Print Report

G226 Abies concolor - Pseudotsuga menziesii Southern Rocky Mountain Dry Forest Group

Type Concept Sentence: This group consists of dry mixed-conifer forests of mainly Pseudotsuga menziesii and Abies concolor, although as many as seven conifers can be found growing in the same occurrence, and there are a number of cold-deciduous shrub, forb and graminoid species common. It occurs throughout the southern Rocky Mountains and Great Basin and east into Texas, and has a mixed-severity fire regime.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: White Fir - Douglas-fir Southern Rocky Mountain Dry Forest Group

Colloquial Name: Southern Rocky Mountain White Fir - Douglas-fir Dry Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This is a group of the southern Rocky Mountains and Great Basin. It occurs from Nevada extending east into the Trans-Pecos plateaus of Texas, south to the Chihuahuan Desert, and throughout the Four Corners region. These are mixed-conifer forests occurring on all aspects at elevations ranging from 1200 to 3300 m. The composition and structure of the overstory are dependent upon the temperature and moisture relationships of the site and the successional status of the occurrence. Pseudotsuga menziesii and Abies concolor are most frequent, but Pinus ponderosa may be present to codominant. Pinus flexilis is common in Nevada. Pseudotsuga menziesii forests occupy drier sites, and Pinus ponderosa is a common codominant. Abies concolor-dominated forests occupy cooler sites, such as upper slopes at higher elevations, canyon sideslopes, ridgetops, and north- and east-facing slopes which burn somewhat infrequently. Picea pungens is uncommon in this group but does occur in cool, moist locations, often as smaller patches within a matrix of other associations. As many as seven conifers can be found growing in the same occurrence, and there are a number of cold-deciduous shrub, forb and graminoid species common, including Juniperus communis, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Artemisia tridentata, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Mahonia repens, Paxistima myrsinites, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, Jamesia americana, Quercus gambelii, Galium triflorum, Muhlenbergia straminea, and Festuca arizonica. Forests in this group were undoubtedly characterized by a mixed-severity fire regime under "natural conditions," characterized by a high degree of variability in lethality and return interval.

Diagnostic Characteristics: The tree canopy is often dominated by the widespread Pseudotsuga menziesii, whereas Abies concolor is an indicator species that may be present to dominant in stands in the southern half of Colorado and northern New Mexico west into Arizona, Utah and Nevada. Diagnostic understory species are dry-mesic site indicators such as Arctostaphylos patula, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Arnica cordifolia, Carex rossii, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Cercocarpus montanus, Danthonia parryi, Festuca arizonica, Juniperus communis, Mahonia repens, Poa fendleriana, Physocarpus monogynus, Pseudoroegneria spicata, Quercus gambelii, Quercus x pauciloba, and Vaccinium myrtillus.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The transition between this group and ~Middle Rocky Mountain Montane Douglas-fir Forest & Woodland Group (G215)$$ in Wyoming needs to be further clarified, both in terms of floristics and distribution details. For now, it is assumed that this group does not occur in the Bighorn Range or in the Yellowstone region, but its occurrence in isolated ranges of central and western Wyoming is possible.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Mixed conifer-dominated woodlands and forests with shrub, grass or sparse understories. Occasionally broad-leaved deciduous trees are intermixed with the conifers in mesic environments.

Floristics: This highly variable ecological group comprises mixed-conifer forests at montane elevations throughout the Intermountain West region. Abies concolor dominates at higher, colder locations; Picea pungens represents mesic conditions; and Pseudotsuga menziesii dominates intermediate zones. As many as seven conifers can be found growing in the same occurrence, with the successful reproduction of the diagnostic species determining the association type. Common conifers include Pinus ponderosa, Pinus flexilis, Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, Juniperus scopulorum, and Picea engelmannii. Populus tremuloides is often present as intermingled individuals in remnant aspen clones or in adjacent patches. The composition and structure of the overstory are dependent upon the temperature and moisture relationships of the site and the successional status of the occurrence (DeVelice et al. 1986, Muldavin et al. 1996).

