Print Report
CEGL006474 Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (montana, alba) Forest
Type Concept Sentence: This eastern hemlock - hardwood forest is found on steep, north-facing sites along rivers and large streams in the Piedmont, and rarely the inner Coastal Plain, of Virginia and Maryland; examples contain the trees Fagus grandifolia, Quercus montana , Betula lenta, and Quercus rubra; Tsuga canadensis is common in the understory but was formerly codominant in the canopy.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern Hemlock - American Beech - (Chestnut Oak, White Oak) Forest
Colloquial Name: Piedmont-Coastal Plain Eastern Hemlock - Hardwood Forest
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This association is known from steep, north-facing sites along rivers and large streams in the Piedmont, Central Appalachians, and rarely the Inner Coastal Plain, of Virginia and Maryland. It typically occurs on steep, sheltered bluffs, slopes, and ravines with northerly aspects and infertile soils weathered from acidic or intermediate metamorphic and sedimentary rocks. Composition is usually that of a mixed forest, with overstory codominance by Tsuga canadensis, which is most abundant, and several hardwoods, most frequently Fagus grandifolia, Quercus alba, and/or Quercus montana. Tsuga canadensis, Fagus grandifolia, and Quercus montana are most constant, with Tsuga and Fagus typically having high cover in the understory and shrub, as well as overstory layers. Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus rubra, Acer rubrum, and Nyssa sylvatica are constant but minor overstory associates. Acer rubrum and Nyssa sylvatica also occur commonly in the understory. Quercus alba and Betula lenta are less constant in the overstory mixtures, but each is important in a subset of stands. True shrubs are often sparse but frequently include Viburnum acerifolium, Kalmia latifolia, Hamamelis virginiana, Rhododendron periclymenoides, and scrambling vines of Smilax rotundifolia. The herb layer is generally sparse to very sparse, but a number of species frequently occur at low cover, including Eurybia divaricata, Polystichum acrostichoides, Medeola virginiana, Dioscorea quaternata, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Thelypteris noveboracensis, Goodyera pubescens, and Carex digitalis. Less constant herbs that are occasionally important include Hexastylis virginica, Epigaea repens, Dryopteris marginalis, Polypodium virginianum, and Dennstaedtia punctilobula.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: The classification of this type was supported by analysis of data from 13 Virginia and Maryland plots during the National Capital Region Parks vegetation mapping project, plus observation data from additional sites.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Composition is usually that of a mixed forest, with overstory codominance by Tsuga canadensis, which is most abundant, and several hardwoods, most frequently Fagus grandifolia, Quercus alba, and/or Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus). Tsuga canadensis, Fagus grandifolia, and Quercus montana are most constant, with Tsuga and Fagus typically having high cover in the understory and shrub, as well as overstory layers. Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus rubra, Acer rubrum, and Nyssa sylvatica are constant but minor overstory associates. Acer rubrum and Nyssa sylvatica also occur commonly in the understory. Quercus alba and Betula lenta are less constant in the overstory mixtures, but each is important in a subset of stands. True shrubs are often sparse but frequently include Viburnum acerifolium, Kalmia latifolia, Hamamelis virginiana, Rhododendron periclymenoides, and scrambling vines of Smilax rotundifolia. The herb layer is generally sparse to very sparse, but a number of species frequently occur at low cover, including Eurybia divaricata, Polystichum acrostichoides, Medeola virginiana, Dioscorea quaternata, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Thelypteris noveboracensis, Goodyera pubescens, and Carex digitalis. Less constant herbs that are occasionally important include Hexastylis virginica, Epigaea repens, Dryopteris marginalis, Polypodium virginianum, and Dennstaedtia punctilobula. Species richness of 13 plot-sampled stands averaged 31 taxa per 400 m2.
Dynamics: The restriction of hemlock-hardwood forests to steep, sheltered slopes in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain is likely a function of both a suitably cool microclimate and protection from fire and logging. Such sites have been hypothesized to be Pleistocene refugia, i.e., stations where Tsuga has persisted from a wider distribution in colder climates of the late Wisconsin and early Holocene (Nemeth 1973). However, paleoecological studies indicate that these hemlock communities became established later in the Holocene, when streams probably served as migration corridors for Tsuga as the climate warmed (Prentice et al. 1991). The introduced Asiatic insect hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) is present in most, if not all, contemporary stands of this community. Outbreaks over the past two decades have caused at least some mortality of larger hemlocks in most stands, and some stands have been essentially devastated by the loss of most or all overstory hemlock. Increased sunlight from canopy gaps in these stands appears to have increased shrub densities, and likely contributes to less mesic site conditions, which decreases suitability for hemlock germination and growth. Although individual trees can be treated, there are currently no practical and economical treatments for forest stands.
