Print Report

CEGL007232 Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovata, carolinae-septentrionalis) / Cercis canadensis Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: White Oak - Northern Red Oak - (Shagbark Hickory, Southern Shagbark Hickory) / Eastern Redbud Forest

Colloquial Name: Piedmont Dry-Mesic Basic Oak - Hickory Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This dry-mesic forest occurs on base-rich, well-drained soils in the southern Piedmont. Stands are dominated by Quercus alba and often Quercus rubra, Carya ovata, or Carya carolinae-septentrionalis in combination with other species of Quercus and Carya (i.e., Quercus velutina, Carya tomentosa, Carya glabra). Other overstory and understory species that may occur include Fraxinus americana, Liquidambar styraciflua, Carya ovalis, Liriodendron tulipifera, Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana, Cercis canadensis, Cornus florida, Viburnum rafinesqueanum, Viburnum prunifolium, Ostrya virginiana, Chionanthus virginicus, Ulmus americana, Carpinus caroliniana, Pinus taeda, and Pinus echinata. Proportions of Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer rubrum, and Pinus spp. increase following disturbance. Herbaceous species and vines that may occur within this community include Desmodium nudiflorum, Galium circaezans, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Polygonatum biflorum var. biflorum, Uvularia perfoliata, Aristolochia serpentaria, Scleria oligantha, Botrychium virginianum, Agrimonia rostellata, Bromus pubescens, Carex albicans, Carex laxiflora var. laxiflora, Carex planispicata, Dichanthelium boscii, Elymus hystrix var. hystrix, Festuca subverticillata, Scutellaria elliptica, and Tiarella cordifolia var. collina. Other stands have high cover of scrambling vines, such Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Bignonia capreolata, and Vitis rotundifolia, that preclude a diversity of herbaceous species.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association was renamed and merged with Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya glabra - Carya ovata / Viburnum rafinesqueanum / Viola tripartita Forest (CEGL007236) in February 2007. This association is differentiated from non-basic oak-hickory forests by lacking such species as Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium tenellum, Oxydendrum arboreum, and most other members of the Ericaceae. In addition, Quercus falcata, Nyssa sylvatica, and Ilex opaca tend to be much less abundant or absent. Fraxinus americana, Carya spp., Acer leucoderme, Cercis canadensis, and Viburnum spp. are much more abundant. This forest is not found in Kentucky or Tennessee. See ~Quercus alba - Carya tomentosa - (Quercus velutina) / Desmodium nudiflorum - (Carex picta) Forest (CEGL007795)$$ for related vegetation of these states in the Interior Low Plateau. Also compare to ~Quercus rubra - Quercus alba - Carya glabra / Geranium maculatum Forest (CEGL007237)$$ and ~Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya tomentosa / Vaccinium stamineum / Desmodium nudiflorum Piedmont Forest (CEGL008475)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands of this forest are dominated by Quercus alba and often Quercus rubra, Carya ovata, and Carya carolinae-septentrionalis in combination with other species of Quercus and Carya (i.e., Quercus velutina, Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Carya glabra). Other overstory and understory species that may occur include Liquidambar styraciflua, Carya ovalis, Fraxinus americana, Liriodendron tulipifera, Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana, Cercis canadensis, Cornus florida, Viburnum rafinesqueanum, Viburnum prunifolium, Ostrya virginiana, Chionanthus virginicus, Ulmus americana, Carpinus caroliniana, Pinus taeda, and Pinus echinata. Acer leucoderme is an important understory component in some Georgia Piedmont stands. Proportions of Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer rubrum, and Pinus spp. increase following disturbance. Occurrences usually have closed canopies and moderately well-developed subcanopy and shrub layers. Herbaceous cover in this association may vary considerably with site conditions, land-use history, and levels of deer herbivory. Some stands have rather sparse herb layers with <25% total cover and only scattered patches of dry-mesophytic forbs and graminoids such as Desmodium nudiflorum, Galium circaezans, Maianthemum racemosum ssp. racemosum, Polygonatum biflorum var. biflorum, Uvularia perfoliata, Aristolochia serpentaria, Scleria oligantha, Botrychium virginianum, Agrimonia rostellata, Bromus pubescens, Carex albicans, Carex laxiflora var. laxiflora, Carex planispicata, Dichanthelium boscii, Elymus hystrix var. hystrix, Festuca subverticillata, Scutellaria elliptica, and Tiarella cordifolia var. collina. Other stands have high cover of scrambling vines, such Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Bignonia capreolata, and Vitis rotundifolia, that preclude a diversity of herbaceous species. On the best sites, especially those not subject to heavy deer grazing, stands may have well-developed herb layers with >50% cover and impressive species richness (e.g., >80 taxa per 400 m2). A number of species with Piedmont distributions restricted to calcium- or magnesium-rich soils have been documented in this association in both Virginia and North Carolina, including Blephilia ciliata, Clematis ochroleuca, Matelea decipiens, Matelea obliqua, Polygala senega, Ruellia purshiana, Salvia urticifolia, Scutellaria nervosa, Scutellaria ovata, Scutellaria serrata, and Triosteum angustifolium.

