Print Report

CEGL000240 Abies concolor - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Acer glabrum Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: White Fir - Douglas-fir / Rocky Mountain Maple Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This white fir forest association ranges from southern and central Utah and southern Colorado to northern New Mexico and central Arizona and is found between 2073 and 3140 m (6800-10,300 feet) elevation. This forest shows great variety with respect to topographic characteristics. In southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, it is one of the most widespread mixed conifer forests. Though it frequently occurs on moderate to steep north- and northwest-facing slopes, other slope aspects are represented. When found on southern aspects, this forest is at higher elevations or streamside settings. Predominantly found on lower slopes, it has also been located on mid- and upper slopes. Sites can have high amounts of exposed rock (up to 50% or more cover), with abundant leaf litter and coarse woody debris. The overstory is highly complex and has high variability. Abies concolor dominates or codominates, if not in the overstory, then as regeneration. Pseudotsuga menziesii is a successional dominant and remains a codominant in late-successional stands, becoming minor in very old stands. Picea pungens and Pinus flexilis may be important, as well as Pinus strobiformis at lower latitudes. Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii may occur in frost pockets as regeneration or occasional mature trees, but they are minor and almost always are under severe competition from dense regeneration and canopy dominance of Abies concolor and Pseudotsuga menziesii. The open to dense tall-shrub layer dominates the undergrowth with Acer glabrum and often Amelanchier alnifolia. If present, Quercus gambelii has low cover (<5%). Common low-growing shrubs are Holodiscus dumosus, and Jamesia americana, which occur on cobbly substrates, along with Mahonia repens, Paxistima myrsinites, Physocarpus monogynus, and Symphoricarpos oreophilus; however, some stands have an open shrub of layer of Acer glabrum and little else in the understory. The herb layer species are typically low in cover value.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Complex overstory where Abies concolor and Pseudotsuga menziesii codominate; Picea pungens and Pinus flexilis may or may not be important, Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica and Picea engelmannii occur in frost pockets, Pinus ponderosa is accidental, and Populus tremuloides is a major seral dominant. The shrub component usually exhibits two layers. The tall-shrub layer, which includes Acer glabrum, is diagnostic of this plant association. The low-shrub layer is variable, and a high coverage of a particular species may indicate a phase, e.g., Mahonia repens, Holodiscus dumosus. Low shrubs and herbaceous species comprise the ground cover.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: On steep rocky slopes Jamesia americana and Holodiscus dumosus become more abundant and this type transitions to scree associations such as ~Abies concolor - (Pseudotsuga menziesii) / Jamesia americana - Holodiscus dumosus Scree Woodland (CEGL000890)$$. According to Alexander et al. (1987), this type represents a transition from the Abies concolor / Quercus gambelii type to types representative of spruce-fir forests. This type appears to be related to the Pseudotsuga menziesii / Paxistima myrsinites habitat type of central and northern Colorado of Hoffman and Alexander (1980). The foothill ravine forest community of Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado (Peet 1981), is weakly related to this association, as is the Abies grandis / Acer glabrum habitat type of central Idaho (Steele et al. 1981). The Abies concolor / Acer glabrum / Berberis nervosa Plant Association (Atzet and McCrimmon 1990) found in southern Oregon Cascades is not part of this association.

