Print Report

G211 Abies grandis - Pseudotsuga menziesii - Larix occidentalis Central Rocky Mountain Forest Group

Type Concept Sentence: This group includes woodlands of the central Rocky Mountains dominated by the deciduous conifer Larix occidentalis, in places where frequent fires maintain open woodlands, usually with abundant undergrowth dominated by low-growing shrubs and graminoids.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Grand Fir - Douglas-fir - Western Larch Central Rocky Mountain Forest Group

Colloquial Name: Central Rocky Mountain Mesic Grand Fir - Douglas-fir Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This group also includes woodlands or "savannas" of the deciduous conifer Larix occidentalis; these were typically stands initiated following stand-replacing crown fires of other conifer forests, but are maintained by a higher frequency, surface-fire regime. Fire suppression has led to invasion of the more shade-tolerant tree species Abies grandis, Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, or Tsuga spp. and loss of much of the single-story canopy woodlands. Larix occidentalis communities occur in settings where low-intensity, high-frequency fires create open larch woodlands, often with the undergrowth dominated by low-growing Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Cornus canadensis, Calamagrostis rubescens, Linnaea borealis, Spiraea betulifolia, Vaccinium cespitosum, and/or Xerophyllum tenax. Less frequent or absence of fire creates mixed-dominance stands with often shrubby undergrowth; Vaccinium cespitosum is common, and taller shrubs can include Acer glabrum, Ceanothus velutinus, Shepherdia canadensis, Holodiscus discolor, Physocarpus malvaceus, Rubus parviflorus, or Vaccinium membranaceum.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Mesic conifer forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, where Abies grandis, Pseudotsuga menziesii, or Larix occidentalis are the major dominants.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This group should be considered for merging with ~East Cascades Mesic Grand Fir - Douglas-fir Forest Group (G212)$$; they share a number of floristic similarities, along with some differences. But perhaps those differences would be better handled as alliance-level distinctions. This needs review.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Mesic conifer forests, ranging from closed-canopy to more open "savanna-like" woodlands, over deciduous shrub layer, or forb-rich herbaceous layer.

Floristics: Abies grandis is dominant in these forests and Pseudotsuga menziesii commonly shares the canopy. Pinus monticola, Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Abies lasiocarpa, and Larix occidentalis are major associates. On most mesic sites, intermediate to older age stands of this forest group may support some Thuja plicata and Tsuga heterophylla in the overstory. Common shrubs include Paxistima myrsinites, Amelanchier alnifolia, Rosa gymnocarpa, Acer glabrum, Spiraea betulifolia, Symphoricarpos albus, Cornus canadensis, Rubus parviflorus, Menziesia ferruginea, Taxus brevifolia, and Vaccinium membranaceum. Composition of the herbaceous layer reflects local climate and degree of canopy closure; it is typically highly diverse in all but closed-canopy conditions. Clintonia uniflora, Linnaea borealis, Aralia nudicaulis, and Xerophyllum tenax are common forbs in these forests. Other forbs include Actaea rubra, Adenocaulon bicolor, Arnica latifolia, Galium triflorum, Goodyera oblongifolia, Orthilia secunda, Streptopus amplexifolius, Prosartes hookeri (= Disporum hookeri), Thalictrum occidentale, and Trillium ovatum. Asarum caudatum occurs in the Kootenai and Yak river areas of extreme northwestern Montana, north-central Idaho and in the Blue Mountains in Oregon. Graminoids usually form a very minor component and typically include Bromus vulgaris and minor amounts of Carex geyeri, Elymus glaucus, Festuca subulata, and Oryzopsis asperifolia. This group also includes woodlands or "savannas" of the deciduous conifer Larix occidentalis. Important low-growing shrubs include Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Spiraea betulifolia, and Vaccinium cespitosum; taller shrubs can include Acer glabrum, Ceanothus velutinus, Shepherdia canadensis, Physocarpus malvaceus, Rubus parviflorus, or Vaccinium membranaceum. Herbaceous species include Calamagrostis rubescens, Clintonia uniflora, Linnaea borealis, or Xerophyllum tenax.

Dynamics:  Typically, stand-replacement fires have 150- to 500-year return intervals, with moderate-severity fire intervals of 50-100 years. Abies grandis forests include many sites dominated by Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa which were formerly maintained by wildfire, and may now be dominated by Abies grandis (a fire-sensitive, shade-tolerant species) due to fire exclusion (Lillybridge et al. 1995, Chappell et al. 1997). Pre-European settlement fire regimes were typically of frequent, low-intensity surface fires, maintaining relatively open stands of a mix of fire-resistant species. With the advent of effective fire suppression, longer fire-return intervals are now the rule, and mixed-stature stands with Abies grandis in various size classes now create ladder fuels making these forests more susceptible to high-intensity, stand-replacing fires (Cooper et al. 1987, Lillybridge et al. 1995).