Dynamics:  This community is not regarded as a fire-adapted type, but as in other oak-dominated forests, periodic light fire may be important for maintaining oak dominance over more shade-tolerant hardwoods. Periodic light fire would not alter the composition of the canopy but would reduce subcanopy and shrub cover and promote more herb growth. Natural tree replacement occurs on a tree-by-tree basis. This is a climax community and can be expected to maintain dominance on a site in the absence of catastrophic disturbance.

Environmental Description:  This dry-mesic forest occurs on base-rich, well-drained soils in the southern Piedmont. It is typically associated with sites underlain by diabase, amphibolite, gabbro, basalt, and other mafic rocks. It commonly occurs on mid- to low slopes where conditions are somewhat ameliorated over upper slopes, i.e., in dry-mesic as opposed to dry conditions, but it can occur in most topographic positions with basic soils that are well-drained. Soils generally are in the order Alfisol and have moderately high to high levels of calcium, magnesium, manganese, iron, and aluminum. However, the abundant iron and aluminum tend to lower pH into the strongly acidic range; e.g., the mean pH of samples collected from 16 Virginia plots was 5.3.

Geographic Range: This forest occurs in the Piedmont of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. In Virginia, there is a rare Inner Coastal Plain occurrence (New Kent County) on a slope with outcrops of hard shell concretions.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, GA, NC, SC, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya glabra - Carya ovata / Viburnum rafinesquianum / Viola tripartita Forest (CEGL007236) merged into this type (CEGL007232 ). The two associations were overlapping in concept and were merged

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Quercus alba - Carya alba - Carya ovata / Cercis canadensis (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovata, cordiformis) / Cercis canadensis / Ruellia purshiana Forest (Fleming 2002a)
? Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovata, cordiformis) / Cercis canadensis var. canadensis / Ruellia purshiana Forest (Fleming pers. comm.)
= Ulmus rubra - Liriodendron tulipifera - Carya cordiformis / Cercis canadensis - Cornus florida / Brachyelytrum erectum var. erectum - Dichanthelium boscii - Carex albicans Forest (Walton et al. 2001)
< IA6j. Interior Calcareous Oak - Hickory Forest (Allard 1990)
< Permesotrophic Forest (Rawinski 1992)
? White Oak (54) (USFS 1988)
? White Oak - Black Oak - Northern Red Oak (53) (USFS 1988)
< White Oak - Black Oak - Northern Red Oak: 52 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): S. Landaal

Author of Description: S. Landaal and G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-15-07

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002a. Ecological communities of the Bull Run Mountains, Virginia: Baseline vegetation and floristic data for conservation planning and natural area stewardship. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 274 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, Gary P. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
  • Golden, M. S. 1979. Forest vegetation of the lower Alabama Piedmont. Ecology 60:770-782.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping at Appomattox Court House National Historical Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/125. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Peet, R. K., and N. L. Christensen. 1980. Hardwood forest vegetation of the North Carolina Piedmont. Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel 68:14-39.
  • Rawinski, T. J. 1992. A classification of Virginia''s indigenous biotic communities: Vegetated terrestrial, palustrine, and estuarine community classes. Unpublished document. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report No. 92-21. Richmond, VA. 25 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1988. Silvicultural examination and prescription field book. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. Atlanta, GA. 35 pp.
  • Walton, D. P., P. P. Coulling, J. Weber, A. Belden, Jr., and A. C. Chazal. 2001. A plant community classification and natural heritage inventory of the Pamunkey River floodplain. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01-19. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 200 pp. plus appendices.