Print Report

CEGL006375 Quercus coccinea - Quercus velutina / Sassafras albidum / Vaccinium pallidum Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Scarlet Oak - Black Oak / Sassafras / Blue Ridge Blueberry Forest

Colloquial Name: Northeastern Coastal Oak / Heath Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This dry coastal and coastal plain oak-heath forest of New England and the northeastern Coastal Plain occurs on rapidly drained, nutrient-poor, sandy or gravelly soils. North of the glacial border, these soils are typically found on till or outwash. The canopy is dominated by Quercus coccinea, Quercus velutina, and Quercus alba, the latter species particularly characteristic of gravel substrates. Other less abundant canopy associates include Quercus prinus, Betula lenta, and Ilex opaca (usually less than 15% cover). Pinus rigida is a common associate but occurs at low cover. Sassafras albidum may occur in low cover and may indicate influence by coastal (but not maritime) climate where this type occurs. Castanea dentata saplings can be common. A ''lawn-like'' dwarf-shrub heath layer dominated by Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium angustifolium, and Gaylussacia baccata is characteristic. Gaylussacia frondosa also occurs in some stands. The herbaceous layer is typically sparse, with Carex pensylvanica, Pteridium aquilinum, and Gaultheria procumbens being the most common. Herb diversity is greater in small canopy gaps, where Helianthemum canadense, Tephrosia virginiana, Aureolaria spp., Lespedeza spp., Lechea spp., and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi occur.

In New Jersey, this type ranges throughout the Coastal Plain and the central Pinelands. It includes oak-pine forests with a low heath stratum, found on sandy to loamy soils in the Pinelands. The forests often have a closed to partially-closed canopy characterized by dry-site oaks such as Quercus coccinea, Quercus velutina, Quercus alba, Quercus prinus, and Quercus stellata. Tree oak cover is typically 50-100%, and shrub oaks are rare or absent. Associate canopy species include Pinus rigida and/or Pinus echinata, with covers typically 5-10% (up to 25%). Sassafras albidum is often present in small amounts in the canopy and midstory. Fire-sensitive hardwoods and holly are absent. Low heath shrubs include Gaylussacia baccata, Gaylussacia frondosa, and Vaccinium pallidum, while some areas can have Kalmia latifolia joining the shrub layer. Herbs are sparse but often include Pteridium aquilinum, Gaultheria procumbens and Melampyrum lineare, with Tephrosia virginiana and Carex pensylvanica in openings.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This dry coastal oak-heath forest is dominated by Quercus coccinea, Quercus velutina, and Quercus alba, the latter species particularly characteristic of gravel substrates. Other less abundant canopy associates include Quercus prinus, Betula lenta, and Ilex opaca (usually less than 15% cover). Pinus rigida is a common associate but occurs at low cover. Sassafras albidum may occur in low cover and may indicate influence by coastal (but not maritime) climate where this type occurs. Castanea dentata saplings can be common. A ''lawn-like'' dwarf-shrub heath layer dominated by Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium angustifolium, and Gaylussacia baccata is characteristic. Gaylussacia frondosa also occurs in some stands. The herbaceous layer is typically sparse, with Carex pensylvanica, Pteridium aquilinum, and Gaultheria procumbens being the most common. Herb diversity is greater in small canopy gaps, where Helianthemum canadense, Tephrosia virginiana, Aureolaria spp., Lespedeza spp., Lechea spp., and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi occur.

Dynamics:  This is a coastal forest that occurs beyond direct influence of maritime processes.

Environmental Description:  This association occurs on rapidly drained, nutrient-poor, sandy or gravelly soils. North of the glacial border, these soils are typically found on till or outwash.

Geographic Range: This type occurs in coastal areas from New Hampshire to New Jersey.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, NH, NJ, NY, RI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: included

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Quercus velutina / Vaccinium pallidum community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
? Black oak savanna (Rawinski 1984a)
? CNE Mesic hardwood Forest on acidic bedrock / till (Rawinski 1984a)
> Central Pinelands Oak - Pine Forest (OP1) (Windisch 2014a)
? Maritime Oak Forest Community (on Uplands) (Lundgren 2000)
? Maritime forest (Rawinski 1984a)
> Oak - Heath Forest (OE1) (Windisch 2014a)
> Oak - Heath Successional Woodland (SOE) (Windisch 2014a)
> Oak - Pine Successional Woodland (SOP) (Windisch 2014a)
? Oak-Mixed Heath Forest (Greller 1977)
? Southern New England oak / pine forest on sandy / gravelly soils (Rawinski 1984a)

Concept Author(s): D. Hunt (NYNHP)

Author of Description: S.L. Neid and L.A. Sneddon

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-31-15

  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Clark, J. S. 1986a. Vegetation and land-use history of the William Floyd Estate, Fire Island National Seashore, Long Island, New York. USDI, National Park Service, North Atlantic Region, Office of Scientific Studies. 126 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Greller, A. M. 1977. A classification of mature forests on Long Island, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 104:376-382.
  • Klopfer, S. D., A. Olivero, L. Sneddon, and J. Lundgren. 2002. Final report of the NPS Vegetation Mapping Project at Fire Island National Seashore. Conservation Management Institute, GIS & Remote Sensing Division, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. 193 pp.
  • Lundgren, J. 2000. Lower New England - Northern Piedmont Ecoregion Forest Classification. The Nature Conservancy, Conservation Science, Boston, MA. 72 pp.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Motzkin, G., and D. R. Foster. 2002. Grasslands, heathlands and shrublands in coastal New England: Historical interpretations and approaches to conservation. Journal of Biogeography 29:1569-1590. [http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/sites/harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/files/publications/pdfs/Motzkin_JBiogeography_2002_Grasslands.pdf]
  • NatureServe. 2009. Vegetation of the E.B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA. U.S.A. Data current as of 1 December 2009.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 pp.
  • Sneddon, L. A., Zaremba, R. E., and M. Adams. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. Natural Resources Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2010/147. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 481 pp. [http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/caco/cacorpt.pdf]
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Windisch, A .G. 2014a. Pinelands ecological communities and higher level groups with crosswalk / proposed 2008 revisions to NVC. November 16, 2014 draft. New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Trenton.