Print Report

CEGL002584 Laurentian-Northeast Eroding Bluff Sparse Vegetation

Type Concept Sentence: Stands consist of steep-sloped to near-vertical exposures of eroded unconsolidated material (glacial drift, clay) or weak rock (shale) in the upper Midwest and northeastern United States and adjacent Canada.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Laurentian-Northeast Eroding Bluff Sparse Vegetation

Colloquial Name: Eroding Clay Bank

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This eroding bluff type is found localized along banks of rivers and lakes in the upper midwestern (Laurentian) and northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Stands occur on active steep and near-vertical exposures of unconsolidated clays, sands, and mixed glacial drift, that are at least 3 m in height, and up to or over 30 m in height. Stands are subject to active erosional processes. They are typically found along lakes and rivers. Moisture and temperature fluctuations can be extreme. The vegetation varies from moderately sparse to absent, and what vegetation is present is virtually always early-successional relative to the surrounding landscape due to periodic slumpage and soil erosion. Limited information is available on species that persist in this habitat.

In Michigan, characteristic species include Alnus spp., Salix spp., Thuja occidentalis, Betula papyrifera, Hypericum kalmianum, Shepherdia canadensis, Parnassia glauca, Solidago spp., Euthamia graminifolia, Impatiens capensis, Juncus spp., and Equisetum spp. In Vermont, characteristic native plants include Cyperus lupulinus, Dichanthelium depauperatum, Ionactis linariifolius, Toxicodendron radicans, and Polygonella articulata.

Due to the frequency of disturbance and the shifting exposure of substrate, native and non-native ruderal species are common. Clay bluffs are also characterized by very active seepage, and groundwater seepage is a destabilizing factor, causing bluff erosion and the sloughing or slumping of the clay slopes. Active sloughing typically occurs following frost heave, spring thaw, and winter storm events and vegetation varies from year to year. Wind and waves also cause erosion, especially along low bluffs and the toeslopes of bluffs.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type is found along lakes and rivers, but much more rangewide information is needed to characterize this type. Edinger et al. (2014a) describes two New York communities that may be classified as CEGL002584: (1) Great Lakes bluff, and (2) Riverside/lakeside bluff. Given the landscape setting and scale of ecological processes that maintain these communities, these two New York communities may warrant separate NVC associations. Vegetation differences between the two types are also likely, but more survey work is needed to confirm that presumption. Josh Cohen (pers. comm. 2017) recommends merging ~Midwest Eroding Bluff Sparse Vegetation (CEGL002315)$$ with this type.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The vegetation ranges from moderately sparse to absent, with sparse cover of trees, shrubs, forbs and graminoids. Little information is available on species that persist in this habitat; ruderal species tend to be common.

Floristics: The sparse vegetation is variable in composition, as the eroding bluffs, when stabilized, are colonized by species from adjacent forests. In Michigan, characteristic species include Alnus spp., Salix spp., Thuja occidentalis, Betula papyrifera, Hypericum kalmianum, Shepherdia canadensis, Parnassia glauca, Solidago spp., Euthamia graminifolia, Impatiens capensis, Juncus spp., and Scirpus spp. (Cohen et al. 2015). In Wisconsin, species include many of those in Michigan, as well as woody shrubs such as Symphoricarpos albus, Cornus sericea, Physocarpus opulifolius, and Diervilla lonicera. Among the more frequent and widespread herbs in Wisconsin are Solidago canadensis, Erigeron strigosus, Symphyotrichum lanceolatum, and Anaphalis margaritacea, and, in sites with more moisture, Carex aurea, Carex eburnea, Equisetum scirpoides, and Equisetum arvense. Both native and exotic weedy pioneers, such as Chamerion angustifolium, Hieracium aurantiacum, Taraxacum officinale, and Cirsium arvense can be common (WDNR 2017). In Vermont, characteristic native plants include Cyperus lupulinus (= Cyperus filiculmis), Dichanthelium depauperatum (= Panicum depauperatum), Ionactis linariifolius (= Aster linariifolius), Toxicodendron radicans, Polygonella articulata (Thompson and Sorenson 2000). Due to the frequency of disturbance and the shifting exposure of substrate, native and non-native ruderal species are common.

