Print Report
CEGL000804 Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Limber Pine / Curl-leaf Mountain-mahogany Woodland
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: No Data Available
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Woodlands included in this association from California are very different and need further study to see if they should be included in this association.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: No Data Available
Dynamics: No Data Available
Environmental Description: No Data Available
Geographic Range: No Data Available
Nations: US
States/Provinces: CA, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.689228
Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G4
Greasons: No Data Available
| Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
| Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
| Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
| Division | 1.B.2.Nb Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Division | D194 | 1.B.2.Nb |
| Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Nb.5 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce - Whitebark Pine Rocky Mountain Forest Macrogroup | M020 | 1.B.2.Nb.5 |
| Group | 1.B.2.Nb.5.h Limber Pine - Great Basin Bristlecone Pine Intermountain Basins Subalpine Woodland Group | G224 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.h |
| Alliance | A2035 Limber Pine Intermountain Basins Forest & Woodland Alliance | A2035 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.h |
| Association | CEGL000804 Limber Pine / Curl-leaf Mountain-mahogany Woodland | CEGL000804 | 1.B.2.Nb.5.h |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Cercocarpus ledifolius - Pinus flexilis - Pinus longaeva Potential Native Plant Community (Eddleman and Jaindl 1994)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius (Jones and Ogle 2000)
? Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius (Sawyer et al. 2009) [87.160.01]
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Community Type (DeVelice 1992)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius (Jones and Ogle 2000)
? Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius (Sawyer et al. 2009) [87.160.01]
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Community Type (DeVelice 1992)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984)
= Pinus flexilis / Cercocarpus ledifolius Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981)
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- DeVelice, R. L. 1992. Classification of the plant communities of Beaverhead, Silver Bow, and Madison counties, Montana. Volume I (text). Prepared for the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp.
- Eddleman, L. E., and R. Jaindl. 1994. Great Basin National Park vegetation analysis. Technical Report NPS/PNROSU/NRTR-94/02. National Park Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, WA. 110 pp.
- Jones, G., and S. Ogle. 2000. Characterization abstracts for vegetation types on the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone national forests. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Region 2 by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
- MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
- Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
- Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
- Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
- Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.