Print Report

G029 Pinus taeda - Pinus spp. Ruderal Forest Group

Type Concept Sentence: This ruderal forest group is dominated by exotic tree species that establish on former agricultural or forest plantation sites, or on degraded native forest sites, in the southeastern United States.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Loblolly Pine - Pine species Ruderal Forest Group

Colloquial Name: Southeastern Exotic Ruderal Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: The vegetation of this group shows evidence of former and heavy human disturbance, particularly to the soils, such as through plowing, grading, skidding, etc., but has otherwise been allowed to succeed more-or-less spontaneously. The vegetation is a disparate mix of exotic species, and the ecological and floristic organization of the vegetation is not clear. The tree layer is dominated (>80% cover) by exotic tree species. Understory shrub and herb species may be a mix of exotic and native generalists. Dominant exotic tree species include Albizia julibrissin, Broussonetia papyrifera, Triadica sebifera, and Maclura pomifera. Maclura pomifera is a native species in a narrow region of the eastern U.S., but is so widely planted outside of its range that it is effectively exotic. Minor native associates include conifer Pinus taeda, and hardwoods Catalpa bignonioides, Catalpa speciosa, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Maclura pomifera, and Quercus nigra. Some plantation stands are planted for restoration purposes (e.g., to provide cover on abandoned farmland or land prone to erosion), and these may be allowed to mature and die, with native trees invading into the understory and eventually into the canopy.

Diagnostic Characteristics: A specified list of exotic tree species [see Floristics] form mono-dominant stands and typically have associated shrub and herb layers that contain native generalist or exotic species. The exotics are >80% (>90%?) of the canopy. Sites may show evidence of former and heavy human use as either agricultural fields or plantations. Regeneration of tree species, if present at all, rarely consists of the current overstory, and understory shrub and herb species are often native generalists or exotics.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This group includes spontaneously formed exotic tree-dominated stands, with irregular structure, or abandoned forest plantations, which may still show some evidence of row planting. Dominant trees may be hardwood or conifer.

Floristics: The tree layer is dominated (>80% cover) by exotic tree species. Understory shrub and herb species may be a mix of exotic species and native generalists. Dominant exotic tree species include Albizia julibrissin, Broussonetia papyrifera, Triadica sebifera (= Sapium sebiferum), and Maclura pomifera. Maclura pomifera is a native species in a narrow region of the eastern U.S., but is so widely planted outside of its range that it is effectively exotic. Minor native associates conifer Pinus taeda, and hardwoods Catalpa bignonioides, Catalpa speciosa, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Maclura pomifera, and Quercus nigra.

Dynamics:  Exotic tree species may initiate establishment before natives or outcompete natives. Canopy cover may be as low as 10%, but eventually stands may have more-or-less continuous canopy, leading to a shift to a more shade-tolerant ground layer. The successional stages of this type have been described in many studies, particularly the early stages of tree invasion into old fields (e.g., Singleton et al. 2001). See also Wright and Fridley (2010) for the biogeographic variation among stands of this type. This type may also form in other ways. First, exotic forest plantation stands (tracked in 7. ~Agricultural & Developed Vegetation Cultural Class (CCL01)$$)) could become exotic ruderal stands if not intensively managed and the planted trees begin to die out. But because exotic planted trees only rarely regenerate on sites where they are planted, these stands more typically are invaded by native generalist trees and succeed to ~Eastern North American Native Ruderal Forest Group (G030)$$. Second, native forest stands that have not been plowed or planted may be stressed to the point where the characteristic native combination of species is altered (Curtis 1959). These stands are probably best tracked as altered variants of native types until the overstory itself is substantially altered to the point where exotics tree species are dominant.

Environmental Description:  The sites where this vegetation occurs have experienced heavy former human use, including farming, pasture establishment and grazing, mining, repeated logging, etc. These sites may have been formerly cleared and/or planted, and the subsequent and current disturbance may be minimal to continuous.

Geographic Range: This type occurs in the south-central and southeastern United States.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MO?, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA?




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen and S. Menard (2006)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-12-15

  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Reprinted in 1987. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 657 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and S. Menard. 2006. A key to eastern forests of the United States: Macrogroups, groups, and alliances. September 15, 2006. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Singleton, R., S. Gardescu, P. L. Marks, and M. A. Geber. 2001. Forest herb colonization of postagricultural forests in central New York State, USA. Journal of Ecology 89:325-338.
  • Wright, J. P., and J. D. Fridley. 2010. Biogeographic synthesis of secondary succession rates in eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography 37:1584-1596.