Stuever and Hayden (1997a) identify four phases: (1) Typic Phase: Widespread throughout Arizona and New Mexico; specifically noted in Mogollon, Tularosa, San Mateo, Zuni, Sandia and Manzano mountains; and San Juan Mountains of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. Tree species mix of Abies concolor and Pseudotsuga menziesii; dominated by Acer glabrum in shrub layer; Quercus gambelii is usually absent (sometimes minor); graminoids >25%; forbs are typically diverse in species and variable in coverage (Alexander et al. 1987). (2) Mahonia repens Phase: Known from the San Mateo, Zuni, Sandia and Manzano mountains and other mountains of northern New Mexico with an outlier in the White Mountains of Arizona. tree species mix shown above in overstory; less Acer glabrum than typic phase and more Quercus gambelii but not exceeding 5% cover, Mahonia repens is always present at 1-10% cover, Bromus ciliatus is present; forbs dominate the site with Clematis ligusticifolia abundant (>25% cover) (Alexander et al. 1987). (3) Holodiscus dumosus Phase: Known from mountains of southern New Mexico (Gila and Lincoln National Forests, especially the Sacramento, Mogollon, Chiricahua, and Pinaleno mountains) where it occurs on cool, wet sites on west- to north-facing canyon sides and slopes, and upper elevation ridges and knolls. Acer glabrum and Holodiscus dumosus are always present; Quercus gambelii may be present but having low coverage values; Bromus ciliatus is common grass; forbs vary and can be of sufficient abundance to cover large percentage of the site; Mahonia repens is usually lacking in this phase (Alexander et al. 1984a). (4) Riparian Phase: Known from the San Mateo, Zuni, Sandia and Manzano mountains, Abies concolor is the only coniferous tree in the overstory. There is usually a high shrub cover, and the site is restricted to streamside canyon bottoms. Acer glabrum with >50% cover, Jamesia americana >25%, Symphoricarpos oreophilus >25%, Quercus gambelii variable but not exceeding 5% (Alexander et al. 1987).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The moderately open to closed overstory is highly complex and has high variability. Abies concolor dominates or codominates, if not in the overstory, then as regeneration. Pseudotsuga menziesii is a successional dominant and remains a codominant in late-successional stands, becoming minor in very old stands. Picea pungens, Pinus longaeva, Pinus flexilis, and Juniperus scopulorum may be important, as well as Pinus strobiformis at lower latitudes. Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii may occur in frost pockets as regeneration or occasional mature trees, but they are minor and almost always are under severe competition from dense regeneration and canopy dominance of Abies concolor and Pseudotsuga menziesii (Moir and Ludwig 1979). Pinus ponderosa is an accidental or minor species, since neither regeneration nor mature trees are important in late-successional stands (Moir and Ludwig 1979). Seral stands are often codominated by Populus tremuloides (Stuever and Hayden 1997a). The tall-shrub layer dominates the undergrowth typically dominated or codominated by Acer glabrum or less frequently Amelanchier alnifolia. Quercus gambelii, if present, has relatively low cover (<5%). Other short and dwarf-shrubs may be present with low cover, such as Holodiscus dumosus and Jamesia americana, which occur on cobbly substrates, along with Acer grandidentatum, Juniperus communis, Mahonia repens (= Berberis repens), Paxistima myrsinites, Physocarpus monogynus, Rosa woodsii, Shepherdia canadensis, and Symphoricarpos oreophilus; however, some stands have an open shrub of layer of Acer glabrum and little else. Herb layer species are typically low in cover. Common species are Artemisia franserioides, Bromus anomalus, Bromus ciliatus, Carex spp., Erigeron spp., Lathyrus spp., Maianthemum racemosum, Penstemon spp., Pyrola chlorantha, Solidago velutina, Stellaria longifolia, Thalictrum fendleri, and Viola canadensis.

Alexander et al. (1987) describe a Holodiscus dumosus phase for this type. This phase is the only form in which this association occurs on the Lincoln National Forest, and is characterized by the presence of Holodiscus dumosus. Alexander et al. (1987) describe three phases for this type in the Cibola National Forest of New Mexico. The first, an Acer glabrum typic phase found from 2440-2895 m (8000-9500 feet) on north ridges at high elevations and in cool drainages at lower elevations, shows the expected characteristics for the type. The second phase, a riparian phase found from 2290-2500 m (7500-8200 feet), is distinguished by the absence of conifers, other than Abies concolor, in the overstory, as well as high shrub cover and restriction to streamside canyon bottoms. This phase can occur in canyons bisecting warm, south exposures, if conditions are moist and shady. The third phase, Mahonia repens phase found from 2470-3140 m (8100-10,300 feet) on north ridge sideslopes as well as cool moist microsites at lower elevations, has less Acer glabrum and more Quercus gambelii than that of the typic phase.

Moir and Ludwig (1979) describe two phases. The first, a Mahonia repens phase found between 2710-2925 m (8900-9600) feet on east-, south-, or west-facing canyon sideslopes, on gentle north-facing mesatops at 2800-2865 m (9200-9400 feet), and extending down streamsides to 2350 m (7700 feet), features Mahonia repens in the low-shrub layer, as well as Paxistima myrsinites. The Mahonia repens phase is found in the northern forests of the region, in the mountains of northern New Mexico, with an outlier in the White Mountains of Arizona. The second phase, a Holodiscus dumosus phase occurring between 2400-2895 m (7900-9500 feet) on moderate to steep canyon sideslopes of east and northwest exposures, at higher elevations when found on south-facing slopes between 2865-3050 m (9400-10,000 feet), and extending along streamsides down to about 2070 m (6800 feet), lacks Mahonia, and is found in the southern forests, in the Sacramento, Mogollon, Chiricahua, and Pinaleno mountains.

At upper elevations, this type forms ecotones with spruce-fir types. The Abies concolor / Acer glabrum forms a lower elevation limit of many subalpine species (DeVelice et al. 1986). In more mesic areas, this type intergrades to the Abies concolor / Erigeron eximius type, and into the Abies lasiocarpa / Rubus parviflorus and Abies concolor / Acer grandidentatum types in cool wet drainages where conditions are especially moist (Fitzhugh et al. 1987). In more xeric locations, this type grades to the Abies concolor / Mahonia repens and Abies concolor / Quercus gambelii types, and the Pseudotsuga menziesii / Holodiscus dumosus (Scree) type on drier south-facing slopes. Lower slopes support Picea pungens - Pseudotsuga menziesii stands.

