Print Report

CEGL006240 Quercus palustris - (Quercus bicolor) - Acer rubrum / Vaccinium corymbosum / Osmunda cinnamomea Wet Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Pin Oak - (Swamp White Oak ) - Red Maple / Highbush Blueberry / Cinnamon Fern Wet Forest

Colloquial Name: Northeastern Pin Oak - Swamp White Oak Wet Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association comprises a perched hardwood swamp occurring in the northeastern United States from New Hampshire to Virginia. These are closed to partially open, deciduous, seasonally flooded forests. They occur in basin areas that are seasonally wet (winter and early spring) with a shallow, perched water table, but tend to be dry in late summer and early fall. There is usually pronounced hummock-and-hollow microtopography. They are found on sandy loams or clayey soils of glacial lakeplains, or on soils with impermeable subsoils in unglaciated regions. There is generally some layer that impedes drainage. The canopy is codominated by Quercus palustris and/or Quercus bicolor and Acer rubrum. Common associates include Nyssa sylvatica and occasionally Tsuga canadensis or Carya spp. The shrub layer may be sparse or dense and contains Ilex verticillata, Vaccinium corymbosum, Viburnum dentatum, Cephalanthus occidentalis, and Kalmia angustifolia. The sparse herb layer may include Osmunda cinnamomea, Scirpus cyperinus, Thelypteris palustris, Thelypteris simulata, Carex frankii, Glyceria striata, Isoetes spp., Carex crinita, Onoclea sensibilis, and Osmunda regalis.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Vegetation tentatively assigned to this association was classified through analysis of a regional dataset assembled for the NCR vegetation mapping project. The type was represented by nine Maryland and Virginia plots. Composition of this southern variant differs somewhat from the existing description but is conceptually similar. Although six states to the north of Maryland and Virginia have recognized this type, substantial data from across this range are lacking (L. Sneddon pers. comm.). Therefore, at present, this association represents a broad concept that may have to be split once variation over its range is more fully understood.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This seasonally flooded pin oak community occurs in the northeastern United States. These are closed to partially open, deciduous, seasonally flooded forests codominated by Quercus palustris and Acer rubrum. Common associates include Quercus bicolor, Nyssa sylvatica, and occasionally Tsuga canadensis or Carya spp. The shrub layer may be sparse or dense and contains Ilex verticillata, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Viburnum dentatum. The sparse herb layer may include Osmunda cinnamomea, Scirpus cyperinus, Thelypteris palustris, Thelypteris simulata, Carex frankii, Glyceria striata, Isoetes spp., Carex crinita, Onoclea sensibilis, and Osmunda regalis. Occurrences at the southern end of the range in Maryland and northern Virginia are generally very species-poor, with an overstory dominated by Quercus palustris (rarely Quercus bicolor), Acer rubrum, and Liquidambar styraciflua. Species of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum, Vaccinium fuscatum, and Vaccinium formosum) are the most characteristic shrubs. Herbs are very sparse.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This vegetation is found in basin areas that are seasonally wet (winter and early spring) with a shallow, perched water table, but which tend to be dry in late summer and early fall. There is usually pronounced hummock-and-hollow microtopography. They are found on sandy loams or clayey soils of glacial lakeplains, or on soils with impermeable subsoils in unglaciated regions. Although substrates are variable, all generally have some layer that impedes drainage and may receive groundwater seepage. Soils collected from Maryland and Virginia plots have very low pH and base cation levels.

Geographic Range: This vegetation occurs in southern New England south to Maryland and northern Virginia.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, DC?, DE, MA, MD, NH, NJ, NY, PA, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Tupelo - Swamp White Oak - Pin Oak Association (Searcy et al. 1994)

Concept Author(s): Eastern Ecology Group/Central Appalachian Planning Team

Author of Description: S.L. Neid and G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-29-07

  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., A. L. Feldmann, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, E. Eastman, E. Largay, and L. A. Sneddon. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping at Gateway National Recreation Area. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/107. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 283 pp.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2011b. Analysis of Coastal Plain / Outer Piedmont bottomlands and non-alluvial wetlands in Virginia, 400 plots. In-house analysis, January 2011. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Golet, F. C., A. J. K. Calhoun, W. R. DeRagon, D. J. Lowry, and A. J. Gold. 1993. Ecology of red maple swamps in the glaciated Northeast: A community profile. USDI Fish & Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 151 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2001b. Soil survey of Gateway National Recreation Area, New York and New Jersey. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and USDI National Park Service, Gateway National Recreation Area in partnership with Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station and New York City Soil and Water Conservation District.
  • Searcy, K. B., H. Lanza and A. Park. 1994. Inventory and characterization of natural communities with a tupelo-swamp white oak-pin oak association in the Connecticut River Valley, Hampshire and Franklin counties, Massachusetts. Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  • Sechler, F. C., G. J. Edinger, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014. Vegetation classification and mapping at Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National Historic Sites, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/873, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 392 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Zimmerman, E. A. 2011f. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Oak - Mixed Hardwood Palustrine Forest Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16019] (accessed January 31, 2012)
  • Zimmerman, E. A., T. Davis, M. A. Furedi, B. Eichelberger, J. McPherson, S. Seymour, G. Podniesinski, N. Dewar, and J. Wagner, editors. 2012. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Communities.aspx]