Print Report
CEGL005896 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Menziesia ferruginea / Luzula glabrata Woodland
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Rusty Menziesia / Smooth Woodrush Woodland
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This association is a major upper subalpine woodland type in northwestern Montana (primarily west of the Continental Divide), Idaho, from the Idaho Batholith country northward, and southwestern Alberta, occurring primarily as a large-patch community but, also as a small-patch to matrix community type. It occurs as an open woodland. It generally forms a zone extending about 215 m (700 feet) vertically from various base elevations, which decrease with increasing latitude; in west-central Montana it ranges from 2075 to 2320 m, in northwestern Montana it ranges from 1830 to 2075 m. It usually occurs on moderate to steep slopes, just below the ridgeline or slope shoulder, with aspects ranging from just west of north-facing to east-facing. At its upper distributional limits it may occur on warmer aspects and flatter ground, often associated with the heads of cirque basins or shallow to deep swales. These are cold, relatively harsh sites where snowpack may persist long into the growing season. Soils are derived from a broad range of parent materials including Idaho Batholith granitics, calcareous and noncalcareous sedimentary, and metamorphic mica schists. Ground surfaces are usually litter-covered, but the soil generally contains a high fraction of coarse material, averaging about 30% and content increasing with depth. Vegetation structure is distinctly that of a woodland with widely spaced individual trees or a clumped distribution thereof to produce a total canopy cover of less than 50% dominated by Abies lasiocarpa with lesser representation by Picea engelmannii. Pinus contorta has a very limited presence; however, Larix lyallii may have 30% or greater cover, but its presence is rather unpredictable. The shrub component is dominated by Menziesia ferruginea, which ranges in height from 0.7 to 1.5 m (far less than its potential of 3+ m). Though the cover of Luzula glabrata (average about 8%) is much less than in ~Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Luzula glabrata var. hitchcockii Woodland (CEGL000317)$$, it is still sufficient to be indicative of this cold and snowpacked environment. The forb component has several consistently present species, including Xerophyllum tenax, Arnica latifolia, Orthilia secunda, and Viola orbiculata; only the first two named contribute more than trace amounts of cover in what is a depauperate layer.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This association has resulted from elevating a couple of phase levels of habitat types that appeared to define unique environments. The association defined here is not so broad as the Abies lasiocarpa / Luzula glabrata Habitat Type, Menziesia ferruginea Phase of Pfister et al. (1977) because it does not include stands with other seral tree species having appreciable cover, nor does this concept accept Pinus albicaulis as an alternative indicator to Luzula glabrata, where this latter species is lacking (Pfister et al. 1977). Stands with an appreciable cover (5%) of Pinus albicaulis have been placed into a separate association due to their unique ecology in light of blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) induced mortality. There is apparently much environmental overlap between Rhododendron albiflorum and Menziesia ferruginea but some distinct distributional differences; where the two geographically overlap intensive analysis and crosswalking need to be conducted to produce a seamless classification across geopolitical boundaries.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Vegetation structure is distinctly that of a woodland with widely spaced individual trees or a clumped distribution thereof to produce a total canopy cover of less than 50% dominated by Abies lasiocarpa with lesser representation by Picea engelmannii. Seral tree species generally do poorly here with only Pinus albicaulis constituting a consistent component with appreciable cover. Pinus contorta has a very limited presence; however, Larix lyallii may have 30% or greater cover, but its presence is rather unpredictable, occurring in some drainages and not others with equally favorable habitat. The shrub component is dominated by Menziesia ferruginea, which ranges in height from 0.7 to 1.5 m (2.5-5 feet), far less than its potential of 3+ m (10+ feet); Vaccinium membranaceum and Vaccinium scoparium have high constancy and coverages mostly exceeding 10%, whereas Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata and Rhododendron albiflorum are inconsistently present, though their coverages may be appreciable. Though the cover of Luzula glabrata (average about 8%) is much less than in ~Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Luzula glabrata var. hitchcockii Woodland (CEGL000317)$$, it is still sufficient to be indicative of this cold and snowpacked environment. Though there are no other graminoids of note, the forb component has several consistently present species including Xerophyllum tenax, Arnica latifolia, Orthilia secunda (= Pyrola secunda), and Viola orbiculata; only the first two named contribute more than trace amounts of cover in what is a depauperate layer.
