Print Report

CEGL006395 Acer rubrum / Alnus incana - Ilex verticillata / Osmunda regalis Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Maple / Gray Alder - Common Winterberry / Royal Fern Woodland

Colloquial Name: Red Maple Wooded Fen

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This open-canopy red maple wetland occurs as part of peatlands in central and northern New England. It occurs in basin peatlands at elevations below 305 m (1000 feet), typically in a peripheral area of a larger peatland. The soils are Sphagnum-derived organic soils that remain saturated. Some minerotrophy is evident; these are fens rather than true bogs. Canopy cover ranges from quite open to about 65%, and the shrub layer is generally well-developed. Herb cover varies, but may be as high as 80%. The bryoid layer is usually more-or-less continuous. Acer rubrum is the dominant tree; associates may include Picea mariana, Abies balsamea, and Larix laricina. Larix laricina may be codominant with Acer rubrum, or dominant in occasional cases. The shrub layer is dominated by Ilex verticillata, in variable association with other species such as Ilex mucronata, Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides, Alnus incana, Myrica gale, Lyonia ligustrina, and Spiraea alba var. latifolia. The herbaceous layer generally includes Osmunda regalis, Osmunda cinnamomea, Coptis trifolia, Thelypteris palustris, and Onoclea sensibilis. Carex trisperma is the most frequent and abundant sedge; Carex canescens is often present but less abundant. The bryophyte layer is characterized by Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum fimbriatum, Sphagnum centrale, and others. This association is distinguished by its deep peat soils, peatland setting, open red maple-dominated canopy, and lack of any richness indicators.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Canopy cover ranges from quite open to about 65%, and the shrub layer is generally well-developed. Herb cover varies, but may be as high as 80%. The bryoid layer is usually more-or-less continuous. Acer rubrum is the dominant tree; associates may include Picea mariana, Abies balsamea, and Larix laricina. Larix laricina may be codominant with Acer rubrum, or dominant in occasional cases. The shrub layer is dominated by Ilex verticillata, in variable association with other species such as Ilex mucronata (= Nemopanthus mucronatus), Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides, Alnus incana, Myrica gale, Lyonia ligustrina, and Spiraea alba var. latifolia (= Spiraea latifolia). The herbaceous layer generally includes Osmunda regalis, Osmunda cinnamomea, Coptis trifolia, Thelypteris palustris, and Onoclea sensibilis. Carex trisperma is the most frequent and abundant sedge; Carex canescens is often present but less abundant. The bryophyte layer is characterized by Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum fimbriatum, Sphagnum centrale, and others.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This open-canopy red maple wetland occurs as part of peatlands in central and northern New England. It occurs in basin peatlands at elevations below 305 m (1000 feet), typically in a peripheral area of a larger peatland. The soils are Sphagnum-derived organic soils that remain saturated. Some minerotrophy is evident; these are fens rather than true bogs.

Geographic Range: This swamp type occurs at low elevations in central New England.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  ME, NB, NH, NY, QC?, VT?




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Red Maple Wooded Fen (Gawler 2002)
? Red maple acidic wooded peatland (NAP pers. comm. 1998)

Concept Author(s): S.C. Gawler (2002)

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-27-03

  • Anderson, D. S., and R. B. Davis. 1997. The vegetation and its environment in Maine peatlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:1785-1805.
  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Gawler, S. C. 1998. Priorities and tools for protecting peatlands in Maine. A report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME. 135 pp.
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Lubinski, S., K. Hop, and S. Gawler. 2003. Vegetation Mapping Program: Acadia National Park, Maine. Report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, and Maine Natural Areas Program in conjunction with M. Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program, and K. Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator), USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and NatureServe. [http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/ftp/vegmapping/acad/reports/acadrpt.pdf]
  • NAP [Northern Appalachian-Boreal Forest Working Group]. 1998. Northern Appalachian-Boreal Working group discussions. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.