Print Report

CEGL006186 Liriodendron tulipifera - Quercus rubra - Fraxinus americana / Asimina triloba / Actaea racemosa Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Tuliptree - Northern Red Oak - White Ash / Pawpaw / Black Baneberry Forest

Colloquial Name: Upper Piedmont-Northern Blue Ridge Basic Mesic Hardwood Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community is a mesic rich forest occurring in the Piedmont and lower-elevation Appalachians of Virginia and Maryland and possibly extending into adjacent West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. These forests are dominated by Liriodendron tulipifera, occurring with or codominating with Quercus rubra or Fraxinus americana. This community type occupies fertile, well-drained soils of mesic lower slopes and ravines, often in areas underlain by metabasalt of the Catoctin Formation but also on a variety of igneous metamorphic and metasedimentary rocks. Occasionally, stands occur on well-weathered boulder "streams" that have been deposited in low-elevation ravine bottoms and slope concavities. Other species possible in the overstory include Quercus alba, Quercus montana, Carya ovalis, Carya tomentosa, Carya cordiformis, Ulmus rubra, Nyssa sylvatica, Fagus grandifolia, and Juglans nigra. Subcanopy tree layers contain representatives of the overstory species and Acer rubrum. The lowest tree and shrub layers usually contain small to large colonies of Asimina triloba and Lindera benzoin, along with Cercis canadensis and Cornus florida. The herb layer is usually lush and dense, except where boulder streams prevail or deer grazing is severe. Patch-dominance of ferns and leafy forbs is characteristic; species achieving local abundance in the type include Adiantum pedatum, Amphicarpaea bracteata, Arisaema triphyllum, Asarum canadense, Actaea racemosa, Deparia acrostichoides, Hydrastis canadensis, Phegopteris hexagonoptera, Polystichum acrostichoides, and Uvularia perfoliata. Other constant or characteristic herbaceous species include Botrychium virginianum, Carex laxiflora var. laxiflora, Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis, Collinsonia canadensis, Cypripedium parviflorum var. pubescens, Desmodium nudiflorum, Galearis spectabilis, Galium circaezans, Galium triflorum, Hepatica nobilis var. obtusa, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Phryma leptostachya, Podophyllum peltatum, Sanguinaria canadensis, Sanicula canadensis, and Stellaria pubera. This association is distinguished from more montane rich cove forests by its lower-elevation habitats, shrub layer dominance by Asimina triloba (a low-elevation species in the Mid-Atlantic region), and the absence or unimportance of many common species of montane cove forests, e.g., Acer saccharum, Tilia americana, Caulophyllum thalictroides, Laportea canadensis, Osmorhiza claytonii, Impatiens pallida, and Trillium grandiflorum.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This description is based on analysis of 32 plots from Virginia and Maryland. This association is distinguished from more montane rich cove forests by its lower-elevation habitats, shrub-layer dominance by Asimina triloba (a low-elevation species in the Mid-Atlantic region), and the absence or unimportance of many common species of montane cove forests, e.g., Acer saccharum, Tilia americana, Caulophyllum thalictroides, Laportea canadensis, Osmorhiza claytonii, Impatiens pallida, and Trillium grandiflorum. Several plots from low elevations of Shenandoah National Park are intermediate between this type and ~Liriodendron tulipifera - Fraxinus americana - (Aesculus flava) / Actaea racemosa - Laportea canadensis Forest (CEGL007710)$$ and could be assigned equally well to either type. For the purposes of vegetation mapping in Shenandoah , these plots were assigned to CEGL007710.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The typical stand structure of this community type consists of a tall, closed overstory, with very open understory tree layers, and a variably dense shrub layer. The overstory of most stands is dominated or codominated by tall, straight Liriodendron tulipifera often exceeding 35 m in height. Fraxinus americana and Quercus rubra are the most frequent overstory associates and often codominate. Less frequent overstory associates that can sometimes codominate in discrete areas include Quercus alba, Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus), Carya ovalis, Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Carya cordiformis, Ulmus rubra, Nyssa sylvatica, Fagus grandifolia, and Juglans nigra. Subcanopy tree layers contain representatives of the overstory species and Acer rubrum. The lowest tree and shrub layers usually contain small to large colonies of Asimina triloba and Lindera benzoin, along with Cercis canadensis and Cornus florida. More locally important small trees and shrubs include Carpinus caroliniana and Hamamelis virginiana. High-climbing vines of Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Toxicodendron radicans, and Vitis spp. are common. The herb layer is usually lush and dense, except where boulder streams prevail or deer grazing is severe. Patch-dominance of ferns and leafy forbs is characteristic; species achieving local abundance in the type include Adiantum pedatum, Amphicarpaea bracteata, Arisaema triphyllum, Asarum canadense, Actaea racemosa (= Cimicifuga racemosa), Deparia acrostichoides, Hydrastis canadensis, Phegopteris hexagonoptera, Polystichum acrostichoides, and Uvularia perfoliata. The most constant, low-cover herbs in 22 Virginia and Maryland plots of the type are Botrychium virginianum, Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis, Desmodium nudiflorum, Galium circaezans, Galium triflorum, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Phryma leptostachya, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Sanicula canadensis. Additional characteristic herbs include Carex laxiflora var. laxiflora, Collinsonia canadensis, Cypripedium parviflorum var. pubescens, Galearis spectabilis, Hepatica nobilis var. obtusa, Podophyllum peltatum, and Stellaria pubera.