Dynamics: Following disturbance the shrub layer can prolifically regenerate to choke off tree regeneration for a significant time and limit regeneration to the most shade-tolerant of species, Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii (which are the climax species as well).
Environmental Description: This association is a major upper subalpine woodland type in northwestern Montana (primarily west of the Continental Divide), Idaho, from the Idaho Batholith country northward, and southwestern Alberta, occurring primarily as a large-patch community but, also as a small-patch to matrix community type. It occurs as an open woodland. It generally forms a zone extending about 215 m (700 feet) vertically from various base elevations, which of course decrease with increasing latitude; in west-central Montana it ranges from 2075 to 2320 m (6800-7600 feet), in northwestern Montana it ranges from 1830 to 2075 m (6000-6800 feet) (Pfister et al. 1977). It usually occurs on moderate to steep slopes, just below the ridgeline or slope shoulder, with aspects ranging from just west of north-facing to east-facing. At its upper distributional limits it may occur on warmer aspects and flatter ground, often associated with the heads of cirque basins or shallow to deep swales. These are cold, relatively harsh sites where snowpack may persist long into the growing season. Soils are derived from a broad range of parent materials, including Idaho Batholith granitics, calcareous and noncalcareous sedimentary, and metamorphic mica schists. Ground surfaces are usually litter covered but the soil generally contains a high fraction of coarse material, averaging about 30% and content increasing with depth.
Geographic Range: This type is a very common at mid to predominantly upper subalpine zones from the Idaho Batholith northward to the southwestern portion of the Canadian Rockies, with a much stronger presence west of the Continental Divide.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: AB, ID, MT, WA?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.730852
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G4?
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Nb Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Division | D194 | 1.B.2.Nb |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Nb.5 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce - Whitebark Pine Rocky Mountain Forest Macrogroup | M020 | 1.B.2.Nb.5 |
Group | 1.B.2.Nb.5.c Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir - Mountain Hemlock Moist Forest & Woodland Group | G218 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.c |
Alliance | A3614 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Rocky Mountain Moist Forest Alliance | A3614 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.c |
Association | CEGL005896 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Rusty Menziesia / Smooth Woodrush Woodland | CEGL005896 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.c |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Menziesia ferruginea / Luzula glabrata var. hitchcockii Woodland (Hop et al. 2007)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Luzula hitchcockii Habitat Type, Menziesia ferruginea Phase (Pfister et al. 1977)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type, Luzula hitchcockii Phase (Steele et al. 1981)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type, Luzula hitchcockii Phase (Cooper et al. 1987)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Rhododendron albiflorum - Xerophyllum tenax Plant Association (Williams et al. 1995)
>< Picea engelmannii - Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type (Ogilvie 1962)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Luzula hitchcockii Habitat Type, Menziesia ferruginea Phase (Pfister et al. 1977)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type, Luzula hitchcockii Phase (Steele et al. 1981)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type, Luzula hitchcockii Phase (Cooper et al. 1987)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Rhododendron albiflorum - Xerophyllum tenax Plant Association (Williams et al. 1995)
>< Picea engelmannii - Abies lasiocarpa / Menziesia ferruginea Habitat Type (Ogilvie 1962)
- ANHIC [Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Community database files. Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development, Edmonton.
- Achuff, P. L., R. L. McNeil, M. L. Coleman, C. Wallis and C. Wershler. 2002. Ecological land classification of Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta. Volume I: Integrated resource description. Parks Canada, Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta. 226 pp.
- Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
- Hop, K., M. Reid, J. Dieck, S. Lubinski, and S. Cooper. 2007. U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI. 131 pp. plus Appendices A-L.
- Ogilvie, R. T. 1962. Ecology of spruce forests on the east slope of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta. Unpublished dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. 189 pp.
- Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
- Reid, M. S., S. V. Cooper, and G. Kittel. 2004. Vegetation classification of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. Final report for USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, International Peace Park Mapping Project. NatureServe, Arlington VA.
- Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
- Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
- Williams, C. K., B. F. Kelly, B. G. Smith, and T. R. Lillybridge. 1995. Forest plant associations of the Colville National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-360. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 140 pp.