A number of cold-deciduous shrub and graminoid species are found in many occurrences (e.g., Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Mahonia repens, Paxistima myrsinites, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, Jamesia americana, Quercus gambelii, and Festuca arizonica). Other important species include Amelanchier alnifolia, Arctostaphylos patula, Holodiscus dumosus, Jamesia americana, Juniperus communis, Physocarpus monogynus, Quercus x pauciloba, Robinia neomexicana, Rubus parviflorus, and Vaccinium myrtillus. Where soil moisture is favorable, the herbaceous layer may be quite diverse, including graminoids Bromus ciliatus (= Bromus canadensis), Calamagrostis rubescens, Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Carex siccata (= Carex foenea), Festuca occidentalis, Koeleria macrantha, Muhlenbergia montana, Muhlenbergia straminea (= Muhlenbergia virescens), Poa fendleriana, Pseudoroegneria spicata, and forbs Achillea millefolium, Arnica cordifolia, Erigeron eximius, Fragaria virginiana, Linnaea borealis, Luzula parviflora, Osmorhiza berteroi, Packera cardamine (= Senecio cardamine), Thalictrum occidentale, Thalictrum fendleri, Thermopsis rhombifolia, Viola adunca, and species of many other genera, including Lathyrus, Penstemon, Lupinus, Vicia, Arenaria, Galium, and others.

Dynamics:  Forests in this group represent the gamut of fire tolerance. Formerly, Abies concolor in the Utah High Plateaus were restricted to rather moist or less fire-prone areas by frequent surface fires. These areas experienced mixed fire severities, with patches of crowning in which all trees were killed, intermingled with patches of underburn in which larger Abies concolor survived (Mauk and Henderson 1984, Zouhar 2001). With fire suppression, Abies concolor has vigorously colonized many sites formerly occupied by open Pinus ponderosa woodlands. These invasions have dramatically changed the fuel load and potential behavior of fire in these forests. In particular, the potential for high-intensity crownfires on drier sites now codominated by Pinus ponderosa and Abies concolor has increased. Increased landscape connectivity, in terms of fuel loadings and crown closure, has also increased the potential size of crownfires.

Pseudotsuga menziesii forests are the only true "fire-tolerant" occurrences in this group. Pseudotsuga menziesii forests were probably subject to a moderate-severity fire regime in presettlement times, with fire-return intervals of 30-100 years. Many of the important tree species in these forests are fire-adapted (Populus tremuloides, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus contorta) (Pfister et al. 1977), and fire-induced reproduction of Pinus ponderosa can result in its continued codominance in Pseudotsuga menziesii forests (Steele et al. 1981). Seeds of the shrub Ceanothus velutinus can remain dormant in forest occurrences for 200 years (Steele et al. 1981) and germinate abundantly after fire, competitively suppressing conifer seedlings. Successional relationships in this group are complex. Pseudotsuga menziesii is less shade-tolerant than many northern or montane trees such as Tsuga heterophylla, Abies concolor, Picea engelmannii, and seedlings compete poorly in deep shade. At drier locales, seedlings may be favored by moderate shading, such as by a canopy of Pinus ponderosa, which helps to minimize drought stress. In some locations, much of these forests have been logged or burned during European settlement, and present-day occurrences are second-growth forests dating from fire, logging, or other occurrence-replacing disturbances (Mauk and Henderson 1984, Chappell et al. 1997).

Picea pungens is a slow-growing, long-lived tree which regenerates from seed (Burns and Honkala 1990a). Seedlings are shallow-rooted and require perennially moist soils for establishment and optimal growth. Picea pungens is intermediate in shade tolerance, being somewhat more tolerant than Pinus ponderosa or Pseudotsuga menziesii, and less tolerant than Abies lasiocarpa or Picea engelmannii. It forms late-seral occurrences in the subhumid regions of the Utah High Plateaus. It is common for these forests to be heavily disturbed by grazing or fire.

In general, fire suppression has lead to the encroachment of more shade-tolerant, less fire-tolerant species (e.g., climax) into occurrences and an attendant increase in landscape homogeneity and connectivity (from a fuels perspective). This has increased the lethality and potential size of fires.

