Print Report

CEGL008412 Acer saccharum - Tilia americana / Asimina triloba / Jeffersonia diphylla - Caulophyllum thalictroides Forest

Type Concept Sentence: This rich cove / mesic slope forest occurs on concave, north- to northeast-facing slopes in the Piedmont and at low elevations in the Central Appalachians, usually along major waterways; examples contain the trees Acer saccharum or Acer nigrum, with Carya cordiformis, Celtis occidentalis, Fraxinus americana, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus muehlenbergii, Quercus rubra, Tilia americana, and Ulmus rubra.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sugar Maple - American Basswood / Pawpaw / Twinleaf - Blue Cohosh Forest

Colloquial Name: Central Appalachian-Piedmont Rich Cove / Mesic Slope Forest (Twinleaf - Blue Cohosh Type)

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community type occurs on mesic lower slopes at low elevations, over nutrient-rich substrates in the Ridge and Valley, Cumberlands, Central Appalachians, and Piedmont. Soils may be derived from limestone, dolomite, shale, siltstone, and various metamorphic and igneous rocks. Rock outcrops and bouldery colluvium are often prominent, but the soils supporting this unit are apparently deep, dark, and very fertile, with high mean pH and Ca levels. Canopy composition is mixed and variable, but either Acer saccharum var. saccharum or Acer nigrum, or both, are consistently important and characteristic. Carya cordiformis, Celtis occidentalis, Fraxinus americana, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus muehlenbergii, Quercus rubra, Tilia americana, and Ulmus rubra are frequent canopy associates. From the James River south, Aesculus flava is a frequent canopy associate. The most typical and abundant shrub layer species are Asimina triloba and Lindera benzoin, with shrub layers usually somewhat to very open (mean stratum cover = 35%). The herb layer is dense (>80% cover) and contains a number of leafy early-flowering species, among the most abundant of which are Jeffersonia diphylla, Hydrophyllum canadense, and Caulophyllum thalictroides. Somewhat more delicate spring ephemerals that are frequent to locally abundant include Chaerophyllum procumbens var. procumbens, Delphinium tricorne, Dicentra canadensis, Dicentra cucullaria, Erigenia bulbosa, Erythronium americanum ssp. americanum, Floerkea proserpinacoides, Mertensia virginica, Phlox divaricata, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Trillium sessile. Additional characteristic herbs are Asarum canadense, Carex albursina, Carex jamesii, Cystopteris protrusa, Hydrophyllum virginianum, Impatiens pallida, Osmorhiza claytonii, Osmorhiza longistylis, and Viola pubescens var. scabriuscula.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Although its canopy composition is similar to that of other rich forests, this type may be distinguished by the prevalence of Asimina triloba and herbaceous species that are confined to low elevations and are absent (or mostly so) from rich forest communities of mountain coves and ravines. Likewise, mountain species characteristic of medium to high elevations are generally absent. This community may be further distinguished by its relatively low-elevation habitats bordering major streams and alluvial floodplains. Because of the proximity to floodplains, species perhaps most often associated with alluvial habitats, e.g., Acer negundo, Celtis occidentalis, Juglans nigra, Ulmus americana, Mertensia virginica, etc., are occasionally important.

