Print Report

CEGL002099 Quercus michauxii - Quercus shumardii - Liquidambar styraciflua / Arundinaria gigantea Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Swamp Chestnut Oak - Shumard Oak - Sweetgum / Giant Cane Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Swamp Chestnut Oak - Sweetgum Mesic Floodplain Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This swamp chestnut oak - hardwood forest is a bottomland community found in the central and south-central United States along borders and first bottoms of rivers, streams, and swamps, particularly along the Mississippi River, Ohio River, Tennessee River and their tributaries. Soils which support this association are deep, moist, rich, loamy, typically somewhat acidic to circumneutral, and well-drained. Short periods of inundation in the fall and winter can occur. Canopy diversity can be high in this community. Stands are typically dominated by Quercus michauxii, Quercus shumardii, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Carya laciniosa. Other hickories which can be present include Carya ovata and Carya tomentosa. Canopy closure is at or near 100%. The subcanopy is dense and dominated by Carpinus caroliniana and Ulmus alata. Dominant shrubs include Ilex decidua, Cornus foemina, and Viburnum dentatum. The herbaceous layer is dense and dominated by Carex spp. and a diverse and varied assemblage of grasses and forbs, including Arundinaria gigantea which often forms dense, almost impenetrable stands particularly where canopy openings allow sunlight to reach the forest floor. Vines are prevalent in the subcanopy and understory of this community; the most commonly encountered are Toxicodendron radicans, Campsis radicans, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Distribution of this association in the Midwest needs further assessment. In Kentucky, the type is known from the Peal Wildlife Management Area, Ballard County, in the Upper East Gulf Coastal Plain, where it occurs adjacent to cypress sloughs and swamps. Examples occur on Macon Ridge, Louisiana. Quercus shumardii produces large quantities of acorns, but germination is low and regeneration is subsequently poor. As a result of these characteristics, Quercus shumardii may be absent from much of its original range. In such cases Quercus michauxii and Quercus pagoda are often the dominant oaks in this community type. The presence of only a few Quercus shumardii individuals may warrant its inclusion in this element. Careful consideration of past disturbance must be considered when determining the classification status of this natural community. Stands in the Bankhead National Forest of Alabama may occur on limestone-derived soils. ~Quercus laurifolia - Quercus michauxii - Liquidambar styraciflua / Carpinus caroliniana Floodplain Forest (CEGL004678)$$ represents equivalent vegetation in the Atlantic Coastal Plain which is not otherwise included here.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Structural variation in this community is subject to the duration and depth of flooding and soil physical properties. Understory, shrub, herbaceous, and vine layers can be dense, especially when flooding is minimal or in response to canopy openings. Basal area values range from 25-35 m2/ha.

Floristics: This is a floodplain forest dominated by broad-leaved deciduous trees. Although canopy diversity can be high, this community is dominated by Quercus michauxii, Quercus shumardii, Liquidambar styraciflua, and sometimes Carya laciniosa. If Quercus pagoda is not a component of this type, that would restrict its range to regions to the interior and north of the Coastal Plain, but this was not the original intent. Quercus pagoda may be present in the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain, but will be rare or absent in stands outside of the Coastal Plain (e.g., Interior Low Plateau, Ozarks). Trees exhibit good growth and attain heights in excess of 30 m (up to 60 m for Quercus shumardii), with straight, thick trunks which are clear of branches for nearly two-thirds of their height. Canopy closure is at or near 100%. The subcanopy is dense and dominated by Carpinus caroliniana and Ulmus alata. Dominant shrubs include Ilex decidua, Cornus foemina, and Viburnum dentatum. The herbaceous layer is dense and dominated by Carex spp. and a diverse and varied assemblage of grasses and forbs, including Arundinaria gigantea, which often forms dense, almost impenetrable stands particularly where canopy openings allow sunlight to reach the forest floor. Vines are prevalent in the subcanopy and understory of this community; the most commonly encountered are Toxicodendron radicans, Campsis radicans, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia (TNC 1995a). In the southern Cumberland Plateau of northern Alabama, the community is found on limestone-derived soils. The midstory stratum is dominated by Ulmus rubra, Acer floridanum (= Acer barbatum) and Carpinus caroliniana. Also in this area, Aesculus pavia is a characteristic species of the understory, in addition to scattered dense patches of Arundinaria gigantea.