Environmental Description: This community typically occurs on steep, sheltered, stream-fronting bluffs, slopes, and ravines with northerly aspects. Except on the few Coastal Plain sites, acidic or intermediate metamorphic or sedimentary bedrock underlies most sites. Rock outcrops or large boulders have moderate substrate cover (up to 15%) at some sites, and bryophyte cover is also often significant. Soils often have a thick organic surface horizon with a dense root mat. Samples collected from nine plots were extremely acidic (mean pH = 4.1), with low base saturation and cation status, except for high levels of iron and aluminum.
Geographic Range: The type is known from steep, north-facing bluffs along rivers and large streams in the Piedmont, and rarely the Inner Coastal Plain, of Virginia and Maryland. Stands at Harpers Ferry National Historical Park are located in the Central Appalachians of Virginia.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: MD, PA, VA, WV?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.802102
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G2G3
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Na Eastern North American Forest & Woodland Division | D008 | 1.B.2.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Na.3 Appalachian-Interior-Northeastern Mesic Forest Macrogroup | M883 | 1.B.2.Na.3 |
Group | 1.B.2.Na.3.a American Beech - Tuliptree - Yellow Buckeye Forest Group | G020 | 1.B.2.Na.3.a |
Alliance | A3304 Eastern Hemlock - Tuliptree Forest Alliance | A3304 | 1.B.2.Na.3.a |
Association | CEGL006474 Eastern Hemlock - American Beech - (Chestnut Oak, White Oak) Forest | CEGL006474 | 1.B.2.Na.3.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (prinus, alba) Forest (Fleming et al. 2007b)
= Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (prinus, alba) Forest (Fleming and Taverna 2006)
> Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus alba Forest (Coulling 1999)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus alba - Fagus grandifolia Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
> Tsuga canadensis - Quercus alba - Fagus grandifolia Forest (Lea 2003)
>< Tsuga canadensis - Quercus montana Forest (Lea 2003)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus montana Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus prinus Forest (Fleming 2002a)
= Tsuga canadensis / Hamamelis virginiana Forest (Fleming 2002b)
> Tsuga canadensis Piedmont Forest (Coulling 1999)
= Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (prinus, alba) Forest (Fleming and Taverna 2006)
> Tsuga canadensis - Fagus grandifolia - Quercus alba Forest (Coulling 1999)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus alba - Fagus grandifolia Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
> Tsuga canadensis - Quercus alba - Fagus grandifolia Forest (Lea 2003)
>< Tsuga canadensis - Quercus montana Forest (Lea 2003)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus montana Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Tsuga canadensis - Quercus prinus Forest (Fleming 2002a)
= Tsuga canadensis / Hamamelis virginiana Forest (Fleming 2002b)
> Tsuga canadensis Piedmont Forest (Coulling 1999)
- Abrahamson, W. G., and A. C. Gohn. 2004. Classification and successional changes of mixed-oak forests at the Mohn Mill Area, Pennsylvania. Castanea 69(3):194-206.
- Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
- Coulling, P. P. 1999. Eastern hemlock inventory and assessment for Prince William Forest Park, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 99-08. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 68 pp. plus appendices.
- Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
- Fleming, G. P. 2002a. Ecological communities of the Bull Run Mountains, Virginia: Baseline vegetation and floristic data for conservation planning and natural area stewardship. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 274 pp. plus appendices.
- Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
- Fleming, G. P. 2007. Ecological communities of the Potomac Gorge in Virginia: Composition, floristics, and environmental dynamics. Natural Heritage Technical Report 07-12. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 341 pp. plus appendices.
- Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
- Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
- Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
- Fleming, G. P., and K. Taverna. 2006. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, western region. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2006. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
- Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
- Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
- Lea, C. 2003. Vegetation types in the National Capital Region Parks. Draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. March 2003. 140 pp.
- Mahan, C., K.L. Sullivan, B. Black, K.C. Kim, and R.H. Yahner. 2004. Overstory tree composition of eastern hemlock stands threatened by the hemlock woolly adelgid at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Castanea 69(1):30-37.
- Nemeth, J. C. 1973. A mountain disjunct hemlock stand in the Piedmont of Virginia. Castanea 38:171-175.
- Prentice, I. C., P. J. Bartlein, and T. Webb, III. 1991. Vegetation and climate change in eastern North America since the last glacial maximum. Ecology 72:2038-2056.
- Zawadzkas, P. P., and W. G. Abrahamson. 2003. Composition and tree-size distributions of the Snyder-Middleswarth old-growth forest, Snyder County, Pennsylvania. Castanea 68:31-42.