Larix occidentalis is a long-lived species (in excess of 700 years in the northern Rocky Mountains), and thus stands of western larch are themselves persistent. However, the life of Larix-dominated stands probably rarely exceeds 250 years due to various mortality sources and the in-growth of shade-tolerant species, especially on mesic sites. Occurrences of Larix occidentalis stands are generated by stand-replacing fire, the fire-return interval for which is speculated to be approximately 80 to 200 years (Cooper et al. 1987). These sites may be maintained in a seral status for hundreds of years since Larix occidentalis is a long-lived species and the understory is often dominated by Pseudotsuga, which will grow into the upper canopy. The potential dominants, typically Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, and/or Abies grandis or rarely Tsuga heterophylla or Thuja plicata, establish and grow on these sites, presenting the distinct probability, given the fire-return intervals for this type, that the "climax" (long-term stable) condition is never attained. It has been noted in northern Idaho that, following disturbance (particularly logging) in some mesic-site occurrences, Larix occidentalis does not necessarily replace itself, the first tree-dominated successional stages being dominated by Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus contorta, or less frequently by more shade-tolerant species (Cooper et al. 1987); this response is a consequence of the episodic nature of favorable cone crop years in Larix occidentalis.

Environmental Description:  These forests occur in areas influenced by incursions of mild, wet, Pacific maritime air masses. Much of the annual precipitation occurs as rain, but where snow does occur, it is generally melted by rain during warm winter storms. Elevations range from 610 to 2195 m (2000-7200 feet). Occurrences generally are found on all slopes and aspects but grow best on sites with high soil moisture, such as valley bottoms, on benches, well-drained slopes and moist ravines. Sites supporting these forests are typically warmer and moister than the prevailing local climate. However, these are moist, non-flooded or upland sites. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Parent materials are non-calcareous materials, predominately sedimentary rock and argillite. Intermittent shallow A horizons overlying a dominant B horizon indicate that volcanic ash and loess deposits have significant contribution to soil development. These forests occur on gravelly loams and silt loams are slightly acidic.

Geographic Range: This group occurs in the Northern Rockies of western Montana west into north-central Idaho, the Blue Mountains in Oregon, northeastern Washington and possibly southern British Columbia. Larix occidentalis extends beyond the typical range of this group in north-central Washington and a short distance in southern British Columbia and then jumps to the Wenatchee Mountains and south along the eastern Cascades to the Columbia River.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, BC?, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Grand Fir: 213 (Eyre 1980) [Grand fir stands are an important component of this group.]
< Western Larch: 212 (Eyre 1980)
>< Western White Pine: 215 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): R.F. Daubenmire and J.B. Daubenmire (1968)

Author of Description: M.S. Reid, R. Crawford and M. Manning

Acknowledgements: R. Crawford and M. Manning

Version Date: 05-30-13

  • Agee, J. K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, DC. 493 pp.
  • Chappell, C., R. Crawford, J. Kagan, and P. J. Doran. 1997. A vegetation, land use, and habitat classification system for the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of Oregon and Washington. Unpublished report prepared for Wildlife habitat and species associations within Oregon and Washington landscapes: Building a common understanding for management. Prepared by Washington and Oregon Natural Heritage Programs, Olympia, WA, and Portland, OR. 177 pp.
  • Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  • Daubenmire, R. F., and J. B. Daubenmire. 1968. Forest vegetation of eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 60. 104 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Hessburg, P. F., B. G. Smith, R. B. Salter, R. D. Ottmar, and E. Alvarado. 2000. Recent changes (1930s-1990s) in spatial patterns of interior northwest forests, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 136(1-3):53-83.
  • Johnson, C. G., Jr., and S. A. Simon. 1987. Plant associations of the Wallowa-Snake Province Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Technical Paper R6-ECOL-TP-255A-86. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 399 pp. plus appendices.
  • Johnson, C. G., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1992. Plant associations of the Blue and Ochoco mountains. R6-ERW-TP-036-92. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 163 pp. plus appendices.
  • Leavell, D. 2000. Vegetation and process of the Kootenai National Forest. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula. 508 pp.
  • Lillybridge, T. R., B. L. Kovalchik, C. K. Williams, and B. G. Smith. 1995. Field guide for forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-359. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 335 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Williams, C. K., B. F. Kelly, B. G. Smith, and T. R. Lillybridge. 1995. Forest plant associations of the Colville National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-360. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 140 pp.