Print Report

CEGL004148 Quercus montana - Pinus echinata / Vaccinium pallidum Piedmont Monadnock Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Chestnut Oak - Shortleaf Pine / Hillside Blueberry Piedmont Monadnock Forest

Colloquial Name: Piedmont Monadnock Chestnut Oak - Shortleaf Pine Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forest, dominated by Quercus montana and Pinus echinata, is found on dry, usually west-facing slopes of rocky remnant hills (monadnocks) in the southern Piedmont from North Carolina to Georgia. Shrub and herbaceous layers are usually patchy or sparse, with Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium stamineum, and Vitis rotundifolia most abundant.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association is very similar floristically to ~Quercus montana - Quercus alba / Oxydendrum arboreum / Vitis rotundifolia Forest (CEGL006281)$$, but the abundance of pine, correlated with a distinctive topographic setting, supports recognition as distinct. However, this type is more confined to the largest Piedmont monadnock landscapes, and comparable settings on smaller, more isolated monadnocks often lack it.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands of this Piedmont forest association are dominated by Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus) and Pinus echinata, with smaller amounts of Quercus alba, Carya glabra, Quercus stellata, and other species. The understory typically includes Oxydendrum arboreum, Nyssa sylvatica, and Acer rubrum, as well as canopy species. Lower strata are often patchy or sparse. A low-shrub layer dominated by Vaccinium pallidum and Vaccinium stamineum may occur in places. Vitis rotundifolia may form fairly dense ground cover patches in places, but seldom climbs into trees. Herbaceous layer species tend to be sparse and may include Chimaphila maculata, Hexastylis arifolia, and Danthonia spicata. With occurrence of occasional fire, herbaceous cover and diversity would likely be higher.

Dynamics:  Dynamics of these communities are not well-known. Pines generally are scattered or clumped in small groves, suggesting regeneration in small to medium-sized canopy gaps. These are small-patch communities that occur in rugged terrain, so fire is unlikely to have been any more frequent than the moderate frequency in the Piedmont matrix communities. Fire may have interacted with dryness to allow Pinus echinata to regenerate and persist in a stable long-term community. These communities usually occur in landscapes with other Quercus montana-dominated communities that have little Pinus echinata, and are differentiated from them by drier topographic aspect rather than correlated with apparent differences in disturbance history.

Environmental Description:  This forest is found on dry slopes of rocky, erosional remnant hills (monadnocks) in the southern Piedmont from North Carolina to Georgia, generally on west-facing slopes.

Geographic Range: This association has a potential distribution in the southern Piedmont from North Carolina to Georgia.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  GA?, NC, SC?




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < IA6a. Dry Shortleaf Pine - Oak - Hickory Forest (Allard 1990)

Concept Author(s): M. Pyne and M.P. Schafale

Author of Description: M. Pyne and M.P. Schafale

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-29-11

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.