Print Report

CEGL002605 Pinus contorta var. contorta / Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Beach Pine / Kinnikinnick Woodland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: These woodlands are found discontinuously along the coast between northern California and southwestern Washington. This woodland association occurs on all aspects on dry, partially-stabilized sand ridges, slopes, and flats, between open sand and the forest edge. Stands also occur on dry deflation plains. Requirements seem to be minimal sand movement, and well-drained, exposed sites. Pinus contorta var. contorta dominates the very open canopy, with stunted trees averaging 31% cover. Young Pseudotsuga menziesii or Picea sitchensis trees can occasionally be found. All stands are dominated by conspicuous mats of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, reindeer lichens and mosses. Common species of lichens and mosses include Cladina portentosa ssp. pacifica, Cladonia cervicornis ssp. verticillata, Racomitrium ericoides, Polytrichum juniperinum and Polytrichum piliferum. These cryptogams form thin, fragile mats growing over bare sand, with very little organic matter. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi may cover up to 75% of stands, mosses up to 80%, and lichens up to 25%. The early seral status of the association is confirmed by the virtual lack of dead trees, and live basal area is the lowest of any forest or woodland association described from coastal dunes. The shrub layer is depauperate, and most vegetation is confined to the ground layer. Pteridium aquilinum, Aira caryophyllea and Allotropa virgata may be conspicuous. Areas of open sand often contain remnants of earlier seral stages, such as Festuca rubra, Poa macrantha or Lupinus littoralis. These woodlands are easily distinguished by the open and low-shrub understory and dense lichen mats. The type is the only Pinus contorta var. contorta woodland with significant cover of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: No Data Available

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  No Data Available

Geographic Range: This community occurs on stabilized coastal sand dunes distributed discontinuously between northern California and southwestern Washington.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CA, OR, WA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G1

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Shore Pine / Bearberry Woodland (Pinus contorta var. contorta / Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) (Christy et al. 1998) [(p.68)]

Concept Author(s): J.A. Christy et L. (1998)

Author of Description: J.S. Kagan and J.A. Christy

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-26-97

  • Alpert, P. 1984. Inventory and analysis of Oregon coastal dunes. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland, OR.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Christy, J. A., J. S. Kagan, and A. M. Wiedemann. 1998. Plant associations of the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area - Siuslaw National Forest, Oregon. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-09-98. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 196 pp.
  • Duebendorfer, T. 1992. Vegetation classification, rare plant analysis, impacts, restoration, and habitat management strategies for the Humboldt County Beach and Dunes Management Plan. Report to Humboldt County Planning and Building Department, Eureka, CA. 105 pp.
  • Egler, F. E. 1934. Communities and successional trends in the vegetation of the Coos Bay sand dunes, Oregon. M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. 39 pp.
  • Kagan, J. S., E. M. Nielsen, M. D. Noone, J. C. van Warmerdam, L. K. Wise, G. Kittel, and C. Copass. 2012. Lewis and Clark National Historic Park vegetation classification and mapping project report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR--2012/597. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
  • Kumler, M. L. 1969. Plant succession on the sand dunes of the Oregon coast. Ecology 50:695-704.
  • WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Wiedemann, A. M. 1984. The ecology of Pacific Northwest coastal sand dunes: A community profile. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/OBS-84/04. 130 pp.
  • Wiedemann, A. M. 1990. The coastal parabola dune system at Sand Lake, Tillamook County, Oregon, U.S.A. Proceedings of the Canadian Symposium on Coastal Sand Dunes 1990:171-194.
  • Wiedemann, A. M. 1993. Dry coastal ecosystems of northwestern North America. Pages 341-358 in: E. van der Maarel, editor. Ecosystems of the World 2B: Dry Coastal Ecosystems - Africa, America, Asia and Oceania. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.