Species variability and physiognomic differences within and among occurrences of this type are directly related to the duration and depth of seasonal flooding, soil physical properties, and the amount of light penetrating the tree canopy. Considerable variability in species composition is possible within and among occurrences of this natural community throughout its range. This variability is a result of hydrologic influences, particularly the duration and depth of seasonal flooding. Historically, giant cane was much more prevalent. In southern Illinois, Public Land Survey notes mention dense stands of this species, and Theodore Roosevelt describes canebrakes stretching for miles and so dense as to choke out other plants.

Dynamics:  Natural disturbances which may affect this type include flooding, wind, and storm damage. It is subject to infrequent, short-duration, shallow flooding (<1.5 m). Seasonal flooding (early winter and late spring) contributes nutrients and sediments to this dynamic and productive ecosystem. Occasional prolonged flooding can stress canopy species, especially pecan and sugarberry, and silver maple can become more prevalent under these conditions.

Environmental Description:  Key environmental factors include deep, rich alluvial soils, periodic flooding, and water near the surface during most of the year. Stands occur on level or nearly level to gently sloping soils that formed in alluvium on floodplains. They are subject to infrequent, short-duration, shallow flooding (<1.5 m). Seasonal flooding (early winter and late spring) contributes nutrients and sediments to this dynamic and productive ecosystem. Soils are deep, medium-textured, typically with a somewhat acidic or circumneutral pH. Ponding of water may occur where impermeable clay layers are present. Soils can be sandy on terraces and first bottoms. Soil information in Illinois was collected from site-specific field analysis completed by the USDA-Soil Conservation Service and USDA-County Soil Surveys.

Soils which support this natural community include dominantly level or nearly level to gently sloping soils that formed in alluvium on floodplains. These soils are deep, medium-textured, and have adequate or excessive moisture available for vegetation during the growing season. They have a udic or aquic moisture regime, a thermic temperate regime, and montmorillonitic or mixed mineralogy. Soils are Aquepts, Aqualfs, Aquents, Udolls, and Udalfs. Haplaquepts, Ochraqualfs, Fluvaquents, Natraqualfs, Ochraqualfs, and Hapludalfs are found in backswamp areas and older natural levees. Dystrochrepts, Udifluvents, and Fluvaquents occur in smaller areas. Soils Associations which would support this community in southern Illinois include Belknap-Wakeland, Darwin-Medway-Cairo, Jacob-Booker, Ginat-Weinbach-Sciotoville, Armiesburg-Emma, and Belknap-Bonnie-Cape. Bedrock is deeply buried (>175 cm) and consists of Paleozoic deposits and stratified Cenozoic marine deposits. Shale or sandstone bedrock can occur at about 170 cm.

Geographic Range: This community can occur on bottomlands and along streams and the borders of swamps in the Mississippi, Ohio and Tennessee river valleys from central Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi, to west-central Tennessee, northern Alabama, western Kentucky, southern Missouri, southern Illinois, and extreme southwestern Indiana. Distribution of this association in the Midwest and Cumberlands needs further assessment.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, IL, IN, KY, LA, MO, MS, OK?, TN




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Liquidambar styraciflua - Ulmus americana lower slope - shallow floodplain type (Robertson et al. 1984)
= Quercus - Carya / Hymenocallis community (Voigt and Mohlenbrock 1964)
= Quercus michauxii - Quercus shumardii - Liquidambar styraciflua / Arundinaria gigantea Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001)
= Quercus michauxii - Quercus shumardii - Liquidambar styraciflua / Arundinaria gigantea Forest (TNC 1995a)

Concept Author(s): M. Guetersloh

Author of Description: M. Guetersloh, S. Landaal and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-29-06