Environmental Description:  This group is widespread throughout the southern Rocky Mountains, occurring mostly on northerly and cooler aspects and less commonly westerly and southerly aspects at elevations ranging from 1200-3300 m. Landforms are variable and can include canyons, plateaus, draws, benches, hills, mesas, ravines, shoulder, sideslopes and toeslopes. Slopes can be gentle to extremely steep. Climate: Rainfall averages less than 75 cm per year (40-60 cm), with summer "monsoons" during the growing season contributing substantial moisture. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Geologic substrates include volcanic andesite, rhyolite, rhyolitic tuffs, colluvium, shale gneiss, granite, sandstone and limestone. Soils are variable from cobbles, clay loam, silt loam, sandy loam, sand, and gravel.

Geographic Range: This widespread group occurs throughout the southern Rocky Mountains, but extends west into the Great Basin in Nevada and east into the Trans-Pecos plateaus of Texas.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, NM, NV, TX, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Abies concolor Series (DeVelice et al. 1986)
>< Abies concolor Series (Moir and Ludwig 1979)
>< Pseudotsuga menziesii Series (DeVelice et al. 1986)
>< Pseudotsuga menziesii Series (Moir and Ludwig 1979)
> Blue Spruce: 216 (Eyre 1980)
>< Interior Douglas-fir: 210 (Eyre 1980)
>< White Fir: 211 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): W.H. Moir and J.A. Ludwig (1979)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-17-10

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., E. L. Fitzhugh, F. Ronco, Jr., and J. A. Ludwig. 1987. A classification of forest habitat types of the northern portion of the Cibola National Forest, NM. General Technical Report RM-143. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., F. Ronco, Jr., A. S. White, and J. A. Ludwig. 1984b. Douglas-fir habitat types of northern Arizona. General Technical Report RM-108. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 13 pp.
  • Boyce, D. A. 1977. Vegetation of the South Fork of the White River Valley, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 312 pp.
  • Bunin, J. E. 1975c. The vegetation of the west slope of the Park Range, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 235 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Chappell, C., R. Crawford, J. Kagan, and P. J. Doran. 1997. A vegetation, land use, and habitat classification system for the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of Oregon and Washington. Unpublished report prepared for Wildlife habitat and species associations within Oregon and Washington landscapes: Building a common understanding for management. Prepared by Washington and Oregon Natural Heritage Programs, Olympia, WA, and Portland, OR. 177 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. General Technical Report RM-131. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Fitzhugh, E. L., W. H. Moir, J. A. Ludwig, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1987. Forest habitat types in the Apache, Gila, and part of the Cibola national forests. General Technical Report RM-145. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 116 pp.
  • Giese, T. G. 1975. The ecology of the Middle Blue River Valley, Summit County, Colorado, with an analysis of modifications due to powerline construction. Unpublished thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder. 109 pp.
  • Heinze, D. H., R. E. Eckert, and P. T. Tueller. 1962. The vegetation and soils of the Steptoe Watershed. Unpublished report prepared for the USDI Bureau of Land Management. 40 pp.
  • Hess, K. 1981. Phyto-edaphic study of habitat types of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 558 pp.
  • Hess, K., and C. H. Wasser. 1982. Grassland, shrubland, and forest habitat types of the White River-Arapaho National Forest. Unpublished final report 53-82 FT-1-19. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 335 pp.
  • Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1980. Forest vegetation of the Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-221. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 41 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1983. Forest vegetation of the White River National Forest in western Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-249. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
  • Komarkova, V. K., R. R. Alexander, and B. C. Johnston. 1988b. Forest vegetation of the Gunnison and parts of the Uncompahgre national forests: A preliminary habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-163. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 65 pp.
  • Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Moir, W. H., and J. A. Ludwig. 1979. A classification of spruce-fir and mixed conifer habitat types of Arizona and New Mexico. Research Paper RM-207. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 47 pp.
  • Muldavin, E. H., R. L. DeVelice, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1996. A classification of forest habitat types of southern Arizona and portions of the Colorado Plateau. General Technical Report RM-GTR-287. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 130 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Zouhar, K. L. 2001a. Abies concolor. In: Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/] (accessed 27 April 2010).