component of upland species. Quercus nigra seems to be particularly important in these communities. The analysis in Matthews et al. (2010) found a few plots from small creeks grouping with the cluster that represents this association, but this association is best regarded as a community of medium and larger rivers. Forests of smaller floodplains, represented by ~Liquidambar styraciflua - Liriodendron tulipifera / Lindera benzoin / Arisaema triphyllum Floodplain Forest (CEGL004418)$$, also may have abundant Liquidambar and have abundant upland species. They usually lack bottomland oaks and are more likely to have Quercus alba or Quercus rubra. This association is represented in the Virginia plots database by 22 plots, which have been analyzed in a statewide dataset of Piedmont and inner Coastal Plain floodplain forests.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: In North Carolina, these forests are dominated primarily by bottomland hardwood species, but usually have a significant component of upland species present as well. The most constant abundant canopy species are Liquidambar styraciflua, Quercus phellos, Quercus nigra, Quercus pagoda, Quercus michauxii, and Acer floridanum (= Acer barbatum). Quercus alba was present in 68% of the sampled plots (Matthews 2011). Carya ovata, Carya cordiformis, Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Quercus shumardii, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Fagus grandifolia are also fairly common. Occasionally, species shared with levee forests, such as Platanus occidentalis or Celtis laevigata, may be present. Carpinus caroliniana is the most abundant understory tree. Other high constancy understory species include Ilex opaca, Ulmus alata, Acer floridanum, Juniperus virginiana, and Asimina triloba. Ilex decidua is the most constant native shrub, but invasive exotic Ligustrum sinense is also usually present. Other common shrubs include Lindera benzoin, Aesculus sylvatica, and Asimina triloba. Frequent herbaceous species include Chasmanthium latifolium, Mitchella repens, Polystichum acrostichoides, and Verbesina alternifolia. Microstegium vimineum (exotic) also occurs with high frequency. Other herbs include both species typical of floodplains, such as Boehmeria cylindrica, Carex debilis, Carex grayi, and Carex intumescens, as well as more typical upland species such as Dichanthelium commutatum and Danthonia spicata.
Composition differs somewhat in the Virginia examples of the association. Quercus nigra is absent and southern species such as Acer floridanum that reach their northern limits in Virginia are not as frequent. Liquidambar styraciflua and Carya cordiformis are the most constant canopy trees. One or more oaks are also usually important, especially in older and less-disturbed stands. The most frequent oaks are Quercus phellos, Quercus michauxii, and Quercus shumardii, while Quercus pagoda and Quercus alba are only occasional. Liriodendron tulipifera and trees more typical of levees, such as Celtis occidentalis, Platanus occidentalis, Ulmus americana, and Fraxinus pennsylvanica, are frequently scattered but rarely important. However, these species tend to increase following disturbance and removal of oaks by cutting. Ulmus alata, Carpinus caroliniana, and Asimina triloba are constant understory trees, while Acer floridanum may also be common within its southern Virginia range. Ilex decidua, Lindera benzoin, and Viburnum prunifolium are the most constant shrubs. The herb flora is similar to that described for North Carolina. Occasionally, there may be a prominent component of nutrient-demanding forbs such as Asarum canadense on the richer sites. A distinct variant of this association occurs at a small number of sites along the Dan, Roanoke, Meherrin, and Nottoway rivers in Virginia. The soils at these sites have exceptionally high calcium and pH values, and the forests are more dominated by Acer floridanum, Carya cordiformis, Aesculus sylvatica, and a suite of rich-site herbs that includes Trillium sessile, Enemion biternatum, Phacelia covillei, Nemophila aphylla, and others. However, other than the relatively greater abundance of nutrient-demanding species, the floristic composition of these stands is very similar to that of more typical stands of the association. Several of the rich stands are quite old, and it is also possible that tolerant trees such as Acer floridanum have simply become more prevalent with maturity.