  • Behler, J. L. 1988. Familiar reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 191 pp.
  • Benyus, J. M. 1989. The field guide to wildlife habitats of the eastern United States. A Fireside Book. Simon and Schuster, Inc. 336 pp.
  • Braun, E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Press, New York. 596 pp.
  • Bull, J., and J. Farrand, Jr. 1977. The Audubon Society field guide to North American birds: Eastern region. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 784 pp.
  • Clark, B. F., and J. G. Hutchinson, editors. 1994. Central hardwood notes. USDA Forest Service: Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Southern Forest Experiment Station.
  • Collingwood, G. H., and W. D. Brush. 1984. Knowing your trees. The American Forestry Association, Washington, DC. 391 pp.
  • Craighead, F. C. 1949. Insect enemies of eastern forests. USDA Miscellaneous Publication No. 657, United States Printing Office, Washington, DC. 679 pp.
  • Duncan, W. H., and M. B. Duncan. 1988. Trees of the southeastern United States. The University of Georgia Press. 322 pp.
  • Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Fralish, J. S. 1988b. Predicting potential stand composition from site characteristics in the Shawnee Hills Forest of Illinois. The American Midland Naturalist 120(1):79-101.
  • Little, E. L. 1980a. The Audubon Society field guide to North American trees: Eastern region. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 714 pp.
  • MSNHP [Mississippi Natural Heritage Program]. 2006. Ecological communities of Mississippi. Museum of Natural Science, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Jackson, MS. 9 pp.
  • McKnight, J. S., D. D. Hook, O. G. Langdon, and R. L. Johnson. 1981. Flood tolerance and related characteristics of trees of the bottomland forests of the southern U.S. Pages 29-69 in: J. R. Clark and J. Benforado, editors. Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York.
  • Miller, R. B., and L. R. Tehon. 1929. The native and naturalized trees of Illinois. Volume XVIII, Article I. State of Illinois Department of Registration and Education, Division of the Natural History Survey, Urbana. 339 pp.
  • Mohlenbrock, R. H. 1986. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 507 pp.
  • Mohlenbrock, R. H., and J. W. Voigt. 1959. A flora of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 390 pp.
  • Nelson, P. 2010. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Revised edition. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Niering, W. A. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American wildflowers: Eastern region. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 887 pp.
  • Nordman, C., M. Russo, and L. Smart. 2011. Vegetation types of the Natchez Trace Parkway, based on the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe Central Databases (International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications). Arlington, VA. Data current as of 11 April 2011. 548 pp.
  • Platt, S. G., and C. G. Brantley. 1993. Switchcane: Propagation and establishment in the southeastern United States. Restoration and Management Notes 11(2):135-137.
  • Powell, J. W. 1985. Physiographic regions of the United States, National Geographic Society. Monograph 3. Pages 65-100.
  • Robertson, P. A., M. D. MacKenzie, and L. F. Elliott. 1984. Gradient analysis and classification of the woody vegetation for four sites in southern Illinois and adjacent Missouri. Vegetatio 58:87-104.
  • SAF [Society of American Foresters]. 1967. Forest cover types of North America. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 67 pp.
  • Salas, D. E., T. Folts-Zettner, R. W. Sanders, and J. Drake. 2010c. Vegetation classification and mapping at Chickasaw National Recreation Area. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR--2010/286. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 176 pp.
  • Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1959. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press and Missouri Conservation Commission. 341 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • TDNH [Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage]. 2018. Unpublished data. Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage, Nashville, TN.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1995a. A classification and description of plant communities in southern Illinois. Report by the Southern Illinois Field Office, Ullin, IL, and the Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Thornbury, W. D. 1965. Regional geomorphology of the United States. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 609 pp.
  • Voigt, J. W., and R. H. Mohlenbrock. 1964. Plant communities of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 202 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H., W. M. Kitchens, E. C. Pendleton, and T. W. Sipe. 1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. FWS/OBS-81/37. Washington, DC.
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.