Dynamics:  Because of the cool, moist conditions characteristic of this habitat type, fires are mostly light, erratic, and infrequent (Moir and Ludwig 1979). The erratic nature of fires has resulted in mosaics in forest structure within this type (DeVelice et al. 1986). Logging and stand deterioration with increasing age have also contributed to the irregular structure of this type (Alexander et al. 1987).

Crane (1982) places this type in fire group eleven, which are the white fir habitat types. According to Crane, many mixed conifer stands originated following severe wildfires. Fires following lightning strikes during the wet season are variable and frequently remain as surface fires, burning relatively small areas due to the moisture content of the fuels. Such fires kill smaller understory trees, reduce fuels and occasionally flare up to open the canopy. All of these effects help to retain the seral species and thus to maintain the mixed composition and structure of the forests. The most frequent result of fire suppression has been development of dense understories of more shade-tolerant species. Dieterich (1980) gave a composite fire interval of 36 years for a mixed forest in Arizona.

In a generalized forest succession, there will be an initial grass and forb community. Any fire would help maintain a grassland by eliminating regeneration. If Quercus gambelii or Populus tremuloides were in the previous forest stand, they will resprout normally within one to two years. Periodic moderate to severe fires will tend to rejuvenate these stands while excluding conifer regeneration. A single light surface fire could prepare a seedbed for Pinus ponderosa and other conifers. A later surface fire could thin sapling regeneration. A surface fire in the pole stage would preferentially thin the stand, favoring Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii over the slower-growing white fir. It might also thin any aspen and Quercus gambelii. A severe fire would return the stand to the initial grass and forb state. Repeated low surface fires during the development of the stand from the pole stage could result in a mature, open Pinus ponderosa or Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii stand with some understory Abies concolor establishment between fires. Without fire, Abies concolor and Pseudotsuga menziesii will dominate regeneration (Crane 1982).

Other processes which may affect this type are as follows: Pseudotsuga menziesii is subject to windthrow in this association. There may be some spruce budworm activity on the Pseudotsuga menziesii, as well as infection with dwarf mistletoe which can also infect the Abies concolor. Severe fires eliminate dwarf mistletoe when infected stands are destroyed.

Environmental Description:  This montane forest shows great variety with respect to topographic characteristics where it occurs in the southern portion of the southern Rocky Mountains and high plateaus and mountains of the Colorado Plateau, extending north into the Wasatch Range. In southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, it is one of the most widespread mixed conifer forests. It ranges between 2400 and 3140 m (7900-10,300 feet) in elevation in upland canyon and mountain slopes, down to 2100 m (6800 feet) along stream terraces and valley bottoms. In the Wasatch Range in Utah, stands were sampled in canyons between 1850 and 2040 m (6065-6690 feet) elevation. Though it frequently occurs on cool northeast- to northwest-facing slopes, other slope aspects are represented. When found on southern aspects, this forest occurs at higher elevations or in streamside settings (Fitzhugh et al. 1987). Predominantly found on lower slopes, it has also been located on mid and upper slopes of mountain, ridges and canyons (DeVelice et al. 1986). Where it lies at lower elevations, sites will be locally wet and cool. Therefore, it is located along canyonsides and cool drainages, and its presence is most striking in cool drainages where the adjacent communities may be much drier. At upper elevations, this forest occurs along the tops of ridges and knolls (Alexander et al. 1984a).

This association occurs on shallow, even skeletal soils as it is frequently found on steep slopes. Sites can have high amounts of exposed rock (up to 50% or more cover), with abundant leaf litter and coarse woody debris (Alexander et al. 1984a, Youngblood and Mauk 1985). Soils are moderately well-drained sandy loams, loams and clay loams derived from alluvial deposits or sideslope colluvial derived from a variety of parent materials, including Bandelier tuff, rhyolite, sandstone or andesite rocks. Common soil types are Borolls, Boralfs, and Ochrepts. Surface textures are mostly loam with relatively high amounts of exposed rock (Youngblood and Mauk 1985).