Dynamics:  Stands are subject to active erosional processes (Lee et al. 1998). These bluffs can be characterized by very active seepage, with a high portion of the slopes percolating groundwater, especially during the rapid spring discharge. Groundwater seepage can be a destabilizing factor within these systems, causing bluff erosion and the sloughing or slumping of clay slopes (Chase et al. 1999, Chase and Kehew 2000). Active sloughing typically occurs following frost heave, spring thaw, and winter storm events and as a result vegetation can vary from year to year. It is thought that periods of high groundwater movement are correlated with large erosion events along bluffs and that when water tables are low and groundwater movement is reduced, woody species encroachment occurs as the bluff faces become drier (Chase et al. 1999, Fuller 2009). In addition to groundwater, wind and waves also cause erosion, especially along low bluffs and the toeslopes of bluffs (Jibson et al. 1994, Chase et al. 1999, Brown et al. 2005, Swenson et al. 2006, Fuller 2009).

Environmental Description:  This eroding bluff type is found localized along banks of rivers and lakes in the upper midwestern (Laurentian) and northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, including all Great Lakes shorelines. Stands occur on active steep and near-vertical exposures of unconsolidated clays, sandy clays and mixed glacial drift that are at least 3 m in height. Moisture and temperature fluctuations can be extreme (Lee et al. 1998). In Michigan, bluffs occur infrequently along the Lake Michigan and Lake Superior shorelines and are less commonly found localized along banks of rivers and streams that form deep ravines through clay soils and drain into these Great Lakes (Albert 1995b).

Geographic Range: This eroding bank type is found localized along banks of rivers and lakes in the midwestern and northeastern United States and adjacent Canada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MA, MB, MD, ME, MI, MN, NH, NY, ON, QC?, VT, WI




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Eroding Clay Bank Sparse Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001)

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen and S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-04-18

  • Albert, D. A. 1995b. Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: A working map and classification. General Technical Report NC-178. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN. 250 pp. plus maps.
  • Brown, E. A., C. H. Wu, D. M. Mickelson, and T. B. Edil. 2005. Factors controlling rates of bluff recession at two sites on Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31:306-321.
  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Chase, R. B., A. E. Kehew, and W. William. 1999. The destabilizing influences of perched ground water in shoreline bluffs composed of heterogeneous glacial materials. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 31(7).
  • Chase, R. B., and A. E. Kehew. 2000. Potential stabilization of Great Lakes shoreline bluffs by removal of ground water. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 32(7).
  • Cohen, J. G., M. A. Kost, B. S. Slaughter, and D. A. Albert. 2015. A field guide to the natural communities of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI. 362 pp.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Fuller, N. 2009. Clay seepage bluffs: Conservation and management of a rare and unusual natural community. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI. 33 pp.
  • Greenall, J. A. 1996. Manitoba''s terrestrial plant communities. MS Report 96-02. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre, Winnipeg.
  • Homoya, M. A., J. Aldrich, J. Bacone, L. Casebere, and T. Post. 1988. Indiana natural community classification. Indiana Natural Heritage Program, Indianapolis, IN. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010a. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Wisconsin. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/199. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 310 pp.
  • Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010c. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Michigan. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/201. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. 358 pp.
  • Jibson, R. W., J. K. Odum, and J. M. Staude. 1994. Rates and processes of bluff recession along the Lake Michigan shoreline in Illinois. Journal of Great Lakes Research 20:135-152.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2017. Natural communities, aquatic features, and selected habitats of Wisconsin. Chapter 7 in: The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: an assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131H 2017. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.