Dynamics:  Sites now supporting this community are some of the most productive in the Mid-Atlantic region, and most were cleared or cut over in the past. Dominance of Liriodendron tulipifera in stands is no doubt indicative of establishment following abandonment of fields, logging, and natural, large-scale forest disturbances. The ability of Liriodendron to opportunistically occupy and outgrow competitors in gaps created by windthrow and other disturbances apparently enables this species to maintain a position in older-aged mixed forests (Orwig and Abrams 1994, Busing 1995). Although many stands representing this community have probably reached an intermediate successional stage (70 to 140 years old) and become more mixed than a typical, early-successional forest dominated by Liriodendron tulipifera, their future development is unclear. Most plots contain Quercus rubra or Quercus alba in the overstory, but recruitment of these oaks is very low. The most numerous potential canopy species now present in the understory are hickories (Carya tomentosa, Carya cordiformis, and Carya ovalis), Fraxinus americana, and Nyssa sylvatica. In the absence of longer-lived and more tolerant species such as Fagus grandifolia or Acer saccharum (usually unimportant or absent in the type), it appears that maturing stands will gradually contain more mixed dominance by Liriodendron, Carya spp., Fraxinus, and perhaps Nyssa, with fewer Quercus spp. Most likely because of their moist fertile soils, habitats of this community type are very favorable for shade-tolerant, invasive introduced plants, particularly following small-scale soil disturbances. The most problematic introduced species include Microstegium vimineum, Rubus phoenicolasius, Lonicera japonica, and Alliaria petiolata. Mortality or partial die-back of Cornus florida resulting from the fungal pathogen dogwood anthracnose (Discula destructiva) and visible damage to herbaceous plants by grazing white-tailed deer have been noted in many stands of the type.

Environmental Description:  This community type occupies fertile, well-drained soils of mesic lower slopes and ravines. It is most extensive in areas underlain by metabasalt of the Catoctin Formation but also occurs on a variety of igneous metamorphic and metasedimentary rocks. Slopes vary from moderate to steep (range = 7-30°) and are typically straight or concave. The surface substrate usually has less than 10% exposed boulder and stone cover, and more than 90% cover of leaf litter and other humic material. However, a small number of stands occur on well-weathered boulder "streams" that have been deposited in low-elevation ravine bottoms and slope concavities. Soils are deep, dark loams or sandy loams of colluvial origin. Soil samples collected from representative stands were moderately acidic (mean pH is about 5.5 to 5.9), with moderately high Ca and high Mg, Mn, K, Cu, B, and total base saturation.

Geographic Range: This vegetation type is scattered in small to large patches throughout the lower Blue Ridge and northern and western Piedmont of Virginia, and much of the Maryland Piedmont and Blue Ridge. It has also been documented in Pennsylvania and may also occur in eastern West Virginia and the Piedmont portion of Delaware.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  DE?, MD, PA, VA, WV?




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Liriodendron tulipifera - Quercus rubra - Fraxinus americana / Lindera benzoin / Arisaema triphyllum Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Liriodendron tulipifera - Quercus rubra / Asimina triloba / Arisaema triphyllum - Cimicifuga racemosa Forest (Fleming 2002b)
= Liriodendron tulipifera - Quercus rubra / Asimina triloba / Arisaema triphyllum - Cimicifuga racemosa Forest (Fleming 2002a)
< Yellow-Poplar - White Oak - Northern Red Oak: 59 (Eyre 1980)
< Yellow-Poplar: 57 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): G.P. Fleming (2002a)

Author of Description: G.P. Fleming and K. D. Patterson

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-01-08

  • Busing, R. F. 1995. Disturbance and population dynamics of Liriodendron tulipifera: Simulations with a spatial model of forest succession. Journal of Ecology 83:4.
  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Davis, M. B. 1993. Old growth in the East: A survey. The Cenozoic Society, Richmond, Vermont.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002a. Ecological communities of the Bull Run Mountains, Virginia: Baseline vegetation and floristic data for conservation planning and natural area stewardship. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 274 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. Taverna. 2006. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, western region. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2006. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Orwig, D. A., and M. D. Abrams. 1994. Contrasting radical growth and canopy recruitment patterns in Liriodendron tulipifera and Nyssa sylvatica: Gap-obligate versus gap-facultative tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:2141-2149.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping at Appomattox Court House National Historical Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/125. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008b. Vegetation classification and mapping at Booker T. Washington National Monument, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/100. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 173 pp.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, W. A. Millinor, and L. A. Sneddon. 2006c. Vegetation classification and mapping at Gettysburg National Military Park and Eisenhower National Historic Park. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2006/058. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Townsend, J. F. 2006. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. Unpublished report. Natural Heritage Technical Report 06-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 58 pp. plus appendices.