Print Report

CEGL006220 Acer rubrum / Ilex mucronata - Vaccinium corymbosum Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Maple / Catberry - Highbush Blueberry Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Northern Red Maple Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forested red maple swamp of stream drainages and wetland borders occurs in northern to central New England and New York, extending sporadically south to New Jersey. The hydrologic regime is variable among occurrences, generally influenced by seasonal flooding and often limited groundwater seepage. This association may occur in basins with little drainage, or on stream floodplains that remain saturated throughout most of the growing season. Soils vary according to setting; generally the substrate is mineral soil, acidic to weakly minerotrophic, but in some settings organic soil may be well-developed. The deciduous canopy ranges from closed to patchy, but the overall cover is that of a closed-canopy forest. The shrub layer, particularly in openings, is generally well-developed. The herb layer is usually fairly well-developed and may be extensive. The canopy is characteristically dominated by Acer rubrum with associates of Fraxinus nigra, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Betula alleghaniensis, and Ulmus americana. Tsuga canadensis, Picea rubens, and Abies balsamea, while not abundant, characterize this association as one of cooler climates. (The Picea and Abies drop out in the southernmost occurrences of this type.) Typical shrubs include Vaccinium corymbosum (often dominant), Ilex verticillata, Ilex mucronata, Lindera benzoin, Rosa palustris, Alnus incana, Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides, and Viburnum recognitum. There is north-to-south variability in the shrub component as well, with Ilex mucronata characteristic of all but the southernmost occurrences, and Lindera absent from more northerly occurrences. The herbaceous layer is often dominated by ferns, including Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmunda regalis, and Osmunda claytoniana. Onoclea sensibilis, Dryopteris cristata, and Thelypteris palustris are often present, though less abundant. Carex stricta may be locally dominant. Other species frequent in the herbaceous layer include Impatiens capensis, Caltha palustris, Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex intumescens, Carex trisperma, and Arisaema triphyllum. The bryophyte flora is not well documented; Sphagnum spp. and Mnium spp. are frequent, although not necessarily abundant. ~Acer rubrum - Fraxinus (pennsylvanica, americana) / Lindera benzoin / Symplocarpus foetidus Swamp Forest (CEGL006406)$$ is distinguished by its greater abundance and extent of seepage indicators and its lacks lack of northern species such as Picea rubens, Abies balsamea, and Ilex mucronata. ~Acer rubrum / Carex stricta - Onoclea sensibilis Wet Woodland (CEGL006119)$$ is also similar but has a more open canopy and typically a graminoid-dominated herbaceous layer. This association is also related to ~Acer rubrum - Prunus serotina / Cornus amomum Floodplain Forest (CEGL006503)$$, which occurs along floodplains of major streams and minor rivers. While both can be dominated by red maple in the canopy, the understory vegetation differs somewhat, with species more typical of floodplains (Carpinus caroliniana, Cornus amomum, Prunus serotina) in that type, and species typical of more constantly saturated conditions in this type.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: A continuum of Northern Appalachian acidic swamps, with very similar floristics, is expressed through three associations: the coniferous ~Picea rubens - Abies balsamea / Gaultheria hispidula / Osmunda cinnamomea / Sphagnum spp. Swamp Forest (CEGL006312)$$, the mixed ~Picea rubens - Acer rubrum / Ilex mucronata Swamp Forest (CEGL006198)$$, and the present type (deciduous), with all gradations of coniferous to deciduous evident.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The deciduous canopy ranges from closed to patchy, but the overall cover is that of a closed-canopy forest. The shrub layer, particularly in openings, is generally well-developed. The herb layer is usually fairly well-developed and may be extensive. The canopy is characteristically dominated by Acer rubrum with associates of Fraxinus nigra, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Betula alleghaniensis, and Ulmus americana. Tsuga canadensis, Picea rubens, and Abies balsamea, while not abundant, characterize this association as one of cooler climates. (The Picea and Abies drop out in the southernmost occurrences of this type.) Typical shrubs include Vaccinium corymbosum (often dominant), Ilex verticillata, Ilex mucronata (= Nemopanthus mucronatus), Lindera benzoin, Rosa palustris, Alnus incana, Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides, and Viburnum recognitum. There is north-to-south variability in the shrub component as well, with Ilex mucronata characteristic of all but the southernmost occurrences, and Lindera absent from more northerly occurrences. The herbaceous layer is often dominated by ferns, including Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmunda regalis, and Osmunda claytoniana. Onoclea sensibilis, Dryopteris cristata, and Thelypteris palustris are often present, though less abundant. Carex stricta may be locally dominant. Other species frequent in the herbaceous layer include Impatiens capensis, Caltha palustris, Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex intumescens, Carex trisperma, and Arisaema triphyllum. The bryophyte flora is not well-documented; Sphagnum spp. and Mnium spp. are frequent, although not necessarily abundant.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This forested red maple swamp occupies stream drainages and wetland borders. The hydrologic regime is variable among occurrences, generally influenced both by groundwater seepage and seasonal flooding. This association may occur in basins with little drainage, or on stream floodplains that remain saturated throughout most of the growing season. Soils vary according to setting; generally the substrate is mineral soil, acidic to (less commonly) circumneutral, but in some settings organic soil may be well-developed.

Geographic Range: This forest of stream drainages and wetland borders occurs from northern New England south sporadically to northern New Jersey.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MA?, ME?, NB?, NH?, NJ, NY, PA, QC?, VT?




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? NNE Acidic Seepage Swamp (Rawinski 1984a)
? Northern red maple swamp (NAP pers. comm. 1998)
= Red Maple - Sphagnum Basin Swamp (Sperduto and Nichols 2004)
< Red Maple: 108 (Eyre 1980)
? Seasonally flooded basin swamps (Zone I) (Golet et al. 1993)
? Southern New England acidic seepage swamp, black ash swamp (Rawinski 1984a)

Concept Author(s): D.D. Sperduto and W.F. Nichols (2004)

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler and S.L. Neid

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-20-06

  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Golet, F. C., A. J. K. Calhoun, W. R. DeRagon, D. J. Lowry, and A. J. Gold. 1993. Ecology of red maple swamps in the glaciated Northeast: A community profile. USDI Fish & Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 151 pp.
  • Lubinski, S., K. Hop, and S. Gawler. 2003. Vegetation Mapping Program: Acadia National Park, Maine. Report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, and Maine Natural Areas Program in conjunction with M. Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program, and K. Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator), USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and NatureServe. [http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/ftp/vegmapping/acad/reports/acadrpt.pdf]
  • NAP [Northern Appalachian-Boreal Forest Working Group]. 1998. Northern Appalachian-Boreal Working group discussions. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, E. Eastman, L. A. Sneddon, and S. C. Gawler. 2007. Classification and mapping of vegetation and fire fuel models at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2007/076. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 2 volumes.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.
  • Zika, P. F., and K. T. Dann. 1985. Rare plants on ultramafic soils in Vermont. Rhodora 87:293-304.