Print Report

CEGL006438 Acer rubrum - Quercus spp. / Smilax spp. Serpentine Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Maple - Oak species / Greenbrier species Serpentine Forest

Colloquial Name: Red Maple - Oak / Greenbrier Serpentine Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This serpentine plant community is associated with soils derived from weathered serpentine bedrock and typically occurs on upper slopes and interfluves with a southerly aspect. Soils are typically silt loams, greater than 30 cm deep. In Pennsylvania serpentine barrens, the forest or woodland canopy is dominated by Acer rubrum and Quercus alba, as well as other oak species, including Quercus falcata, Quercus rubra, and Quercus velutina. On Staten Island, New York, the canopy includes Betula populifolia and Populus tremuloides in addition to Quercus velutina and Sassafras albidum. The subcanopy is characterized by Acer rubrum, Quercus alba, Nyssa sylvatica, and Prunus serotina. The shrub layer is dominated by Smilax rotundifolia and/or Smilax glauca. Vaccinium pallidum, Rubus allegheniensis, Gaylussacia baccata, Prunus serotina, Morella pensylvanica, Rhus copallinum, and/or Viburnum recognitum may also be present in the shrub layer. The herbaceous layer under the canopy cover is depauperate and typically dominated by Smilax rotundifolia, Smilax glauca, and Microstegium vimineum. Other typical herbaceous species include Danthonia spicata, Carex glaucodea, and Lonicera japonica.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This and a number of other serpentine vegetation community types were described by Podniesinski et al. (unpubl. data 1999); subsequently, former Pinus rigida / Schizachyrium scoparium - Scleria pauciflora Wooded Herbaceous Vegetation (CEGL006159) was archived as the type was too broad given the recent data describing more specific community types occurring within the eastern serpentine barrens. This type has 40% or more tree cover in comparison to the open grassland types that have less than 40% tree cover.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: In Pennsylvania serpentine barrens, the forest or woodland canopy is dominated by Acer rubrum and Quercus alba, as well as other oak species, including Quercus falcata, Quercus rubra, and Quercus velutina. On Staten Island, New York, the canopy includes Betula populifolia and Populus tremuloides in addition to Quercus velutina and Sassafras albidum. The subcanopy is characterized by Acer rubrum, Quercus alba, Nyssa sylvatica, and Prunus serotina. The shrub layer is dominated by Smilax rotundifolia and/or Smilax glauca. Vaccinium pallidum, Rubus allegheniensis, Gaylussacia baccata, Prunus serotina, Morella pensylvanica (= Myrica pensylvanica), Rhus copallinum, and/or Viburnum recognitum may also be present in the shrub layer. The herbaceous layer under the canopy cover is depauperate and typically dominated by Smilax rotundifolia, Smilax glauca, and Microstegium vimineum. Other typical herbaceous species include Danthonia spicata, Carex glaucodea, and Lonicera japonica.

Dynamics:  This plant community is adapted to the weathering of serpentine bedrock. It was once thought that the lack of canopy cover was maintained by the unique edaphic features of the chrome series soils, but in the last 20 years, many sites have been invaded by dense Pinus virginiana (Tyndall 1992a). In Pennsylvania, red maple and white oak are the canopy dominants of this type; while in New York, dominant canopy species include black oak, sassafras, and gray birch. This phenomenon dramatically alters the light regime and promotes substantial soil development (up to 10 cm in 20 years). Under these conditions, an entirely different community develops as the influence of the bedrock is buffered by the soil/litter accumulation. This closed-canopy serpentine forest typically exhibits a dense understory of Smilax rotundifolia. Some of the characteristic herbaceous serpentine species apparently persist in the ground layer as scattered non-flowering individuals; other populations appear to die out but may persist in the seed bank. Selective cutting has been effective in restoring degraded sites to their previous composition and structure, but most researchers believe that without regular burning to prevent soil development the serpentine plant communities will not persist. There is substantial evidence that most of the existing areas were regularly burned by Native Americans (Marye 1920, 1955a, 1955b, 1955c) and perhaps maintained by grazing after European settlement.

Environmental Description:  This serpentine plant community is associated with soils derived from weathered serpentine bedrock. It typically occurs on upper slopes and interfluves with a southerly aspect. Soils are silt loams, greater than 30 cm deep.

Geographic Range: This community occurs in serpentine barrens located within Chester and Lancaster counties in Pennsylvania and on Staten Island, New York.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  NY, PA




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G1G2

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: CEGL006159 was split into several distinct serpentine barrens types.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Smith''s Eastern Serpentine Barren (Podniesinski et al. 1999)

Concept Author(s): G. Podniesinski, A. Leimanis, and J. Ebert (1999)

Author of Description: G. Podniesinski, A. Leimanis, J. Ebert, G. Edinger, M. Anderson

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-20-05

  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Marye, W. B. 1920. The old Indian road. Maryland Historical Magazine 15:107-124, 208-229, 345-395.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955a. The great Maryland barrens I. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:11-23.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955b. The great Maryland barrens II. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:124-142.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955c. The great Maryland barrens III. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:234-253.
  • Podniesinski, G., A. Leimanis, and J. Ebert. 1999. Serpentine plant community classification. Unpublished data. Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh, PA. 14 pp.
  • Smith, T. L. No date (a). Natural ecological communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory, East, Harrisburg, PA. 97 pp.
  • Tyndall, R. W. 1992a. Historical considerations of conifer expansion in Maryland serpentine "barrens." Castanea 57:123-131.