Print Report

CEGL006605 Quercus (phellos, palustris, michauxii) - Liquidambar styraciflua / Cinna arundinacea Floodplain Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: (Willow Oak, Pin Oak, Swamp Chestnut Oak) - Sweetgum / Sweet Woodreed Floodplain Forest

Colloquial Name: Coastal Plain Oak Floodplain Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This floodplain swamp forest occurs in backswamps and topographic depressions within alluvial floodplains of large streams and small rivers. Along smaller headwater streams, it may occur in low, poorly drained floodplains with braided channels and depressions. Standing water is present for much of the year on loam or clay loam soils. The overstory is dominated by variable mixtures of Quercus phellos, Quercus palustris, Quercus michauxii, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer rubrum. The proportion of the latter two species typically increases with disturbance. The understory is commonly quite open and contains young Acer rubrum, several climbing vines, Carpinus caroliniana, Ilex opaca var. opaca, Asimina triloba, Viburnum dentatum, Ilex verticillata, and other species. The herb layer is usually well-developed, with a prominent graminoid component. Common herbaceous patch-dominants include Cinna arundinacea, Carex debilis var. debilis, Carex intumescens, Glyceria striata, and Carex tribuloides.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association is supported by analysis of a 1250-plot regional dataset assembled for the NCR and Mid-Atlantic national parks vegetation mapping project. In that analysis, this type was represented by a group of 37 Maryland and 10 northern Virginia plots.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The overstory is dominated by variable mixtures of Quercus phellos, Quercus palustris, Quercus michauxii, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer rubrum. The proportion of the latter two species typically increases with disturbance. Other canopy associates include Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Nyssa sylvatica, Ulmus americana, Quercus pagoda, Quercus lyrata, and Betula nigra. Climbing vines of Smilax rotundifolia, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Toxicodendron radicans, and Campsis radicans are common and characteristic. The subcanopy and shrub layers tend to be open and composed of young recruitment of Acer rubrum, along with Carpinus caroliniana (usually dominant), Ilex opaca var. opaca, Asimina triloba, Euonymus americanus, Viburnum dentatum, Ilex verticillata, and Lindera benzoin. The herb layer is usually well-developed, with a prominent graminoid component. Common herbaceous patch-dominants include Cinna arundinacea, Carex debilis var. debilis, Carex intumescens, Glyceria striata, and Carex tribuloides. Additional characteristic herbs include Boehmeria cylindrica, Arisaema triphyllum, Lycopus virginicus, Athyrium filix-femina ssp. asplenioides, Impatiens capensis, Leersia virginica, Onoclea sensibilis, Symphyotrichum lateriflorum, and Rubus hispidus. Many other species occur at low constancy and cover. Mean species richness of 47 Maryland and Virginia plot samples was 38 taxa per 400 m2.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This floodplain swamp forest occurs in backswamps and topographic depressions within alluvial floodplains of large streams and small rivers. Along smaller headwater streams, it may occur in low, poorly drained floodplains with braided channels and depressions. Sites are probably overflowed annually, and depressions retain standing water well into the growing season. Soils are somewhat to very poorly drained loams or clay loams that are strongly to extremely acidic and infertile.

Geographic Range: This community is found in the Chesapeake Bay region. It is most characteristic of the Coastal Plain but also extends into the extreme eastern part of the Piedmont.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  DC, DE, MD, NJ, VA




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: Liquidambar styraciflua - Quercus palustris / Carpinus caroliniana / Carex intumescens Forest (CEGL006602) and Acer rubrum - Quercus palustris - Carya (ovata, alba) / Carpinus caroliniana Forest (CEGL006949) merged into CEGL006605. CEGL007327 was split into CEGL006601 (which was subsequently merged into CEGL004418) and CEGL006602 (which was subsequently merged into CEGL006605).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Acer rubrum - Liquidambar styraciflua - Quercus (palustris, phellos) Forest (Fleming 2002a)
? Acer rubrum - Liquidambar styraciflua - Quercus (palustris, phellos) Seasonally Flooded Forest (Patterson pers. comm.)
= Acer rubrum - Quercus (phellos, palustris) / Cinna arundinacea Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Quercus (palustris, phellos) - Acer rubrum - Cinna arundinacea Forest (Thomson et al. 1999)
= Quercus (palustris, phellos) - Acer rubrum / Campsis radicans - Aster lateriflorus Seasonally Flooded Forest (McCoy and Fleming 2000)
= Quercus michauxii - Ulmus americana / Bignonia capreolata / Athyrium filix-femina - Rubus flagellaris - Carex tribuloides Forest (Walton et al. 2001)

Concept Author(s): D. Thomson and L.A. Sneddon

Author of Description: D. Thomson, L.A. Sneddon, G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-15-07

  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002a. Ecological communities of the Bull Run Mountains, Virginia: Baseline vegetation and floristic data for conservation planning and natural area stewardship. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 274 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2011b. Analysis of Coastal Plain / Outer Piedmont bottomlands and non-alluvial wetlands in Virginia, 400 plots. In-house analysis, January 2011. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., and P. Stango, III. 2003. Shrubland tidal wetland communities of Maryland''s Eastern Shore: Identification, assessment and monitoring. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 118 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • McCoy, K. M., and G. P. Fleming. 2000. Ecological communities of U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Army. Natural Heritage Technical Report 00-08. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 156 pp. plus appendices.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008e. Vegetation classification and mapping at Petersburg National Battlefield, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/127. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 235 pp.
  • Patterson, Karen D. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
  • Taverna, K. and K. D. Patterson. 2008. Vegetation classification and mapping at Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR-2008/126. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 277 pp.
  • Thomson, D., A. M. Gould, and M. A. Berdine. 1999. Identification and protection of reference wetland natural communities in Maryland: Potomac watershed floodplain forests. The Biodiversity Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Division. Annapolis. 119 pp.
  • Walton, D. P., P. P. Coulling, J. Weber, A. Belden, Jr., and A. C. Chazal. 2001. A plant community classification and natural heritage inventory of the Pamunkey River floodplain. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01-19. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 200 pp. plus appendices.