Geographic Range: This montane forest is common in the southern portion of the southern Rocky Mountains and ranges from central and southern Utah and southern Colorado to northern New Mexico and central Arizona.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CA?, CO, NM, NV?, UT




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Abies concolor - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Moir and Ludwig 1979) [found in Arizona and New Mexico from 2070-3050 m (6800-10,000 feet).]
= Abies concolor - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Acer glabrum (Johnston 1987)
< Abies concolor / Acer glabrum (Stuever and Hayden 1997a) [Some of the phases are recognized as IVC associations.]
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Forest (Muldavin et al. 2006)
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Fitzhugh et al. 1987) [found in the Apache, Gila, and Cibola national forests of Arizona and New Mexico between 2470 and 29990 m (8100-9800 feet).]
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Youngblood and Mauk 1985) [found in southern Utah in the Pine Valley, Abajo, and Tushar mountains between 2255 and 2560 m (7400-8400 feet).]
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Alexander et al. 1984a) [located in the Lincoln National Forest of south-central New Mexico from 2440-2896 m (8000-9500 feet).]
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Muldavin et al. 1996)
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (DeVelice et al. 1986) [found in the Wet Mountains and Spanish Peaks of southern Colorado and the Sangre de Cristo and San Juan Mountains of both southern Colorado and northern New Mexico from 2500-3000 m (8200-9850 feet).]
= Abies concolor / Acer glabrum Habitat Type (Alexander et al. 1987) [found in the Cibola National Forest of New Mexico from 2286-3140 m (7500-10,300 feet).]

Concept Author(s): M.C. Stuever and J.S. Hayden (1997a)

Author of Description: L.D. Engelking and K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-17-18

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., E. L. Fitzhugh, F. Ronco, Jr., and J. A. Ludwig. 1987. A classification of forest habitat types of the northern portion of the Cibola National Forest, NM. General Technical Report RM-143. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., F. Ronco, Jr., E. L. Fitzhugh, and J. A. Ludwig. 1984a. A classification of forest habitat types of the Lincoln National Forest, New Mexico. General Technical Report RM-104. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 29 pp.
  • Atzet, T., and D. L. Wheeler. 1984. Preliminary plant associations of the Siskiyou Mountains Province, Siskiyou National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
  • Atzet, T., and L. A. McCrimmon. 1990. Preliminary plant associations of the southern Oregon Cascade Mountain Province. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Siskiyou National Forest, Grants Pass, OR. 330 pp.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Coles, J., J. Von Loh, A. Wight, K. Schulz, and A. Evenden. 2009b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Timpanogos Cave National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/210. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 208 pp.
  • Crane, M. F. 1982. Fire ecology of Rocky Mountain Region forest habitat types. USDA Forest Service final report. 272 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L. 1983. Forest vegetation of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. 191 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. General Technical Report RM-131. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L., and J. A. Ludwig. 1983a. Climax forest series of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. Pages 45-53 in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Southwestern Habitat Types, 6-8 April 1983, Albuquerque, NM. USDA Forest Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Dieterich, J. H. 1980. Chimney Spring forest fire history. Research Paper RM-220. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 8 pp.
  • Fitzhugh, E. L., W. H. Moir, J. A. Ludwig, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1987. Forest habitat types in the Apache, Gila, and part of the Cibola national forests. General Technical Report RM-145. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 116 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1980. Forest vegetation of the Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-221. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 41 pp.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Larson, M., and W. H. Moir. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. Edition 2. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Moir, W. H., and J. A. Ludwig. 1979. A classification of spruce-fir and mixed conifer habitat types of Arizona and New Mexico. Research Paper RM-207. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 47 pp.
  • Muldavin, E. H., R. L. DeVelice, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1996. A classification of forest habitat types of southern Arizona and portions of the Colorado Plateau. General Technical Report RM-GTR-287. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 130 pp.
  • Muldavin, E., A. Kennedy, C. Jackson, P. Neville, T. Neville, K. Schulz, and M. Reid. 2011b. Vegetation classification and map: Bandelier National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR--2011/438. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Muldavin, E., P. Neville, C. Jackson, and T. Neville. 2006. A vegetation map of Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico. Natural Heritage New Mexico Publication No. 06-GTR-302. Natural Heritage New Mexico, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. 59 pp.
  • Niering, W. A., and C. H. Lowe. 1984. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains: Community types and dynamics. Vegetatio 58:3-28.
  • Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45:3-75.
  • Plummer, A. P., D. R. Christensen, and S. B. Monsen. 1968. Restoring big-game range in Utah. Publication No. 68-3. Utah Division of Fish and Game, Ephraim, UT. 183 pp.
  • Salas, D. E., J. Stevens, K. Schulz, M. Artmann, B. Friesen, S. Blauer, E. W. Schweiger, and A. Valdez. 2010b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2010/179. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Stuever, M. C., and J. S. Hayden. 1997a. Plant associations of Arizona and New Mexico, edition 3. Volume 1: Forests. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Habitat Typing Guides. 291 pp.
  • Tendick, A., B. Friesen, G. Kittel, P. Williams, J. Coles, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2011a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Cedar Breaks National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2011/470. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1986. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of southern New Mexico and central Arizona (north of the Mogollon Rim). USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 140 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987a. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 170 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987b. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 168 pp. plus insert.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.