Since many characteristic plants of this unit (e.g., Acer nigrum, Carex jamesii, Erigenia bulbosa, Floerkea proserpinacoides, Hydrophyllum canadense, Jeffersonia diphylla, Phlox divaricata, and Trillium sessile) have ranges centered west or northwest of Virginia, it seems likely that the geographic distribution of this type lies primarily west of the Appalachians. Bowen et al. (1995) describe similar vegetation in the Tennessee River Gorge as a "north slope mixed mesophytic community." In a study of Jessamine Gorge, Kentucky, Campbell and Meijer (1989) detail another similar community, among the characteristic species of which are Acer saccharum, Quercus rubra, Fraxinus americana, Tilia spp., Carex albursina, Carex jamesii, Erythronium spp., Trillium sessile, Jeffersonia diphylla, and Dicentra spp. Forests of well-drained floodplain terraces in this gorge have a similar composition, but with Fagus grandifolia, Erigenia bulbosa, Phlox divaricata, and Polemonium reptans more prominent. Additional species with more western affinities that have been recorded in stands of this type include, in the Potomac River drainage, Arabis shortii, Enemion biternatum, Erythronium albidum, Phacelia ranunculacea, and Valeriana pauciflora; in southwestern Virginia, Actaea rubifolia, Phacelia purshii, Stellaria corei, Stylophorum diphyllum, and Synandra hispidula; and scattered throughout, Allium tricoccum, Carex careyana, Ellisia nyctelea, Panax trifolius, and Polemonium reptans (Fleming 1999).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Relatively undisturbed second-growth stands generally have a closed (80-100% cover) canopy of tall (>28 m), well-formed trees, the largest with dbh >50 cm and occasionally >80 cm. Canopy composition is mixed and variable, but either Acer saccharum var. saccharum or Acer nigrum, or both, are consistently important and characteristic. Carya cordiformis, Celtis occidentalis, Fraxinus americana, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus muehlenbergii, Quercus rubra, Tilia americana, and Ulmus rubra are frequent canopy associates. From the James River south, Aesculus flava is a frequent canopy associate. A sparse (30-40% cover) understory layer of trees 15-20 m tall contains smaller representatives of the canopy trees, especially the two Acer species. Cover in the vertical strata below 15 m is usually very sparse. The most typical and abundant shrub layer species are Asimina triloba and Lindera benzoin, with shrub layers usually somewhat to very open (mean stratum cover = 35%). The herb layer is dense (>80% cover) and contains a number of leafy early-flowering species, among the most abundant of which are Jeffersonia diphylla, Hydrophyllum canadense, and Caulophyllum thalictroides. Somewhat more delicate spring ephemerals that are frequent to locally abundant include Chaerophyllum procumbens var. procumbens, Delphinium tricorne, Dicentra canadensis, Dicentra cucullaria, Erigenia bulbosa, Erythronium americanum ssp. americanum, Floerkea proserpinacoides, Mertensia virginica, Phlox divaricata, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Trillium sessile. Additional characteristic herbs are Asarum canadense, Carex albursina, Carex jamesii, Cystopteris protrusa, Hydrophyllum virginianum, Impatiens pallida, Osmorhiza claytonii, Osmorhiza longistylis, and Viola pubescens var. scabriuscula (= Viola pubescens var. leiocarpon). The exotics Alliaria petiolata, Veronica hederifolia, and Stellaria media, along with the weedy native Galium aparine, are aggressive and problematic invaders of this vegetation type, even in undisturbed stands. Herbaceous layers of this community typically exhibit strong patch dominance and pronounced seasonal aspects. Although the constancies of dominants in sampled stands are very high, observations indicate that Jeffersonia diphylla, Hydrophyllum canadense, and other species may be abundant in some stands and absent from others. Herbaceous growth and flowering begins early and reaches maximal diversity in mid to late spring, after which many species begin to die back with the onset of summer temperatures and full canopy closure. As a result the late-summer aspect of these herbaceous layers is one of low cover and depauperate floristics, a stark contrast to the lush and vibrant aspect of spring (Fleming 1999).

Dynamics:  All of the sampled stands have largely recovered from logging in the distant past. Recent and current disturbances documented in plot sampling included excessive deer browse and invasive exotic weeds. Because of its locations adjacent to frequently flooded stream and river bottoms, which serve as migration corridors for many weedy plants, this association is particularly prone to degradation by nutrient-demanding, shade-tolerant exotics. Observations indicate that Dicentra spp. and Trillium sessile are particularly favored by grazing deer, while Caulophyllum thalictroides, Delphinium tricorne, Hydrophyllum spp., Jeffersonia diphylla are rarely, if ever, grazed. Reduction of native herb cover by deer probably promotes the establishment and abundance of the unpalatable, noxious weed Alliaria petiolata, perhaps the most serious exotic threat to native vegetation in these habitats (Fleming 1999).