Composition differs somewhat in the Virginia examples of the association. Quercus nigra is absent and southern species such as Acer floridanum that reach their northern limits in Virginia are not as frequent. Liquidambar styraciflua and Carya cordiformis are the most constant canopy trees. One or more oaks are also usually important, especially in older and less-disturbed stands. The most frequent oaks are Quercus phellos, Quercus michauxii, and Quercus shumardii, while Quercus pagoda and Quercus alba are only occasional. Liriodendron tulipifera and trees more typical of levees, such as Celtis occidentalis, Platanus occidentalis, Ulmus americana, and Fraxinus pennsylvanica, are frequently scattered but rarely important. However, these species tend to increase following disturbance and removal of oaks by cutting. Ulmus alata, Carpinus caroliniana, and Asimina triloba are constant understory trees, while Acer floridanum may also be common within its southern Virginia range. Ilex decidua, Lindera benzoin, and Viburnum prunifolium are the most constant shrubs. The herb flora is similar to that described for North Carolina. Occasionally, there may be a prominent component of nutrient-demanding forbs such as Asarum canadense on the richer sites. A distinct variant of this association occurs at a small number of sites along the Dan, Roanoke, Meherrin, and Nottoway rivers in Virginia. The soils at these sites have exceptionally high calcium and pH values, and the forests are more dominated by Acer floridanum, Carya cordiformis, Aesculus sylvatica, and a suite of rich-site herbs that includes Trillium sessile, Enemion biternatum, Phacelia covillei, Nemophila aphylla, and others. However, other than the relatively greater abundance of nutrient-demanding species, the floristic composition of these stands is very similar to that of more typical stands of the association. Several of the rich stands are quite old, and it is also possible that tolerant trees such as Acer floridanum have simply become more prevalent with maturity.
Dynamics: These communities are flooded for only short periods and likely only in the largest floods. The presence of upland trees suggests fairly well-drained soils, but the predominance of bottomland species suggests that flooding and alluvial soils are important. Microtopography may create small wet inclusions. Canopy dynamics are presumably driven mainly by gap formation.
Environmental Description: These forests occur along medium to large Piedmont rivers, on floodplains or terraces that are elevated several meters above the river. They occur on sites that are higher above the river, less frequently flooded, and better drained than ~Quercus pagoda - Quercus phellos - Quercus lyrata - Quercus michauxii / Chasmanthium latifolium Swamp Forest (CEGL007356)$$. Matthews (2011) found them primarily on medium-sized rivers. Comparable large river sites exist, but few have natural vegetation; this association may occur on them as well. In Virginia, this type is almost exclusively found along medium-sized rivers, since most suitable large-river sites are cleared or in recovery from clearing.
Geographic Range: This association is found in the Piedmont of North Carolina and the central and southern Piedmont of Virginia. It extends into the extreme Inner Coastal Plain of southeastern Virginia, at a few sites along the Meherrin and Nottoway rivers with exceptionally rich soils. It is likely to occur in South Carolina and Georgia
Nations: US
States/Provinces: GA?, NC, SC?, VA
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.859986
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3G4
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation | F026 | 1.B.3 |
Division | 1.B.3.Nb Southeastern North American Flooded & Swamp Forest Division | D062 | 1.B.3.Nb |
Macrogroup | 1.B.3.Nb.4 Swamp Chestnut Oak - Bald-cypress - Pecan Southern Floodplain Forest Macrogroup | M031 | 1.B.3.Nb.4 |
Group | 1.B.3.Nb.4.a Swamp Chestnut Oak - Laurel Oak - Sweetgum Floodplain Forest Group | G034 | 1.B.3.Nb.4.a |
Alliance | A3633 Willow Oak Piedmont Floodplain Forest Alliance | A3633 | 1.B.3.Nb.4.a |
Association | CEGL007006 Sweetgum - (Willow Oak, Water Oak, White Oak) / American Hornbeam Floodplain Forest | CEGL007006 | 1.B.3.Nb.4.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Oak-Hickory Flats (group 2) (Matthews et al. 2011)
- Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
- Matthews, E. R., R. K. Peet, and A. S. Weakley. 2011. Classification and description of alluvial plant communities of the Piedmont region, North Carolina, U.S.A. Applied Vegetation Science 14:485-505.
- Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
- Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
- Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
- Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.