Print Report

CEGL006199 Thuja occidentalis - Acer rubrum / Cornus sericea Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern White-cedar - Red Maple / Red-osier Dogwood Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Northern White-cedar - Red Maple Enriched Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This mixed swamp of the northeastern United States occurs on enriched substrates that favor the growth of Thuja occidentalis. It is generally in alluvial settings, but those that are subject to short periods of flooding. They are usually found in areas of calcareous bedrock. The closed canopy overtops a conspicuous shrub layer. Herbs are patchy and may be locally dense, especially on hummocks. The hummock-and-hollow topography limits most bryophyte growth to the hummocks, since hollows are often flooded. The canopy dominants are Thuja occidentalis and Acer rubrum. Associated tree species include Fraxinus nigra, Betula alleghaniensis, Betula papyrifera, Pinus strobus, Picea mariana, Larix laricina, Abies balsamea, Ulmus rubra, and Ulmus americana. Dominant shrubs include Cornus sericea, Cornus amomum, Rhamnus alnifolia, Toxicodendron vernix, Alnus spp., and Ilex verticillata, plus Viburnum nudum, Ledum groenlandicum, and Vaccinium corymbosum less frequently. Ferns are characteristic in the herb layer, and include Onoclea sensibilis, Thelypteris palustris, Osmunda cinnamomea, and Osmunda regalis. Common herbs include Carex stipata, Carex intumescens, Carex pedunculata, Amphicarpaea bracteata, Chelone glabra, Lysimachia thyrsiflora, Lycopus virginicus, Aralia nudicaulis, Glyceria striata, Mitella nuda, Cornus canadensis, Thalictrum pubescens, and Coptis trifolia. Related northern white-cedar swamp associations lack a prominent deciduous component (~Thuja occidentalis / Sphagnum (girgensohnii, warnstorfii) Swamp Forest (CEGL006007)$$), or are on deeper peats and have more open canopies (~Thuja occidentalis - Abies balsamea / Ledum groenlandicum / Carex trisperma Swamp Woodland (CEGL006507)$$).

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The closed canopy overtops a conspicuous shrub layer. Herbs are patchy and may be locally dense, especially on hummocks. The hummock-and-hollow topography limits most bryophyte growth to the hummocks, since hollows are often flooded. The canopy dominants are Thuja occidentalis and Acer rubrum. Associated tree species include Fraxinus nigra, Betula alleghaniensis, Betula papyrifera, Pinus strobus, Picea mariana, Larix laricina, Abies balsamea, Ulmus rubra, and Ulmus americana. Dominant shrubs include Cornus sericea (= Cornus stolonifera), Cornus amomum, Rhamnus alnifolia, Toxicodendron vernix, Alnus spp., and Ilex verticillata, plus Viburnum nudum, Ledum groenlandicum, and Vaccinium corymbosum less frequently. Ferns are characteristic in the herb layer, and include Onoclea sensibilis, Thelypteris palustris, Osmunda cinnamomea, and Osmunda regalis. Common herbs include Carex stipata, Carex intumescens, Carex pedunculata, Amphicarpaea bracteata, Chelone glabra, Lysimachia thyrsiflora, Lycopus virginicus, Aralia nudicaulis, Glyceria striata, Mitella nuda, Cornus canadensis, Thalictrum pubescens, and Coptis trifolia.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This mixed swamp of the northeastern United States occurs on enriched substrates that favor the growth of Thuja occidentalis. It is generally in alluvial settings, but those that are subject to short periods of flooding. They are usually found in areas of calcareous bedrock.

Geographic Range: No Data Available

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  ME?, MI, NB, NH, NY?, ON, VT




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: The type 5002 can be treated as a variant of 6199.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Northern White-Cedar: 37 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): Northern Appalachian Planning Team

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-27-03

  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.