Environmental Description:  This community type occurs on mesic lower slopes at low elevations (40-567 m [130-1860 feet]). In Virginia, most occurrences are associated with north- to east-facing slopes along major waterways in the mountains and Piedmont, including the Potomac River, the Shenandoah River and its two forks, the James River and its major tributaries, the Roanoke (Staunton) River and its major tributaries, the New River and its major tributaries, the Clinch River and its major tributaries, the Powell River, and forks of the Holston River. Soils may be derived from limestone, dolomite, shale, siltstone, and various metamorphic and igneous rocks. Rock outcrops and bouldery colluvium are often prominent, but the soils supporting this unit are apparently deep, dark, and very fertile, with high mean pH and Ca levels. The type is widely but somewhat locally distributed in valleys of the central Appalachian Mountains, generally in small to medium-sized patches. East of the Blue Ridge, it becomes more local and confined to sheltered slopes and bluffs along western Piedmont rivers. In Virginia and Maryland, the most extensive occurrences are probably in carbonate rock districts of the Ridge and Valley province (Fleming 1999).

Geographic Range: This community probably occurs at low elevations throughout the central Appalachian region, Cumberlands, and Piedmont in Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, and probably Tennessee. Its full geographic range, however, has not been determined. In Virginia, most occurrences are along major waterways of the Piedmont and mountains, including the Potomac River, the Shenandoah River and its two forks, the James River and its major tributaries, the Roanoke (Staunton) River and its major tributaries, and the New River and its major tributaries. The status of the type in the Clinch River, Powell River, and Holston River drainages of southwestern Virginia is less certain.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  KY, MD, TN, VA, WV




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Acer (nigrum, saccharum var. saccharum) / Asimina triloba / Jeffersonia diphylla - Hydrophyllum canadense Forest (Fleming 1999)
= Acer (nigrum, saccharum) - Tilia americana / Asimina triloba / Jeffersonia diphylla - Hydrophyllum canadense Forest (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
= Acer (nigrum, saccharum) - Tilia americana / Asimina triloba / Jeffersonia diphylla - Hydrophyllum canadense Forest (Fleming 2007)
> Aesculus flava - Acer saccharum / Dicentra cucullaria - Jeffersonia diphylla Association (Rawinski et al. 1996)
< Sugar Maple - Basswood: 26 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): G.P. Fleming (1999)

Author of Description: G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 10-01-06

  • Bowen, B., M. Pyne, and D. Withers. 1995. An ecological survey of selected tracts in the Tennessee River Gorge: A report to the Tennessee River Gorge Trust. Tennessee Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environment and Conservation, Nashville. 100 pp.
  • Campbell, J. J. N., and W. Meijer. 1989. The flora and vegetation of Jessamine Gorge, Jessamine County, Kentucky: A remarkable concentration of rare species in the Bluegrass region. Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Science 50:27-45.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 1999. Plant communities of limestone, dolomite, and other calcareous substrates in the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 99-4. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. Unpublished report submitted to the USDA Forest Service. 218 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2007. Ecological communities of the Potomac Gorge in Virginia: Composition, floristics, and environmental dynamics. Natural Heritage Technical Report 07-12. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 341 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009b. Classification of selected Virginia montane wetland groups. In-house analysis, December 2009. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. Taverna. 2006. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, western region. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2006. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Lea, C. 2004. Draft vegetation types in National Capital Region Parks. Edited by S.C. Gawler and J. Teague. Working draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. July 2004. 157 pp.
  • Muller, R. N. 2003. Nutrient relations of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystems. Pages 15-37 in: F. S. Gilliam and M. R. Roberts, editors. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Rawinski, T. J., K. N. Hickman, J. Waller-Eling, G. P. Fleming, C. S. Austin, S. D. Helmick, C. Huber, G. Kappesser, F. C. Huber, Jr., T. Bailey, and T. K. Collins. 1996. Plant communities and ecological land units of the Glenwood Ranger District, George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report 96-20. Richmond. 65 pp. plus appendices.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • WVNHP [West Virginia Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, Elkins.