Print Report
G032 Acer platanoides - Robinia pseudoacacia - Pinus sylvestris Exotic Ruderal Forest Group
Type Concept Sentence: This ruderal forest group is dominated by exotic tree species that establish on former agricultural or forest plantation sites, or on degraded native forest sites, in the cool temperate regions of the eastern United States and Canada.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Norway Maple - Black Locust - Scotch Pine Exotic Ruderal Forest Group
Colloquial Name: Eastern North American Exotic Ruderal Forest
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: This native ruderal forest group is found in the cool temperate regions of the eastern United States and Canada, from the East Coast, west to the Great Lakes and Tallgrass Prairie region and south to the south-central United States. The vegetation of this group shows evidence of former and heavy human disturbance, particularly to the soils, such as through plowing, grading, skidding, etc., but has otherwise been allowed to succeed more-or-less spontaneously. The vegetation is a disparate mix of exotic species, and the ecological and floristic organization of the vegetation is not clear. The tree layer is dominated (>80% cover) by exotic tree species. The list of exotic tree species include Conifers: Pinus thunbergii and Hardwoods: Acer platanoides, Ailanthus altissima, Malus fusca, and Robinia pseudoacacia. Although Robinia pseudoacacia is a native in the central hardwoods region, it is so widely planted outside of its range that it is exotic in character. Understory shrub and herb species vary from exotic invasives to native generalists. Invasive shrub species include a variety of honeysuckles (Lonicera japonica, Lonicera morrowii, Lonicera tatarica, Lonicera x bella), Rhamnus cathartica, and others. The most common exotic tree species found in abandoned plantations include Larix decidua, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris. Sites are often on dry-mesic to wet-mesic sites, suitable for agriculture or forest plantations.
Diagnostic Characteristics: A specified list of exotic species [see Floristics] form mono-dominant stands and typically have associated shrub and herb layers that contain generalist native or exotic species. The exotics are >80% (>90%?) of the canopy. Sites may show evidence of former and heavy human use as either agricultural fields or plantations. The most common exotics species found in abandoned plantations include Larix decidua, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris. Regeneration of tree species, if present at all, rarely consists of the current overstory, and understory shrub and herb species are often native generalists or exotics.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This group includes spontaneously formed exotic tree-dominated stands, with irregular structure, or abandoned forest plantations, which may still show some evidence of row planting. Dominant trees may be hardwood or conifer.
Floristics: The tree layer is dominated (>80% cover) by exotic tree species. The list of exotic tree species include Conifers: Pinus thunbergii and Hardwoods: Acer platanoides, Ailanthus altissima, Malus fusca, and Robinia pseudoacacia. Although Robinia pseudoacacia is a native in the central hardwoods region, it is so widely planted outside of its range that it is exotic in character. Understory shrub and herb species vary from exotic invasives to native generalists. Invasive shrub species include a variety of honeysuckles (Lonicera japonica, Lonicera morrowii, Lonicera tatarica, Lonicera x bella), Rhamnus cathartica, and others. Sites show evidence of former and heavy human use, particularly with extensive and intensive soil disturbances, including plowing, grading, skidding, etc. The most common exotic tree species found in abandoned plantations include Larix decidua, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris. They may be mixed with native tree species, including Picea glauca, Pinus banksiana, Pinus resinosa, Pinus strobus, and Pinus virginiana, particularly when these stands form from abandoned plantations.
Dynamics: Stands most typically represent the tree-dominated stage in the development of vegetation on sites that were heavily disturbed by humans, including plowing, grading, skidding, etc. In these cases, earlier stages of vegetation include annual and perennial weeds, grasslands and shrublands [see ~Eastern North American Ruderal Meadow & Shrubland Group (G059)$$]. Because the extensive soil disturbances typically lead to a mix of weedy native and exotic shrub and herb species, the stands take on a ruderal composition. Exotic tree species may initiate establishment before natives or outcompete natives. Canopy cover may be as low as 10%, but eventually stands may have more-or-less continuous canopy, leading to a shift to a more shade-tolerant ground layer. The successional stages of this type have been described in many studies, particularly the early stages of tree invasion into old fields (e.g., Singleton et al. 2001). See also Wright and Fridley (2010) for the biogeographic variation among stands of this type.
This type may also form in other ways. First, exotic forest plantation stands (tracked in 7. ~Agricultural & Developed Vegetation Cultural Class (CCL01)$$)) could become exotic ruderal stands if not intensively managed and the planted trees begin to die out. But because exotic planted trees only rarely regenerate on sites where they are planted, these stands more typically are invaded by native generalist trees and succeed to ~Eastern North American Native Ruderal Forest Group (G030)$$. Second, native forest stands that have not been plowed or planted may be stressed to the point where the characteristic native combination of species is altered (Curtis 1959). These stands are probably best tracked as altered variants of native types until the overstory itself is substantially altered to the point where exotics tree species are the dominant.
This type may also form in other ways. First, exotic forest plantation stands (tracked in 7. ~Agricultural & Developed Vegetation Cultural Class (CCL01)$$)) could become exotic ruderal stands if not intensively managed and the planted trees begin to die out. But because exotic planted trees only rarely regenerate on sites where they are planted, these stands more typically are invaded by native generalist trees and succeed to ~Eastern North American Native Ruderal Forest Group (G030)$$. Second, native forest stands that have not been plowed or planted may be stressed to the point where the characteristic native combination of species is altered (Curtis 1959). These stands are probably best tracked as altered variants of native types until the overstory itself is substantially altered to the point where exotics tree species are the dominant.
Environmental Description: Sites include uplands and marginally wet sites that have been altered by logging, clearing for agriculture or other activities. Sites are often on dry-mesic to wet-mesic sites, suitable for agriculture or forest plantations.
Geographic Range: This native ruderal forest group is found in the cool temperate regions of the eastern United States and Canada, from the East Coast, west to the Great Lakes and Tallgrass Prairie region and south to the south-central United States.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: AR, CT, DC, DE, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MB?, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NB, NC, ND, NE, NF, NH, NJ, NS, NY, OH, ON, PA, PE, QC, RI, SC?, SD, TN, VA, VT, WI, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.833275
Confidence Level: Low
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNA
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Na Eastern North American Forest & Woodland Division | D008 | 1.B.2.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Na.90 Black Locust - Tuliptree - Norway Maple Ruderal Forest Macrogroup | M013 | 1.B.2.Na.90 |
Group | 1.B.2.Na.90.b Norway Maple - Black Locust - Scotch Pine Exotic Ruderal Forest Group | G032 | 1.B.2.Na.90.b |
Alliance | A3230 Norway Maple - Tree-of-Heaven - Pine species Exotic Ruderal Forest Alliance | A3230 | 1.B.2.Na.90.b |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Reprinted in 1987. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 657 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Faber-Langendoen, D., and S. Menard. 2006. A key to eastern forests of the United States: Macrogroups, groups, and alliances. September 15, 2006. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Singleton, R., S. Gardescu, P. L. Marks, and M. A. Geber. 2001. Forest herb colonization of postagricultural forests in central New York State, USA. Journal of Ecology 89:325-338.
- Wright, J. P., and J. D. Fridley. 2010. Biogeographic synthesis of secondary succession rates in eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography 37:1584-1596.